bullets13

That will help some. But I don’t believe the demand for cheap adoptions will come close to keeping up with the amount of unwanted babies, so they’re going to have to figure out some other ways to take care of them.

I’m saying that there will be drastically more unwanted babies than there were before Roe vs. Wade, and your question of “how did we manage all of the unwanted babies before 1973” is irrelevant.

Without a doubt. I still bet she got a very nice raise to do it.

I’m really not going to get drawn into a debate about abortion, but I will answer your question with two critical facts you’re forgetting: 1. the population of the US has grown from 200M to 330M in the last 50 years. That’s a massive increase. 2. While there’s no way for me to measure it, I would say that people’s willingness and ability to be accountable for their actions has dropped by a massive amount, and nuclear families are at an all-time low. so you’re going to have exponentially more unwanted babies than you had 50 years ago, and you have a couple of generations currently at the baby making age consisting of many people who have no sense of accountability or responsibility for their actions, with more of these worthless generations coming up the pipeline. all that to say, the number of unwanted babies is likely to be triple or quadruple what they were 50 years ago, and those babies 50 years ago weren’t exactly well taken care of.

Can’t blame her for doing what’s best for him, although I’m quite sure a job magically opened up for her with a nice pay raise to get him over there

I’m sure his family moved there for work…

[Hidden Content]

That’s why I say make it a minute. Teams can still slow it waaaay down, but you won’t see teams holding for the last shot with 3 minutes left in the half, or stuff like the campfire formation that lumberton tried this past season. Also, if it’s an even minute refs can monitor it pretty easily. Maybe start motioning down from ten seconds like they do in the back court to warn the players. It wouldn’t be perfect, but if a team held the ball a full 60 seconds I wouldn’t really care if they got screwed on a bad shot clock call once in awhile.

I’m just glad Texas doesn’t have to play Tennessee.

I know you guys are against the shot clock, but I’m all for it. Even if it was something like a minute, just to force SOME action to prevent total stall ball. That would still be more than enough time for your fundamentally slow offenses to eat clock and get a shot off.

I hope they do something with it. Having the ability to do it and actually following through are two different things.

Teachers have options as well. A fingerprint safe can be opened in seconds, while students have zero access to the gun.

[Hidden Content]

Teachers who carry go through fairly extensive training and a psych evaluation.

I have no issue with that, but It’s a catch-22. The government needs a steady supply of 18-year-olds with limited prospects to keep the armed forces well-manned, but an 18-year-old is not far removed (and often case not removed at all) from being an immature kid. On the flip side, there are plenty of other things that 18-year-old soldiers have to wait to do until they’re 21.

I can answer this one for you. To be clear, I’m pro 2A, don’t want guns banned, etc. etc. But the reason that strict gun laws work in Australia and the UK is that they’re nationwide. Guns in those countries have been greatly restricted, with many banned, confiscated, and destroyed. Chicago, NYC, and San Francisco’s laws, while stricter than the rest of the country, don’t even come close to the countries mentioned. In Australia, for instance, one must demonstrate a legitimate need for gun ownership (self defense is not considered), must be licensed, every gun is registered, and there’s a very restrictive list of who can and can’t own them. The types of guns you can own and their capacities are also greatly limited. These laws are applicable nationwide. In England one can get sporting rifles and shotguns with a license. Handguns have been almost entirely banned, and as we all know, pistols account for the overwhelming majority of our gun crimes due to being easily concealable and much easier to use in a crime. On the other hand, criminals in the US, no matter how strict the laws are in their cities, are just a short drive away from much more lenient gun laws. There are also still legal means to buy guns in those cities, and a ready supply of legal guns to acquire illegally. So while the cities you mention may have more laws on the books and harsher punishments for gun crimes, it’s impossible for them to actually keep criminals from getting them. That said, attempting to ban guns at this point is akin to shutting the barn door after the horse is already out of the stable. There are over 400M guns in circulation in the US. Removing them from law abiding citizens will only put them in more danger from the criminals who will not turn theirs in. As for your comparison, though, it’s apples and oranges, or as TVC likes to say, apples and rocks.

In the novel I typed previously on this thread I stated that I think raising the age to buy high capacity rifles to 21 might help. 3 extra years of maturity, and 3 years away from the angst and emotions of high school would likely stop some of these shootings. Stiffer penalties for anyone who allows a shooter access to firearms might help as well.

Saw a news report that this is where he bought the guns.

This story hurt me to hear about. I teach at an elementary, and the idea of what those kids went through makes me sick to my stomach. I’m staunchly pro-2A, but also want our kids to be safe in a place where they absolutely should be safe always. So many of our students go to school and get to feel safe from domestic violence and abuse that they have to live with at home. They should never have to worry about violence following them there. I read through this whole thread, and there are a lot of things I agree with, some that I don’t. I wholeheartedly support arming (willing) teachers, and also finding a way to have an officer at every school. While it would not be a 100% preventative, it would greatly reduce the odds of someone choosing a school as a target, and if they still did, it would greatly reduce the odds that they pull off an effective attack. Secure doors would also help. There’s a video of this guy going into the school circulating online, and he literally just opened the door and walked in. Our school is very serious about keeping doors locked, but they’re all glass and would be easily breached. I would like to see that changed. While I don’t like to see a lot of gun legislation added, one law that I think would help to some degree is changing the laws to restrict the purchase of long guns, or at least long guns that can hold high capacity magazines to the age of 21. We already do this with handguns. If some of these kids get a few years to separate themselves from the angst, bullying, and hormone fueled stupidity of high school they might very well not make a decision to take innocent lives out of anger. It will also provide 3 extra years for them to possibly get some help. A lot of the symptoms of mental illness that families might hide or ignore will manifest when these kids graduate and have to start doing adult things, meaning others outside of the family might be able to do something. And yes, I understand that someone can do a lot of damage with a shotgun, but I’d rather a potential killer have to painstakingly hand load 5 shells every few seconds rather than dropping a mag and reloading 30 rounds almost instantaneously. One thing that nearly every school shooter has in common is that they’re under the age of 21. Which leads me to my next point: any parents who allow a child access to guns who then subsequently shoots up a school should be punished severely, especially if there were any warning signs whatsoever that the shooter had issues. My kids hunt with me, and as they get a little older I’ll teach them how to handle and shoot firearms. But all of my guns stay in a safe behind an oak door that they’ll never have a key to, minus my daily carry, which they also can’t get to. There’s no excuse for a parent to allow a kid access to firearms if they know they’re unstable, and I’ve yet to see one of these shootings perpetrated by someone who hadn’t exhibited obvious warning signs. Anyone who purchases a gun for a kid (an older friend, family member, etc.) should also have the book thrown at them if they use them in an attack. I do believe that kids who hunt should be allowed access to them, including high capacity rifles, but better laws on the books putting the responsibility of the kids’ action with those guns would likely help parents take an honest look at their kids’ mental states before letting them use them. As for social media monitoring, I agree it’s a slippery slope. I do believe if given that power then liberals would use any such law to disarm law abiding citizens. That said, if someone actually makes direct threats, by all means put them on a list and prevent them from buying guns. Anyone receiving psychiatric treatment and diagnosed with certain mental illnesses should not be allowed to purchase guns. I also wouldn’t be opposed to some sort of law punishing anyone who knows about a direct threat in advance that doesn’t come forward. It seems to be a pretty common theme that someone pops up after a shooting saying something like “he told me he was going to do it, but I didn’t actually think he was serious.” I sincerely hope that we can figure out something as a society to stop these shootings. Better mental health awareness, consequences for those who allow access to guns to mentally Ill people, and better school security is a great place to start. I’m thankful to work for a district that allows teachers to carry, but there are still things I would like to see done to make us even safer. There are nearly 140,000 schools in the US, and the idea that any law or policy can prevent something that occurs randomly at 1 or 2 of them every year or two is nonsensical. But we can certainly do more to help people with mental illness and prepare schools to better handle and possibly stop a shooting if and when they happen.

Saw that game as well. He couldn’t miss!

Seems like a dumb mistake to make, or to choose to make.

yes. But Toby gets 9, because he's Toby.

Has it been confirmed that Anahuac is his destination?

This district will be very competitive next year. EC only lost one senior. Anahuac only graduated two. OF moves down and only graduated one. Kountze was young and will improve. Buna brings back their all-region point guard, but loses 6 seniors. I'll say: 1. Kountze 2. EC 3. OF 4. Buna 5. Anahuac

He's a wonderful coach. That said, them not bringing a state championship home during Angel Bullock's four years there is up there with HJ girls not winning a state championship with Ashlyn Jackson.