cougar14

Good job SETX guys on the rankings. Except for putting Central in front of Crosby I think y'all hit the rankings on the screws. Hard to argue with results come playoff time.

Has anybody found the score to the Wheatley vs Terry game?

#23 kept Ozen in it. Crosby was up 16 in the 3rd quarter but Ozen started with the full court press and fought back to within 1 point. Proud of Crosby holding it together. Boys from Ozen fought hard as usual. Saveat may be a better Coach than Eggans but just like football this year, Crosby has more horses.

Break out the shoe polish. See y'all at the Merril Center. 53-50 Crosby. Putting 20-4a out of their misery one squad at a time.

40-28 Crosby. Almost to Katy baby

20-4a fans were right. Saveat is a lot better coach than Eggans. His has his boys only down 10 at half. 29-19 Crosby

18-15 Crosby. Crosby got t'd up for dunking before the game

ozen looks like they have more here than the football game.

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1378788" timestamp="1361668705"] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109752.msg1378785#msg1378785 date=1361668508] [quote author=luvdagame link=topic=109752.msg1378780#msg1378780 date=1361668307] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109752.msg1378777#msg1378777 date=1361667801] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=109752.msg1378775#msg1378775 date=1361667447] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109752.msg1378774#msg1378774 date=1361667389] [quote author=TopFlight link=topic=109752.msg1378768#msg1378768 date=1361667108] Flipping for East chambers or Lee College..c'mon East Chambers..lol [/quote]East Chambers has a gym? Is the floor made out of parkay? [/quote] Much better facility than Crosby's. ;) [/quote]Must be pretty nice then 'cause Crosby has the best basketball facility in 19-4a. Haven't seen SC though. [/quote] C'mon-"the best" in 19-4A? When the last time you visited every facility in 19-4A? Must have been awhile. [/quote]I've been to them all except Summer Creek. Even Galena Park's abd GCM's when they were in the district. If the game was closer to [b]Crosby the 1400 EC says it could possibly hold wouldn't be enough[/b]. [/quote] I highly doubt that.  ::) EC gym just held this week a 4A double header Bi-District playoffs of Ozen/Summer Creek and Nederland/Humble. I think it is big enough facility for a single game between Crosby and Ozen. ;) [/quote]Winnie is almost an hour and a half from Crosby. Most of our fans won't drive over an hour for less than an hour game. It would barely hold over 1k people with a broadcast set up but like I said the Crosby fans aren't going to drive that far for a basketball game. [Hidden Content] Crosby played Waltrip one year when they had Antonio Felu and packed the Lamar High School's gym.

[quote name="luvdagame" post="1378780" timestamp="1361668307"] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109752.msg1378777#msg1378777 date=1361667801] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=109752.msg1378775#msg1378775 date=1361667447] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109752.msg1378774#msg1378774 date=1361667389] [quote author=TopFlight link=topic=109752.msg1378768#msg1378768 date=1361667108] Flipping for East chambers or Lee College..c'mon East Chambers..lol [/quote]East Chambers has a gym? Is the floor made out of parkay? [/quote] Much better facility than Crosby's. ;) [/quote]Must be pretty nice then 'cause Crosby has the best basketball facility in 19-4a. Haven't seen SC though. [/quote] C'mon-"the best" in 19-4A? When the last time you visited every facility in 19-4A? Must have been awhile. [/quote]I've been to them all except Summer Creek. Even Galena Park's and GCM's when they were in the district. If the game was closer to Crosby the 1400 EC says it could possibly hold wouldn't be enough. BH is pretty nice but kind of short on capicity.

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1378775" timestamp="1361667447"] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109752.msg1378774#msg1378774 date=1361667389] [quote author=TopFlight link=topic=109752.msg1378768#msg1378768 date=1361667108] Flipping for East chambers or Lee College..c'mon East Chambers..lol [/quote]East Chambers has a gym? Is the floor made out of parkay? [/quote] Much better facility than Crosby's. ;) [/quote]Must be pretty nice then 'cause Crosby has the best basketball facility in 19-4a. Haven't seen SC though.

[quote name="TopFlight" post="1378768" timestamp="1361667108"] Flipping for East chambers or Lee College..c'mon East Chambers..lol [/quote]East Chambers has a gym? Is the floor made out of parkay?

We might as well do it at the scene of the last crime in North Shore. Just make sure y'all don't practice too much before the game. LOL

Will this be any different from the football game?

[quote name="jkbtjc53" post="1377106" timestamp="1361450660"] The Crosby fan is right even though I feel like he is being a hater. Montana doesn't have and offer. Of course with how good a player he is people will say he does to defend the kid. But the BYU deal was a walk on situation his parents can more then afford it from what im told. And he's not and elite enough player to request a school holds his scholarship for two years while he goes on a mission. Some people need to stop being blinded fans and think logically. And do some research, the elite players who do decide they are going on these missions and have a understanding with the coach and University still sign scholarship papers their senior year. With that being said Ray Woodard is and idiot I would have signed this kid! [/quote]Thanks Coach. I'm not being a hater either. I would say the same thing even if we didn't lose to them two years ago. Ask the BH fans what I said about Denny and he's a better athlete. My son will be playing 7th grade ball for Crosby next year and when he's a senior I wouldn't call evaluating him criticism. He'll read it for motivation. That's the issue with some of these kids now, people that don't know the game tell them how great they are when that's not always the case so when it comes down to the nut-cutting your left wondering what happened when the people that do it for a living say otherwise. I'm sorry if you think I was bashing him but I was very direct on Raelon Singleton too when he was having his troubles early in the year. Some people IM me and say "thanks for being honest" while other say "you're an idiot" with no substance to support it. I'm truly sorry if you think I was bashing but to everybody on this board I ask now to please state your opinions when the next Cougar14 is is under the lights in a few years. I guarantee y'all will be a lot nicer than me.

[quote name="Bleedblackandgold" post="1377091" timestamp="1361431025"] Wow again you have no idea what you are talking about. You really should just not talk about anything in our area or about someone you have no idea who they are except for what you see in the football field. He isnt even searching to play linebacker, but i forgot you research everything and know what your talking about. And of course cant leave this thread alone and let a great football player and great KID celebrate a great moment in his life without posting something negative Like I said he is a family friend and has many offers from different good schools, but you know being the christian he and his family are they pray about their decisions and need to make sure its the right thing. He most likely will go to BYU because its a mormon school. The last time I looked BYU is a "good" school and has put out some good talent like Qb Steve Young, Fb Todd Christensen, DE Brett Keisel, Qb Jim McMahon, TE Dennis Pitta, WR Austin Collie just to name a few plus some good coaches, but im sure you knew that already because you research everything so thoroughly. [/quote]Extremely thoroughly, I've looked at BYU's recruiting page and mentions on their boards and have seen nothing. Trying to walk on at BYU after completing his mission is very different than an offer but you might not know that since you probably didn't play in college. When he VISITED BYU they would OFFER him when he visited as a junior like they did these kids which some will go on missions. Great high school player and sounds like a great kid, take the black and gold blinders off and look at the situation objectively. You're the one who looks like he doesn't know what he's talking about. My KID is the same height as MQ and probably faster, too bad my little cougar14 is only in the 6th grade, otherwise I might be hiding a secret offer.      [Hidden Content] * Funny though, BYU offered but McNeese wouldn't. Go figure. I'm done though, these Dayton boys are in here giving it to me for even going back and forth with you.

[quote name="Bleedblackandgokd" post="1377060" timestamp="1361427302"] Cougar 14 you are still mad about that embarassment and blow out loss in the playoffs to us, get over it! Also you need to get your facts straight and know what your talking about before you run your mouth. I know his family very well and Quirante has many offers from many different good colleges, they are just making sure that they will hold his scholarship for when he gets back from his mission. Also he was very deserving of both awards because he put up some of the best stats and he played full time both sides of the ball and blew out your cougars! And stop talking about your twins that put up such "great numbers" against us. too bad the numbers couldnt have added up on the score board. [/quote]Hey, that first round loss two years ago wasn't anywhere near as embarrassing as that 50+ I watched SC hang on y'all in Deer Park this year, but like I said you go ahead and keep talking about it because I doubt you have anymore playoffs wins in the near future. Playoff losses are part of going to the playoffs but I know y'all aren't far removed from the 2-8 and 3-7 years so you wouldn't know much about that. As far as stats, man you really shouldn't have said that. As a 15 year old junior this year Aston Walter (qb) put up 2893 total yards along with his brother Austin's (rb) 2262 total yards. That's over 5,000 yards they put up as babies. Quirante's 2218 would be third in that category. I do extensive research to make my posts and read recruiting boards very in depth. While he may have an offer from somewhere don't get on here saying they're "good" schools because I know differently as does that WOS coach. If they really wanted him he could sign his letter of intent and still go on a mission. There's just not may scholarships available for undersized lbs with mediocre measurables. So you keep talking about that 2011 playoff game while we go back to the playoffs for the 8th straight year in search of a regional crown.

[quote name="tupac7" post="1377049" timestamp="1361423098"] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109602.msg1377043#msg1377043 date=1361421792] [quote author=tupac7 link=topic=109602.msg1377011#msg1377011 date=1361416967] I will admit I am biased...I like Montana as well as several other local talented athletes that I see in the area. I understand not all can get signed, but the BEST one in the area has me baffled. [/quote]Despite what Vidor fans think Montana isn't and wasn't the best player in the area. Recruiters have told y'all what I've been saying all along. Should he have won the offensive award? I think 1881 yards on 192 carries and 33 tds says yes, and he was well deserving. He had good defensive numbers for his position but there was a player from Nederland, Ozen (not Tony Brown), and WOS who had better numbers for their positions even though they didn't stand out like Montana's tackle numbers or his 3 picks. I'm not going to name them because I'm sure that will take us on another tangent. Just take the emotion out of it and ask what position does he actually play? He wasn't a better pure qb than Mitchell and Lamar signed him as an athlete. He wasn't a better pure rb than Glenn Roberts and he went D2. He not a better pure lb than Garrett Dolan (BH) and all he could get was an upstart HBU offer. With his measurables he needs to stand out in something besides heart which the recruiters have clearly told you he doesn't. Great high school football player but don't let the numbers he ran up in a gimmick offense sway y'all into thinking he's the best player in the Triangle because the guys that base their mortgage payments on evaluating high school players have definitively told you otherwise.  * I agree with whoever said he's going on a mission because he didn't get any worthwhile offers. BYU has the oldest team in the NCAA because of this but Quirante didn't even have a rivals page whereas the twins had one since they were sophomores and Raelon Singleton has one after one year of varsity football. Forget 20-4a, that's what the rest of the state thinks. [/quote] by the way the guys that base their mortgage payments as you say didn't win at barbers hill and was 0-20 at warren as head coaches... be careful what you say [/quote]I'm not talking about high school coaches first of all, and I'm not talking about coaches from just Lamar. The whole NCAA missed on Montana? I think not, look at the signings I posted on  one of the other threads and you'll see the whole country from Alabama to Tarleton has been in the triangle recruiting. I guess they all missed on him. Never forget the 3,4,and 5 star transfer guys you're talking about transfer because there's other 3,4,and 5 star guys there. Those guys don't go to SFA or Lamar initially, and some that do transfer to those places is because you don't lose a year of eligibility when you transfer down a division. As far as beating the twins head up, watch out on that one. They averaged 10 ypc and gained 100 more yards that Vidor's offense. Don't mistake 3 yards and a cloud of dust ball control for anything other than it is. Aston dropped back and threw for well over 300 yards on Summer Creek,  Montana overthrew a wide open receiver by 20 yards and could barely make the ball spiral. Aston also has better wheels than Montana by the way and he'll play his senior season at 16 years old. If Vidor ran a conventional offense with MQ under the center the would get manhandled by most teams in the area and college recruiters know that, that's why he hasn't inked anywhere yet.

[quote name="tupac7" post="1377011" timestamp="1361416967"] I will admit I am biased...I like Montana as well as several other local talented athletes that I see in the area. I understand not all can get signed, but the BEST one in the area has me baffled. [/quote]Despite what Vidor fans think Montana isn't and wasn't the best player in the area. Recruiters have told y'all what I've been saying all along. Should he have won the offensive award? I think 1881 yards on 192 carries and 33 tds says yes, and he was well deserving. He had good defensive numbers for his position but there was a player from Nederland, Ozen (not Tony Brown), and WOS who had better numbers for their positions even though they didn't stand out like Montana's tackle numbers or his 3 picks. I'm not going to name them because I'm sure that will take us on another tangent. Just take the emotion out of it and ask what position does he actually play? He wasn't a better pure qb than Mitchell and Lamar signed him as an athlete. He wasn't a better pure rb than Glenn Roberts and he went D2. He not a better pure lb than Garrett Dolan (BH) and all he could get was an upstart HBU offer. With his measurables he needs to stand out in something besides heart which the recruiters have clearly told you he doesn't. Great high school football player but don't let the numbers he ran up in a gimmick offense sway y'all into thinking he's the best player in the Triangle because the guys that base their mortgage payments on evaluating high school players have definitively told you otherwise.  * I agree with whoever said he's going on a mission because he didn't get any worthwhile offers. BYU has the oldest team in the NCAA because of this but Quirante didn't even have a rivals page whereas the twins had one since they were sophomores and Raelon Singleton has one after one year of varsity football. Forget 20-4a, that's what the rest of the state thinks. 

[quote name="bronco1" post="1376493" timestamp="1361370806"] [quote author=coach bear link=topic=109592.msg1376486#msg1376486 date=1361369957] Did Price okay this --sign release saying not for athletic reasons??? why did he leave?? :-\ [/quote] I don't believe it is required since C.E. King has been deemed academically unacceptable by the State. Smart decision for him, if you can you should, Summercreek is going to be good again and for the foreseeable future. If he is good enough it will help him out, alot more competition for his position at SC than at King though. He might disappear into the crowd if he can't shine brighter than the rest of the stars. [/quote]Despite what some Creek fans may think about Keevon Aldridge or Jordan Braden, AJ Jeffery was the second best back in 19-4a last year and will be again this year barring injury. It's like I always say when evaluating rb's, "where is he making his first cut?" You put Austin Walter behind those boy from SC last year and he shatters the 2k yard mark, and don't tell me "we had two good back so they split time". When you have two that mean you don't have "the one". If I was a Creek fan I would expect around 1500 yards and numerous 50+ yard touchdown runs. I'm glad for Crosby though, we beat King 24-0 last year with Price calling his 2 plays so with no Jeffery that should be a layup when we make that right on the prkwy this year.

Post signing day compilation for majority of Texas kids that signed scholarships. [Hidden Content]

[quote name="ATX31" post="1376369" timestamp="1361335420"] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109433.msg1376359#msg1376359 date=1361334834] [quote author=Honest Abe link=topic=109433.msg1376351#msg1376351 date=1361334357] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109433.msg1376331#msg1376331 date=1361333027] [quote author=Honest Abe link=topic=109433.msg1375435#msg1375435 date=1361199164] [quote author=fisherman2 link=topic=109433.msg1375419#msg1375419 date=1361190273] Kelly getting back on the winning track did nothing for them! I am still 100% sure they are better than every team ahead of them besides Kountze. [/quote]Since the rankings are not comparing apples to apples, they should be based on the 'eyeball' method rather than wins/losses, IMO. Hard to do when there are so many teams to watch for consideration of the rankings. Nobody has seen Crosby or Humble play more than one game a piece, yet their number of wins place them high in the rankings since they were both 15-1 in district. I guess Crosby is ahead of Humbe bc they won the coin flip for the 1st seed! ;D [b]Humble won at Crosby early in district. Crosby won at Humble late in district, so Crosby is AHEAD by two spots. [/b] Ozen won at Ned early in district. Ned won at Ozen late in district, however Ned is two spots BEHIND Ozen. Ned also beat Silsbee twice, yet Silsbee is ahead of Ned. Also , HJ beat Ned, yet HJ is behind Ned in the rankings. They don't always make sense, but I realize they are just opinions. Kelly will never have a chance to prove they are better than the other schools bc they won't play this year. Again, way too hard to compare apples to oranges. Now that the playoffs are here, everyone has a chance to prove how good they really are! 8) [/quote]Crosby finished second because we lost AT Humble by two points and won at home by 12. Looks like y'all proved their point anyway with an 8 point loss to the 3rd place 20-4a team. [/quote]Huh?? Loss to a 3rd pl team?? We beat a #1 team by 8 who lost a flip and was seeded 2nd. [/quote]Ned finished 3rd in 20-4a but I was talking about why you said Crosby was in front of Humble. We lost in Humble by 2 pts and won at Crosby by 12 pts. Maybe we beat the sense of y'all so bad in football your memory is still bad. [Hidden Content]-(crosby,tx)/basketball/schedule.htm Congrats on giving us out first district loss in two years though. We're now 29-1 in the district over the last two seasons. Football season is around the corner though Abe, maybe you can switch allegiance to those other Humble boys up the road for the fall. [/quote] [b]We beat yall in football 21-7? Good try bro! Are yall that delusional or is Crosby school district that terrible in the math department.. probably both.[/b][/quote]What the bleep are you talking about? We're talking about the Humble and Crosby scores in football and basketball. My math is good sir, A&M made sure of that before they gave me my degree. By the way, go check the Crosby-Ned series lately. Crosby lost IN Nederland last year, before that we put y'all out of the playoffs twice and beat y'all in the regular season once. If we play this year it's going to be in Crosby and I'm sure the twins will have something to say about that their senior year.

[quote name="bigdog" post="1376361" timestamp="1361334890"] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109433.msg1376349#msg1376349 date=1361334127] [quote author=bigdog link=topic=109433.msg1376334#msg1376334 date=1361333256] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109433.msg1376331#msg1376331 date=1361333027] [quote author=Honest Abe link=topic=109433.msg1375435#msg1375435 date=1361199164] [quote author=fisherman2 link=topic=109433.msg1375419#msg1375419 date=1361190273] Kelly getting back on the winning track did nothing for them! I am still 100% sure they are better than every team ahead of them besides Kountze. [/quote]Since the rankings are not comparing apples to apples, they should be based on the 'eyeball' method rather than wins/losses, IMO. Hard to do when there are so many teams to watch for consideration of the rankings. Nobody has seen Crosby or Humble play more than one game a piece, yet their number of wins place them high in the rankings since they were both 15-1 in district. I guess Crosby is ahead of Humbe bc they won the coin flip for the 1st seed! ;D [b]Humble won at Crosby early in district. Crosby won at Humble late in district, so Crosby is AHEAD by two spots. [/b] Ozen won at Ned early in district. Ned won at Ozen late in district, however Ned is two spots BEHIND Ozen. Ned also beat Silsbee twice, yet Silsbee is ahead of Ned. Also , HJ beat Ned, yet HJ is behind Ned in the rankings. They don't always make sense, but I realize they are just opinions. Kelly will never have a chance to prove they are better than the other schools bc they won't play this year. Again, way too hard to compare apples to oranges. Now that the playoffs are here, everyone has a chance to prove how good they really are! 8) [/quote]Crosby finished second because we lost AT Humble by two points and won at home by 12. Looks like y'all proved their point anyway with an 8 point loss to the 3rd place 20-4a team. [/quote] [b]And you squeaked by the fourth place team.  Whats your point?[/b][/quote]Point is with both teams having nearly identical bodies of work there's a ten point +- differential for Crosby. I guess you think Ned squeaked by Humble too since y'all only won by 8? I wouldn't call a 9 point win a squeak though. Crosby unfortunately played to their competition instead of winning that on by 15 as they should have, look at PN-G's body of work and you can see they played up to theirs. Like I said before though, good job by the Indians even making it that close. [/quote] [b]We beat the 15-1 (28-8) team,  by 8.  You beat a team that was fourth place and was 7-7 and 12-18.[/b][/quote]We beat them by 17 and 7, what's you point. We'll beat y'all the same way. Hard for the kids to get up for a JV squad.

[quote name="Honest Abe" post="1376351" timestamp="1361334357"] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109433.msg1376331#msg1376331 date=1361333027] [quote author=Honest Abe link=topic=109433.msg1375435#msg1375435 date=1361199164] [quote author=fisherman2 link=topic=109433.msg1375419#msg1375419 date=1361190273] Kelly getting back on the winning track did nothing for them! I am still 100% sure they are better than every team ahead of them besides Kountze. [/quote]Since the rankings are not comparing apples to apples, they should be based on the 'eyeball' method rather than wins/losses, IMO. Hard to do when there are so many teams to watch for consideration of the rankings. Nobody has seen Crosby or Humble play more than one game a piece, yet their number of wins place them high in the rankings since they were both 15-1 in district. I guess Crosby is ahead of Humbe bc they won the coin flip for the 1st seed! ;D [b]Humble won at Crosby early in district. Crosby won at Humble late in district, so Crosby is AHEAD by two spots. [/b] Ozen won at Ned early in district. Ned won at Ozen late in district, however Ned is two spots BEHIND Ozen. Ned also beat Silsbee twice, yet Silsbee is ahead of Ned. Also , HJ beat Ned, yet HJ is behind Ned in the rankings. They don't always make sense, but I realize they are just opinions. Kelly will never have a chance to prove they are better than the other schools bc they won't play this year. Again, way too hard to compare apples to oranges. Now that the playoffs are here, everyone has a chance to prove how good they really are! 8) [/quote]Crosby finished second because we lost AT Humble by two points and won at home by 12. Looks like y'all proved their point anyway with an 8 point loss to the 3rd place 20-4a team. [/quote]Huh?? Loss to a 3rd pl team?? We beat a #1 team by 8 who lost a flip and was seeded 2nd. [/quote]Ned finished 3rd in 20-4a but I was talking about why you said Crosby was in front of Humble. We lost in Humble by 2 pts and won at Crosby by 12 pts. Maybe we beat the sense of y'all so bad in football your memory is still bad. [Hidden Content]-(crosby,tx)/basketball/schedule.htm Congrats on giving us out first district loss in two years though. We're now 29-1 in the district over the last two seasons. Football season is around the corner though Abe, maybe you can switch allegiance to those other Humble boys up the road for the fall.

[quote name="bigdog" post="1376334" timestamp="1361333256"] [quote author=cougar14 link=topic=109433.msg1376331#msg1376331 date=1361333027] [quote author=Honest Abe link=topic=109433.msg1375435#msg1375435 date=1361199164] [quote author=fisherman2 link=topic=109433.msg1375419#msg1375419 date=1361190273] Kelly getting back on the winning track did nothing for them! I am still 100% sure they are better than every team ahead of them besides Kountze. [/quote]Since the rankings are not comparing apples to apples, they should be based on the 'eyeball' method rather than wins/losses, IMO. Hard to do when there are so many teams to watch for consideration of the rankings. Nobody has seen Crosby or Humble play more than one game a piece, yet their number of wins place them high in the rankings since they were both 15-1 in district. I guess Crosby is ahead of Humbe bc they won the coin flip for the 1st seed! ;D [b]Humble won at Crosby early in district. Crosby won at Humble late in district, so Crosby is AHEAD by two spots. [/b] Ozen won at Ned early in district. Ned won at Ozen late in district, however Ned is two spots BEHIND Ozen. Ned also beat Silsbee twice, yet Silsbee is ahead of Ned. Also , HJ beat Ned, yet HJ is behind Ned in the rankings. They don't always make sense, but I realize they are just opinions. Kelly will never have a chance to prove they are better than the other schools bc they won't play this year. Again, way too hard to compare apples to oranges. Now that the playoffs are here, everyone has a chance to prove how good they really are! 8) [/quote]Crosby finished second because we lost AT Humble by two points and won at home by 12. Looks like y'all proved their point anyway with an 8 point loss to the 3rd place 20-4a team. [/quote] [b]And you squeaked by the fourth place team.  Whats your point?[/b][/quote]Point is with both teams having nearly identical bodies of work there's a ten point +- differential for Crosby. I guess you think Ned squeaked by Humble too since y'all only won by 8? I wouldn't call a 9 point win a squeak though. Crosby unfortunately played to their competition instead of winning that on by 15 as they should have, look at PN-G's body of work and you can see they played up to theirs. Like I said before though, good job by the Indians even making it that close.