tdavis9

*Mod edit - Do not bash players **

Another lose by lumberton look like I gonna be right about them not gonna win a game all year till they get a real qb in there

Walker was hurt last night aj has the job back as te rb qb and wr... That boy can catch

[quote name="RaiderGirl92" post="1284427" timestamp="1348867432"] Go Raiders!!! [/quote] Boooooo. Indians all the way to state

Png...sort just got off work

other sites have there rankings just like his

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1276312" timestamp="1348099101"] [quote author=tdavis9 link=topic=103304.msg1276309#msg1276309 date=1348099003] 1 Pearland Dawson (2-0) 2 Angleton (3-0) 3 Dayton (3-0) 4 Brenham (2-1) 5 Summer Creek (2-0) 6 Pflugerville Connally (2-1) 7 Houston Stratford (2-1) 8 FB Marshall (2-0) 9 Friendswoo (3-0) 10 Rosenberg Terry (2-1) 11 Nederland (2-1) 12 Port Neches-Groves (1-2) 13 Vidor (3-0) 14 Croby (2-0) 15 Montgomery (1-2) we are ranked higher than vidor :))) [/quote] What poll is this? [/quote] texashsfootball.com

1 Pearland Dawson (2-0) 2 Angleton (3-0) 3 Dayton (3-0) 4 Brenham (2-1) 5 Summer Creek (2-0) 6 Pflugerville Connally (2-1) 7 Houston Stratford (2-1) 8 FB Marshall (2-0) 9 Friendswoo (3-0) 10 Rosenberg Terry (2-1) 11 Nederland (2-1) 12 Port Neches-Groves (1-2) 13 Vidor (3-0) 14 Croby (2-0) 15 Montgomery (1-2) png is higher than vidor lmao

1 Pearland Dawson (2-0) 2 Angleton (3-0) 3 Dayton (3-0) 4 Brenham (2-1) 5 Summer Creek (2-0) 6 Pflugerville Connally (2-1) 7 Houston Stratford (2-1) 8 FB Marshall (2-0) 9 Friendswoo (3-0) 10 Rosenberg Terry (2-1) 11 Nederland (2-1) 12 Port Neches-Groves (1-2) 13 Vidor (3-0) 14 Croby (2-0) 15 Montgomery (1-2) we are ranked higher than vidor :)))

summer creek

[quote name="RaiderGirl92" post="1275713" timestamp="1348029847"] [quote author=tdavis9 link=topic=103304.msg1275705#msg1275705 date=1348028887] [quote author=RaiderGirl92 link=topic=103304.msg1274422#msg1274422 date=1347908163] Gotta go with my boys!!! RAIDERS :) [/quote] u are crazy png-45 lum-0 SINCE THEY CANT SCORE [/quote] You would comment about my post!!! I'm sorry that I support my boys!!! [/quote] see u at game...might want to come sit on winning side....game will get ugly real fast.

[quote name="RaiderGirl92" post="1274422" timestamp="1347908163"] Gotta go with my boys!!! RAIDERS :) [/quote] u are crazy png-45 lum-0 SINCE THEY CANT SCORE

ned 60 vidor-7

[quote name="mytwocents" post="1273962" timestamp="1347852360"] [quote author=bigdog link=topic=103187.msg1273956#msg1273956 date=1347851598] Your point was the D1 running back was gone. Mine was he wasn't the one that ran for the most yards.  Most of thier team came back from last year. [/quote] Only because we shut him down which opened it up for other runningbacks. [/quote] nederland would of scored 200 on santa fe.....how many did yall score again

summer creek

ozen is good

[quote name="supergold82" post="1272469" timestamp="1347725890"] [quote author=tdavis9 link=topic=103187.msg1272448#msg1272448 date=1347724852] nederland by 3 tds ...they have better offense and defense then vidor [/quote]I believe I can see smoke coming out of tdavis9 back side. No way the Dogs beat Vidor by 3 tds at home. Get the crack out of your PEACE PIPE. [/quote] u must not know nederland who was vidor played..some no name teams ...and who has nederland played ranked teams in the STATE .and alomst beat the number 3 team in state last night...come on now vidor is no where near close to nederland....just cuz u said that vidor will get shoutout all they do is run and nederland stops that

nederland by 3 tds ...they have better offense and defense then vidor

[quote name="football04" post="1271970" timestamp="1347684024"] wow, is Lumberton that bad, they may not score this year. [/quote] they scored last week

there was a article in the paper about it a while back.

[quote name="SmashMouth" post="1267632" timestamp="1347386444"] [quote author=tdavis9 link=topic=102898.msg1267629#msg1267629 date=1347386177] [quote author=RaiderGirl92 link=topic=102898.msg1266881#msg1266881 date=1347312590] Win or not I still pull for my Raiders. So that being said Lumberton wins :) [/quote] lumberton will not win this one they lost all there good players to legacy....but they will come out swinging [/quote] That is an unfactual opinion...a mere myth...they did not lose ALL their good players to Legacy... [/quote] actually they did there was a article about it

[quote name="RaiderGirl92" post="1266881" timestamp="1347312590"] Win or not I still pull for my Raiders. So that being said Lumberton wins :) [/quote] lumberton will not win this one they lost all there good players to legacy....but they will come out swinging

there is no way they win by 40 though that is why i bet that lol now if they let me down i will be spending lots of money lmao

nederland is not overconfident ...they are in the top 8 for a reason ..they are one of few teams they have great offense and great d.

[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1266504" timestamp="1347250732"] [quote author=tdavis9 link=topic=102809.msg1266501#msg1266501 date=1347250473] [quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=102809.msg1266493#msg1266493 date=1347249338] [quote author=tdavis9 link=topic=102809.msg1266491#msg1266491 date=1347248854] they will not win by 40 plus...if they do i will buy dinner after game [/quote] yall better have a running clock going after the 1st qtr lol  :D [/quote] just like wos was gonna win by 40  ::) [/quote]somebody said that? [/quote] yepp