falcolnfanatic

[quote name="VNUPE" post="1131872" timestamp="1322352757"] But Trigger! You guys are MIGHTY Coldspring!!!! Remember????? To hear you guys tell it at the start of the playoffs, y'all were supposed to roll everyone! [/quote] They are rolling, rolling right along to Dallas ;)

[quote name="VNUPE" post="1131856" timestamp="1322352169"] Throughout the playoffs Coldspring has been surviving and WOS has been rolling it's opponents......and you guys think Coldspring is gonna turn it around this week????? [/quote] Cs has played a lot better opponents in the playoffs than wos has. Just like wos played better opponents in the regular season and struggled while cs rolled.

[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1131721" timestamp="1322347528"] Stings by 14 [/quote] You trying to go 0-4? ;D

[quote name="BCgrad05" post="1131134" timestamp="1322332467"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=92236.msg1131117#msg1131117 date=1322331409] [quote author=BCgrad05 link=topic=92236.msg1131109#msg1131109 date=1322331222] 2011 BC, I'm hearing this Defense is statistically the best defense to ever come through Bridge City..that's saying alot, if they woulda beat WOS they'd still be playing today & if Menard doesn't get hurt vs CS I'm confident they'd be sitting in the 4th Rd right now..loaded with talent. I feel like the FB & TE woulda fit this team alot better than the spread [/quote] BC didn't lose because menard got hurt. CS had one of thier running backs hurt too. BC lost to a better team, I don't call that underachieving. [/quote] A running back that was getting completely shut down? Give me a break..I honestly don't believe Coldspring was the better team. I'm sure you didn't see the game though [/quote] So your argument is that Monroe getting hurt didn't matter, because he was getting shut down? Well then I guess menard getting hurt didn't matter either right? How many points did they score while menard was in the game? If you think BC is them better team then I know you weren't at the game.

[quote name="BCgrad05" post="1131109" timestamp="1322331222"] 2011 BC, I'm hearing this Defense is statistically the best defense to ever come through Bridge City..that's saying alot, if they woulda beat WOS they'd still be playing today & if Menard doesn't get hurt vs CS I'm confident they'd be sitting in the 4th Rd right now..loaded with talent. I feel like the FB & TE woulda fit this team alot better than the spread [/quote] BC didn't lose because menard got hurt. CS had one of thier running backs hurt too. BC lost to a better team, I don't call that underachieving.

[quote name="WOS92" post="1130535" timestamp="1322275263"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=92194.msg1130477#msg1130477 date=1322274088] [quote author=skipper link=topic=92194.msg1130467#msg1130467 date=1322273844] OH before i forget bridge citys  QB was not hurt in the wo-s game he was on fire thank your lucky star on the bridge city game [/quote] So? Coldsprings running back was out when they played bc. Stop making excuses. Venom33 that statement goes both ways. [/quote] Didn't he have their only TD on a 70+ yard run? [/quote] Monroe was hurt vs bche has over 1,000 rushing yards as well and carried the load last week vs bellville.

[quote name="venom33" post="1130487" timestamp="1322274327"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=92194.msg1130477#msg1130477 date=1322274088] [quote author=skipper link=topic=92194.msg1130467#msg1130467 date=1322273844] OH before i forget bridge citys  QB was not hurt in the wo-s game he was on fire thank your lucky star on the bridge city game [/quote] So? Coldsprings running back was out when they played bc. Stop making excuses. Venom33 that statement goes both ways. [/quote] very true! i wasnt calling the cs opponents "cupcakes," i said they were struggling with mediocre teams that their faithful predicted blowouts on! [/quote] I didn't say you were, but another wos fan was.

[quote name="skipper" post="1130467" timestamp="1322273844"] OH before i forget bridge citys  QB was not hurt in the wo-s game he was on fire thank your lucky star on the bridge city game [/quote] So? Coldsprings running back was out when they played bc. Stop making excuses. Venom33 that statement goes both ways.

[quote name="venom33" post="1130425" timestamp="1322273359"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=92194.msg1130416#msg1130416 date=1322273255] [quote author=skipper link=topic=92194.msg1130403#msg1130403 date=1322273096] thank GOD for Gilbert he is there team [/quote] No thier defense is thier team. Bullard will find out next week ;) [/quote] who did huffman play today? [/quote] We played a REAL team in the playoffs and lost. Maybe yall will play someone some time. I wonder who wos payed off in the uil to get that playoff schedule? Oh and wos92 when you get to the third round of the playoffs there are no "lesser opponents".

[quote name="2% Milk" post="1130415" timestamp="1322273240"] [quote author=Trigger link=topic=92194.msg1130398#msg1130398 date=1322273055] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=92194.msg1130387#msg1130387 date=1322272899] [quote author=WOS92 link=topic=92194.msg1130374#msg1130374 date=1322272770] Not hating. Just noting that they are struggling mightily against "lesser" opponents week-in and week-out. [/quote] Weaker opponents? They played BC and 10-1 Bellville not exactly weak opponents. [b]They didn't play [size=24pt][color=pink]cupcakes[/color][/size] like wos did.[/b][/quote] ;D [/quote]WOS beat BC to and yall struggled with them like crazy. [/quote] Yeah teams never step up play in the playoffs right? Give me a break its not like wos dominated bc either.

[quote name="skipper" post="1130403" timestamp="1322273096"] thank GOD for Gilbert he is there team [/quote] No thier defense is thier team. Bullard will find out next week ;)

[quote name="WOS92" post="1130374" timestamp="1322272770"] Not hating. Just noting that they are struggling mightily against "lesser" opponents week-in and week-out. [/quote] Weaker opponents? They played BC and 10-1 Bellville not exactly weak opponents. They didn't play cupcakes like wos did.

[quote name="skipper" post="1130355" timestamp="1322272553"] 26-1 please play someone :o [/quote] Yeah going to state they didnt play anyone right? I'm sorry cs hasn't had the luxury of playing the easiest two playoff games in the state like wos has.

[quote name="LP0175" post="1126963" timestamp="1321928450"] Question: has Brooks Haack not been starting all year? I looked at the capsule and saw that another person leads the QB stats. [/quote] No Brooks Haack is the QB, had a good year too nearly 2000 yards 30 tds and 2 pics.

[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1126843" timestamp="1321923123"] That was Katy who had to forfeit in 98. And Katy woulda got a 50 spot hung on them also. That was Benson's soph year. [/quote] Doubt it Katy was defending state champions and were 15-0. They might have lost but it wouldn't have been a blowout.

350ste author=mypooh link=topic=91977.msg1126457#msg1126457 date=1321900741] [quote name="falconfanatic" post="1126432" timestamp="1321900187"] BTW in the 90s Katy was pretty good. They won state in 97 and went a combined 33-3 between 97-99. They would've won another state championship in 98, but had to forfeit two games, because of an ineligible player. Total record for the 90s  was 107-25. [/quote] Well you be at the game ? If so I wouldn't mind sitting on Katy side with you. BTW the 90's comment was meant with  the reason you give. When the 90's started and teams seen them on there scheduled no one thought they would win the title in 97. Everytime has to have a starting point. I happen to think ours is this year. [/quote] Probably not. I'm only in town for a week and will most likely be with family the whole time.

BTW in the 90s Katy was pretty good. They won state in 97 and went a combined 33-3 between 97-99. They would've won another state championship in 98, but had to forfeit two games, because of an ineligible player. Total record for the 90s  was 107-25.

[quote name="mypooh" post="1126400" timestamp="1321899455"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91977.msg1126391#msg1126391 date=1321899166] [quote author=mypooh link=topic=91977.msg1126384#msg1126384 date=1321898714] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91977.msg1126347#msg1126347 date=1321898005] [quote author=mypooh link=topic=91977.msg1126310#msg1126310 date=1321896744] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91977.msg1126288#msg1126288 date=1321896053] Katy has dominated pretty much everybody this season. Closest game they had was last week and they still won by 14. This reminds me of the season they went 16-0 with andre dean at rb. I just don't see anyone stopping them. They are probably the best team in the country. Sorry La Porte yall are about to run into the buzz saw that is the Katy Tigers. [/quote] People think that every year. The past two years someone has gotten in there to steal there trophy." They are who we thought they where." ( Denny Green Former Arizona Cardinals coach) Katy puts there pants on one leg at a time just like everyone else. LaPorte will fight them pretty good. That Cy Woods team finished 3rd in district. So the next couple teams will be not be afraid to bring it to them. [/quote] Yes, but this is a different team. Last year they relied on the run too much they had 4500 rushing yards compared to 1500 passing and they gave up 17 points a game. This year they are more balanced running for 3100 and passing for 2000, plus they only give up 7 points a game. Last year they lost to the eventual state champion 35-38 infront of 40,000 people the year before they lost in the state championship to Abilene. In the last three year only three teams have beaten Katy Pearland(16-0), Abilene(16-0), and the woodlands(11-1) all of those teams were undefeated when they beat Katy. That is pretty impressive. Someone may upset Katy, but it will be someone capable of winning state. I just don't think La Porte or Pam for that matter can do it. Well I tell you this much don't be surprise if it happens LaPorte 11-1 and PAM 11-1. That's some really good teams that are in the process of being great. Nothing against Katy but down here in SE Tx we don't fear them like else where. If I where to ask you at the point the pass three years would Katy get beat you would of told me NO. So I'm I surprised that you stroking them. NO Americans love the front runner but the underdog has to eat every once in while.  [/quote] [/quote] You shouldn't fear them, but odds are you wont win. Those teams that beat Katy were all better than Pam and La Porte. BTW I'm not "stroking" Katy I'm not even a Katy fan, but I do like the way they play. I gave you facts. You just want Katy to lose because you know deep down that Pam won't beat them in the next round ether. [/quote] In the 90,s before Katy become Katy someone probably told them that you can't beat such and such. So this is the reason they play the game. BTW !!! This is the definations of stroking them BTW I'm not "stroking" Katy I'm not even a Katy fan, but I do like the way they play I couldn't of said it any better. [/quote] Really cause I thought stroking was bring up what if this and that and doing anything to provide false hope for your team. Kinda like you're doing right now ;)

[quote name="mypooh" post="1126384" timestamp="1321898714"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91977.msg1126347#msg1126347 date=1321898005] [quote author=mypooh link=topic=91977.msg1126310#msg1126310 date=1321896744] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91977.msg1126288#msg1126288 date=1321896053] Katy has dominated pretty much everybody this season. Closest game they had was last week and they still won by 14. This reminds me of the season they went 16-0 with andre dean at rb. I just don't see anyone stopping them. They are probably the best team in the country. Sorry La Porte yall are about to run into the buzz saw that is the Katy Tigers. [/quote] People think that every year. The past two years someone has gotten in there to steal there trophy." They are who we thought they where." ( Denny Green Former Arizona Cardinals coach) Katy puts there pants on one leg at a time just like everyone else. LaPorte will fight them pretty good. That Cy Woods team finished 3rd in district. So the next couple teams will be not be afraid to bring it to them. [/quote] Yes, but this is a different team. Last year they relied on the run too much they had 4500 rushing yards compared to 1500 passing and they gave up 17 points a game. This year they are more balanced running for 3100 and passing for 2000, plus they only give up 7 points a game. Last year they lost to the eventual state champion 35-38 infront of 40,000 people the year before they lost in the state championship to Abilene. In the last three year only three teams have beaten Katy Pearland(16-0), Abilene(16-0), and the woodlands(11-1) all of those teams were undefeated when they beat Katy. That is pretty impressive. Someone may upset Katy, but it will be someone capable of winning state. I just don't think La Porte or Pam for that matter can do it. Well I tell you this much don't be surprise if it happens LaPorte 11-1 and PAM 11-1. That's some really good teams that are in the process of being great. Nothing against Katy but down here in SE Tx we don't fear them like else where. If I where to ask you at the point the pass three years would Katy get beat you would of told me NO. So I'm I surprised that you stroking them. NO Americans love the front runner but the underdog has to eat every once in while.  [/quote] [/quote] You shouldn't fear them, but odds are you wont win. Those teams that beat Katy were all better than Pam and La Porte. BTW I'm not "stroking" Katy I'm not even a Katy fan, but I do like the way they play. I gave you facts. You just want Katy to lose because you know deep down that Pam won't beat them in the next round ether.

[quote name="mypooh" post="1126310" timestamp="1321896744"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91977.msg1126288#msg1126288 date=1321896053] Katy has dominated pretty much everybody this season. Closest game they had was last week and they still won by 14. This reminds me of the season they went 16-0 with andre dean at rb. I just don't see anyone stopping them. They are probably the best team in the country. Sorry La Porte yall are about to run into the buzz saw that is the Katy Tigers. [/quote] People think that every year. The past two years someone has gotten in there to steal there trophy." They are who we thought they where." ( Denny Green Former Arizona Cardinals coach) Katy puts there pants on one leg at a time just like everyone else. LaPorte will fight them pretty good. That Cy Woods team finished 3rd in district. So the next couple teams will be not be afraid to bring it to them. [/quote] Yes, but this is a different team. Last year they relied on the run too much they had 4500 rushing yards compared to 1500 passing and they gave up 17 points a game. This year they are more balanced running for 3100 and passing for 2000, plus they only give up 7 points a game. Last year they lost to the eventual state champion 35-38 infront of 40,000 people the year before they lost in the state championship to Abilene. In the last three year only three teams have beaten Katy Pearland(16-0), Abilene(16-0), and the woodlands(11-1) all of those teams were undefeated when they beat Katy. That is pretty impressive. Someone may upset Katy, but it will be someone capable of winning state. I just don't think La Porte or Pam for that matter can do it.

Katy has dominated pretty much everybody this season. Closest game they had was last week and they still won by 14. This reminds me of the season they went 16-0 with andre dean at rb. I just don't see anyone stopping them. They are probably the best team in the country. Sorry La Porte yall are about to run into the buzz saw that is the Katy Tigers.

[quote name="Englebert" post="1124720" timestamp="1321749895"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91895.msg1124712#msg1124712 date=1321749607] [quote author=EZDawg link=topic=91895.msg1124642#msg1124642 date=1321746291] [quote author=robanadana link=topic=91895.msg1124622#msg1124622 date=1321745571] [quote author=EZDawg link=topic=91895.msg1124583#msg1124583 date=1321744118] I'm with you Englebert. You deserve it by winning more district games. I'm not a fan of 4 teams in the playoffs in a district with 8 teams. It teaches mediocrity. Three should be the max , IMO, in a district with 8 teams, and 2 teams with a 6 team district. Sure it's great that Ozen is doing well, but I bet there are not many other 4th place teams still in the playoffs. It's more the exception than the rule. Growing up, I can never remember being excited in the 100m dash when I finished in 4th place out of 8 runners. [/quote] Fellas, I don't think the issue is sending so many teams. It's the fact that Texas has so many kids in school it's hard demographically to make districts that are fair travel and otherwise to all the teams. It's either we take 4A and make two divisions out of it or we make 4A or add more As on the top end (7A?) and the teams travel across the state according to their size. There are a heck of a lot more kids and schools now than there were in the 70s when I was a kid. It's no more unrealistic now than when we (Vidor) had to play in a 5A district in the 90s when we had the same number of kids as PNG or Nederland. We played in 4 team districts in the 70s. Simple math. [/quote] I understand where you're coming from with travel and all, but back when you and I played, only the best team (s) made it to the playoffs, and it made it so that every game in district was important. Football (and sports in general) teach kids how to approach life. For example, I've observed a lot of young kids who want to work a 30 hour week and get paid a 40 hour week. Just look at the direction our country is going. I know AAW, we are suppose to discuss this in the political forum-sorry.  8) For me, it's more about the bigger picture...Again, JMO. [/quote] Read my signature. The older generation always thinks the younger generation is gonna destroy the world. It hasnt happened yet. Kids are kids are kids, the kids now aren't much different from kids when you were growing up. [/quote] So what happened to the Romans? [/quote] They became Italians 8)

[quote name="EZDawg" post="1124642" timestamp="1321746291"] [quote author=robanadana link=topic=91895.msg1124622#msg1124622 date=1321745571] [quote author=EZDawg link=topic=91895.msg1124583#msg1124583 date=1321744118] I'm with you Englebert. You deserve it by winning more district games. I'm not a fan of 4 teams in the playoffs in a district with 8 teams. It teaches mediocrity. Three should be the max , IMO, in a district with 8 teams, and 2 teams with a 6 team district. Sure it's great that Ozen is doing well, but I bet there are not many other 4th place teams still in the playoffs. It's more the exception than the rule. Growing up, I can never remember being excited in the 100m dash when I finished in 4th place out of 8 runners. [/quote] Fellas, I don't think the issue is sending so many teams. It's the fact that Texas has so many kids in school it's hard demographically to make districts that are fair travel and otherwise to all the teams. It's either we take 4A and make two divisions out of it or we make 4A or add more As on the top end (7A?) and the teams travel across the state according to their size. There are a heck of a lot more kids and schools now than there were in the 70s when I was a kid. It's no more unrealistic now than when we (Vidor) had to play in a 5A district in the 90s when we had the same number of kids as PNG or Nederland. We played in 4 team districts in the 70s. Simple math. [/quote] I understand where you're coming from with travel and all, but back when you and I played, only the best team (s) made it to the playoffs, and it made it so that every game in district was important. Football (and sports in general) teach kids how to approach life. For example, I've observed a lot of young kids who want to work a 30 hour week and get paid a 40 hour week. Just look at the direction our country is going. I know AAW, we are suppose to discuss this in the political forum-sorry.  8) For me, it's more about the bigger picture...Again, JMO. [/quote] Read my signature. The older generation always thinks the younger generation is gonna destroy the world. It hasnt happened yet. Kids are kids are kids, the kids now aren't much different from kids when you were growing up.

You would be suprised what some schools would allow. Similar things have happened around here too.

[quote name="PantherX" post="1122665" timestamp="1321671369"] [quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91832.msg1122650#msg1122650 date=1321671146] [quote author=PantherX link=topic=91832.msg1122647#msg1122647 date=1321670907] [quote author=paintballove link=topic=91832.msg1122624#msg1122624 date=1321670322] [quote author=PantherX link=topic=91832.msg1122618#msg1122618 date=1321670157] Is Townley still out [/quote] As of half yes [/quote]think he will be back, that hurts to loose him [/quote] Probably not it looks like it might of been a concussion, and if that is the case with the new rules he will be done for the night. [/quote][quote author=falconfanatic link=topic=91832.msg1122650#msg1122650 date=1321671146] [quote author=PantherX link=topic=91832.msg1122647#msg1122647 date=1321670907] [quote author=paintballove link=topic=91832.msg1122624#msg1122624 date=1321670322] [quote author=PantherX link=topic=91832.msg1122618#msg1122618 date=1321670157] Is Townley still out [/quote] As of half yes [/quote]think he will be back, that hurts to loose him [/quote] Probably not it looks like it might of been a concussion, and if that is the case with the new rules he will be done for the night. [/quote] that tough, do you know if the game is being broadcast [/quote] It was supposed to be on psnsports.com but they didn't have it when I checked, navasotanews.com or something like that is broadcasting now.