bullets13

That's what you got from the post I just made? Okay. Like I said, if you don't want to interact, quit using my name. If not, when you call people stupid and insult them, quit getting upset when they do it back.

I'm not sure what you said in the title, but I didn't have anything to do with it being deleted, and didn't even know the thread existed. Maybe you weren't as diplomatic as I was? I didn't insult you, just repeated what you'd said. I'm not sure how I "can't take it when someone gives it back to me?" You've said all kinds of things, and I've "taken" them all. 3rd grade insults don't hurt my feelings. I enjoy going back and forth with people. If it bothered me I wouldn't keep coming back on here. And If I was that worried about you, I would've given you a ban for profanity the other day when you slipped up and used it. But since it wasn't directed at anyone, and wasn't that bad of a word, I just ignored it. By rule of the site, and your five previous profanity warnings, it would've been well within my responsibilities as a mod to permanently ban you. Don't give yourself too much credit. If you're concerned about it, maybe keep my name out of your mouth. I made a conscious decision to quit interacting with you a few days ago for the sake of civil conversations in the political forum, but every time I open the site you're bringing me up again. I'll admit that I went back on my decision and goaded you along (and had fun doing it). For all your accusations, it really feels like YOU are the one who likes to dish it, but can't take it. That said, quit bringing me up and I'll quit responding. You can go back to posting whatever you want (within site rules), and I'll go back to posting whatever I want (within site rules).

Nice win!

I didn’t delete your post. I also haven’t posted any opinions of whether or not a child should get the vaccine. I honestly don’t know what you’re talking about. I assure you that nothing you’ve ever posted has embarrassed me. When did you make the post that you think I deleted? The only thing I ever deleted of yours was about 6 weeks ago when you and I went waaaaay off the rails in a thread, and I deleted my posts in that incident as well. I let everyone know i did it and why. Oh, and one time before that when I warned you for profanity, but I wasn’t even involved in that discussion.

[Hidden Content] The new guidance still calls for wearing masks in crowded indoor settings like buses, planes, hospitals, prisons and homeless shelters, but will help clear the way for reopening workplaces, schools, and other venues — even removing the need for masks or social distancing for those who are fully vaccinated.

I think Chester's open? Just happened to see it on a different site after reading this post this morning.

Will do!

Edited out profanity only, not anyone's content.

huh?

lol.

As someone who's never been particularly interested in Lamar basketball, all of this local talent means I'll go see a few games next year.

Bump.

I said I was done talking to you, but every time I try to quit you say something so moronic or hypocritical that I get sucked back in. But yeah, definitely not a credible link... it references direct quotes from the CDC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and a well known reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialist. But you find a heart doctor posting on a tabloid site saying something bad about the vaccine and wet yourself in excitement. Go look for Brent Bost on youtube. It'll give you something else to drool about. He used to be a local gynecologist, so you might already know him. He won't give you any ammunition to try and claim that the vaccine causes infertility, but he is an unqualified doctor with strong feelings about the vaccine, which you love. Anyway, you can go sit back in the corner with your toys. I really am done talking to you. It's like trying to explain to a toddler why they can't have an ice cream cone before dinner.

[Hidden Content]

here you go... how safe is the vaccine? Bearing in mind that I have sufficiently shown that many, if not most, of these deaths are coincidental (funny how you still haven't answered my question)... Over 245 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through May 3, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 4,178 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. I'd say that's a pretty good survival rate, even if all of those are vaccine deaths, which we know not to be the case. "I hope for everyone’s sake there’s no long term risk like women becoming infertile." - (non-fearmongerer) Realville As you would say, since there's literally no reason to think this would be the case, and no data to suggest this is a possibility, this is a "stupid argument". I'm not arguing that there may be some unknown side effect that arises in the future, because sure, there's always that possibility. but for someone who's "against fearmongering" you literally just made up one of the scariest possible side effects and said "hope this doesn't happen." Don't get the shot because there's a possibility that down the road your testicles may explode, because we don't know about future side effects. See how dumb that sounds? Anyway, I'm done on this one. Any future replies and you'll be talking to yourself.

VAERS goes so far as to discredit itself on it's website. I already posted that. They do it so tinfoil hatters such as yourself can't use their numbers as fact, which you've already done anyway. i'll ask again: If 8,000 people a day die in the US, and over 130,000,000 have been vaccinated (most of them TWICE), would it not stand to reason that thousands of people will die after receiving the vaccine of other causes?

if you're talking about in general, I agree. The danger of both covid and the vaccine have been misrepresented and used for political gain by people on both side of the fence. if you're talking about the fence that realville and myself are arguing across, I would have to disagree. I'm literally using basic statistics and irrefutable numbers to make a common sense point. He just says whatever pops into his head or uses smoke and mirrors to change the subject, or says how stupid my point is while offering literally no discernable rebuttal.

speaking of losing an argument... real numbers you can't refute? blah blah blah, Fauci's a liar. good point. i agree. what does that have to do with what I'm talking about? Nothing.

I pointed it out because you kept using words like "stupid" to describe my arguments. you keep accusing me of making things up, but all I'm doing is applying statistics and percentages to data. Then you actually make things up. It's hilarious. You're on a crusade, which sure, whatever, do what you want, and you keep regurgitating the same info from one or two doctors that goes against basically everything that 99% of doctors are saying. That's also fine. But I could post equally compelling arguments for getting the vaccine from basically ALL OTHER DOCTORS, and you'd be like "nah, vaccine bad, covid stupid, realville right." anyway, i'm still waiting on your answer to my question (isn't that how this game works?): If 8,000 people a day die in the US, and over 130,000,000 have been vaccinated (most of them TWICE), would it not stand to reason that thousands of people will die after receiving the vaccine of other causes? Like you stated, you shouldn't need a college degree to answer this one.

You accuse people of making unfounded statements, and then in the same breath come up with stuff like this gem of a run-on sentence that I bolded for you. It's math, not gibberish, but I'm sure it sounds like it to you. I know it's a lot to process without a good grasp on math. I don't know if you're just that dumb, or are being intentionally dense, but I'll ask you a question, and see if I get an answer: If 8,000 people a day die in the US, and over 130,000,000 have been vaccinated (most of them TWICE), would it not stand to reason that thousands of people will die after receiving the vaccine of other causes? I'll give you a hint, the answer is yes, but please, since my mathematical explanation is "gibberish", if you think it's no, explain why. And don't say "nobody could even know that", because it's literally all based on normal death daily death rates factored into the % of the population that's been vaccinated. I didn't even factor in the fact that the death rate of the vaccinated population would be much higher due to the makeup of those being vaccinated (elderly, pre-existing conditions). If you looked at another group of 130,000,000 Americans who had NOT been vaccinated, thousands of them would also die during the same time period. As to your other point, which also shows your political bias and lack of common sense, if EVERY death reported to VAERS was directly related to the vaccine (which it is not), and HALF of the reported covid deaths were wrongly reported (which nowhere that many were), you're looking at 4,000 Vaccine deaths vs. around 300,000 covid deaths, even though at this point more people have been vaccinated than infected with Covid. I wonder which is more dangerous... Realville MD says people should worry about the vaccine and take their chances with Covid. Seems legit, considering his math skillz and mastery of their/there/they're and your/you're.

To break the numbers down further: 1.2M Americans are being vaccinated daily. 8000 Americans die daily. If you find the % of Americans that die on a daily basis, and apply it to the 1.2M being vaccinated daily, approximately 26.4 people from that population number would be expected to die on a daily basis. Extend that to a week and you’re looking at almost 200 people from that population group. At the peak, over 2M Americans were vaccinated daily. Out of a population group of 2M Americans, on average around 50 will die daily. It’s not rocket science to see how the number of coincidental deaths after vaccination is going to rise well into the thousands considering over how long of a time period huge amounts of at-risk people have been vaccinated daily. Again, I’m not claiming that nobody has died from the vaccine. I have no way of knowing that, or how many it’s been. But a report to VAERS is nowhere close to a confirmed vaccine death, and they say as much on their website. But even if all 4000 deaths reported to VAERS were directly related to the vaccine (which they most certainly are not), you’re looking at a death rate of around .0017% for those who’ve taken the vaccine, and again, simple math shows that with a population group of this size, there will be MANY coincidental deaths, so the death rate is much lower than .0017, which is beyond negligible as it is.

Taken directly from the VAERS website: Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information. The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines

You’re accusing me of making stuff up, while in the same breath saying 3000 people have died FROM the vaccine. There’s zero proof that they died from the vaccine, and you have “no way of knowing” that they did. I applied simple math to show why when you’re dealing with over 100,000,000 million people, some of them are going to die. I’ll use smaller numbers so that you can understand. If one out of ten people die a week, and ten people get the vaccine and then one dies, it’s unlikely he died from the vaccine. Still too complicated? If one out of two people die a week, and two people get the vaccine and one dies, he probably didn’t die from vaccine. I never realized that using simple statistics to formulate odds and averages is “stupid justification”, but I’m sure it sounds stupid when you aren’t intelligent enough to understand how math works.

Wish I'd been keeping up with this one as it happened.

Having played soccer my whole life, I'm a huge fan of the men's national team, and have always supported the women's team as well. I could go off on a tangent about the inequalities between A) the competition the two teams face and B ) the way they're compensated. I won't, but I assure you it's ridiculous the differences in what the men's and women's teams receive. The women were offered the exact same deal as the men, but refused it and negotiated for other things. Now they're claiming they're being treated unfairly because the men make more $ per game, and they want the same amount as the men. Remember, the women had that offer and refused it. It's all about greed and an overinflated view of what their product is worth.