-
Posts
2,970 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
34
OlDawg last won the day on February 22
OlDawg had the most liked content!
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
La Porte
-
Interests
Grandkids, Fishing, Football, Baseball.
Recent Profile Visitors
-
Out of Coverage Area: La Porte vs Austin Anderson, Round 3
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in High School Girls Basketball
Lady Dawgs 57 Austin Anderson 36 Final La Porte moves on to 5A D1 Regional Finals -
Out of Coverage Area: La Porte vs Austin Anderson, Round 3
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in High School Girls Basketball
Lady Dawgs 47 Austin Anderson 25 Start of 4th period -
Out of Coverage Area: La Porte vs Austin Anderson, Round 3
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in High School Girls Basketball
Lady Dawgs 26 Austin Anderson 11 Half -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Nothing wrong with that. It’s probably better for most. Like I say, our stuff is pretty boring. But, I like boring…and dividends. When we buy, it’s after as much research as we can do because we intend to hold. I feel like, if it’s good enough to buy in the first place, I want it to be good enough to hold. Not just some flash in the pan. I encourage everyone that can to get in the Market as early as possible. Like @thetragichippy said, history is on your side with patience. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Yes & no. I have a broker with Ed Jones. But, I usually do the investigation, check with him because he has all the access to Morningstar that I don’t, he’s a CFP we’ve used for well over a decade & knows us, and he watches everything closer than us. So, kind of a team effort. The NLR I spoke about, I told him I wanted nuclear for the AI expansion, and he researched this ETF as the ‘best’ one in his mind. He’s recommended some things, and others we ask him to purchase. We typically buy and hold. We’re not what you’d call traders. Our holdings are what most would consider boring. -
thetragichippy reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
I am still holding. I buy good companies with solid history, and good divvies. ETF’s are just a basket like mutual funds that are treated like stock, so they’re more liquid and don’t have the fees mutual funds typically do. I was hoping to buy more of one I own already purchased last year (NLR - a side play on AI & nuclear power generation), but they didn’t drop as much as I’d hoped and I also got a little skittish. NLR is the ticker if interested. We bought about a year ago. It’s done what I’d hoped so far. I think nuclear is a good bet with all the data centers coming online. But, just a guess like the casino. Hopefully, a little better odds. We obviously have a majority in investments as it’s our income. I move around. But, don’t ever remove except for a monthly check for us to live on. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Y’all go back and forth so much, it’s hard to tell. Do you feel comfortable enough to invest extra in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etf’s, or anything besides fixed income right now? I ask to see how comfortable you—or anyone else who wants to reply—is in the economy right now. -
OlDawg reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
U.S. has breached trade deal and Europe is ready to retaliate, top trade lawmaker tells CNBC [Hidden Content] Remember, the EU is our largest trading partner. This was a key trade deal. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
For what, making up less than 1/2 of the loss? I take it you’ve bought more then today since you feel so good about it? You should be worried about long-term issues. EU has delayed signing their trade deal, as have all the rest. I may not have slammed him for the markets. But, he’s doing a great deal of damage. The ones who slam for a day swing in the markets up or down, don’t need to be in the market. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
What about them? -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Trump Claims He Doesn’t Need Congress For Tariffs—Why That’s True Yet Misleading [Hidden Content] -
HangPDFs reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
OlDawg reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
Boyz N Da Hood reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
I’ll pass. If I retired way early, not sure the best advice is to take advice from someone who didn’t. lol -
OlDawg reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Typically, I’m a selective buyer in situations like this. It’s one of the reasons I was able to retire very early, and live off investments for the last 10+ years. Not right now. His behavior and its effects for longer term uncertainty have me on hold. Not long after his 150 days are up, we’ll have mid-terms to add another level of uncertainty. I’ll just watch and hold for a bit. Not a seller. Just not a buyer. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
He’ll try to justify another section to impose ‘tougher’ tariffs long term according to his thinking. Since he’s flapping his yaps again, he’s already providing ammo for future lawsuits. The ‘other means’ you mention aren’t illegal by default. They have to be justified, and appropriately used. But, there will still be lawsuits. There will still be uncertainty for businesses. That means slower growth for the economy as a whole. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Not sure what you’re asking. IEEPA was done immediately upon SCOTUS ruling. Tariff collection under IEEPA was stopped.