bullets13

Nobody could make a PK! HJ missed 3, and Lumberton missed 3, but.... HJ keeper saved one as well! HJ advances with a 0-0, 2-1 penalty shootout win!

Going to a shootout. Lumberton put the ball in the net with about :30 last, but as best as I could tell from the fb feed I’m watching the keeper must’ve pushed the ball up off of the fg bar and back into play. Ref ended up giving a corner on the play

Lumberton came close in the first OT, but didn’t score. 0-0 going to the final ten minutes

Overtime! Hawks playing with a ton of heart in this one.

8 min left, still scoreless

Scoreless at the half

I’m a moderate Republican (well, I’d be a libertarian if the party had any relevance). I don’t get bent out of shape over some of the same things that your more right-leaning republicans do. That being said, I think the idea that the left is peddling that being forced to prove you are who you say you are to vote is absurd. The goal should be a transparent, fair voting system where every true vote is counted, and where voter fraud is eliminated. If the left is so concerned about people on the margins of society being able to vote, there are easy policies that can be implemented to ensure that everyone who wants to can get the means needed to legally vote. By pushing for methods of voting that will be easily manipulated by fraud, it’s hard not to conclude that fraud is one of the primary objectives.

What's funny to me is on a different site there are some super salty Tech fans right now questioning his honor because he broke his 6-year contract after two years. If you don't know why this is hilarious, go google "Chris Beard UNLV".

I didn't hate Shaka, but i'm excited about Beard.

got my second about 20 minutes ago.

I think i would as well.

The scariest part about Biden is you don't know if he's lying on purpose, someone fed him the lie, or if he just got really confused.

You’re one of those folks who “deserve” an answer and explanation to every question, no matter how ridiculous, but also deserve to be able to say whatever you want and it’s supposed to be taken as fact, with no questioning allowed. If someone calls you out, proves you wrong, you just change the subject and demand answers to something unrelated, using it as an excuse to ignore being exposed. I get it. Don’t worry about it. I don’t really need an answer. I already know it. I’m done on here.

And you keep refusing to address the fact that you claimed a death rate of .03% from Johns Hopkins, and I provided you with a link from them showing death rates hundreds of times higher. He’s complaining that they’re being told to call it Covid when it’s most likely Covid, but they don’t have concrete proof. I get it. The vast majority of those cases were going to be Covid. Someone dies from pneumonia, didn’t get a Covid test, but was found to be exposed to a close family member who had Covid after the fact. Call it Covid. That’s his complaint. Complaint addressed.

Anyone without a grasp of your and you’re talking about IQs is playing themselves.

lol. Ironic that you’re here to protect him from “not getting an answer” that’s been given a half dozen times.

Same, but dance for my daughter, not baseball.

I still don’t understand how death rates for different age groups is somehow relevant now. And again, even if our corrupt system has fabricated a quarter of the Covid deaths (which I do not believe), the real numbers are still staggering. I really am done now. You quoted JH, I provided JH numbers that clearly refuted your argument, and now I’m supposed to look at other JH numbers that don’t have anything to do with what you were claiming, and have nothing to do with your argument? Why don’t you tell me what I’m supposed to gather from those numbers? That old people die more? We already know that. That doesn’t mean their deaths are okay because they’re old.

Hahahaha. That’s some serious spin there. Are you implying that the readers of all ages who read your generalized statement should’ve been able to gather that you were only talking about people from a certain age? Anyone with an IQ over 70 knows you were trying to say that that was the death rate for everyone.

It took you 12 hours to respond to me from last night. Were you thinking of a response, or maybe busy doing something else? And yes, you claimed that the total survival rate was 99.97. Here I’ll quote you below. Also, I’m not surprised that you don’t care about people from 3rd world countries. I’m familiar with differing death rates by age. It’s irrelevant to me how old someone is who dies. They’re still dead, and I’m sure they’d prefer to be alive. Cat got your tongue on me continually proving you make up numbers and sources? I’m done for the night. So don’t stay up wondering (or as you would say, wandering) why I’m taking so long to answer when you say the same thing over and over again and don’t address your false numbers. Oh, and your video shows a doctor saying that if a patient probably died of Covid 19, you should put that as a cause. Okay. I can see how a few deaths might be misdiagnosed.

Realville, despite you making up things, posting fake sources, etc. I do agree that death % will be artificially inflated to some degree. If everyone who has had Covid with no symptoms that was never tested was counted, the number of cases would go up, and the death % would go down. The thing is, many of these cases ARE counted, because people are with no symptoms are tested for various reasons, like contact tracing, travel, etc (I’ve been tested twice with no symptoms to be able to return to work after close contact exposures). That being said, let’s say 20% of all cases have gone undiagnosed (which I think is very high, and unlikely). The current world death rate is 3%. If it dropped to 2% (which is almost certainly a gross overestimate of decrease) due to undiagnosed cases, the numbers are still staggering, and astronomically higher than your .03 death rate you claim. There are also certainly Covid deaths that aren’t attributed to Covid, namely in underdeveloped countries and deaths that occurred here before China ever admitted Covid existed, which would raise the death rate back up to some degree.

Dude, you have no reading comprehension. Like none. I did answer your question. I didn't come up with numbers, YOUR SOURCE, Johns Hopkins did. you're hilarious. A proven liar who demands answers and sources after lying about answers and sources. Please, since I answered your question (again), can you tell me where you came up with 99.97? Originally you said Johns Hopkins, then posted a Breitbart article that didn't actually verify anything. You ready to own up to the fact that you just made it up? Also, what does age breakdown matter? I'm sure it does to you. This actually all makes sense now. Since you aren't in the most at risk age groups, this thing really isn't all that dangerous, and who cares what the true death rates are, right? 99.97 is probably the survival rate for your age range, aka the only age range that matters to you. You’re just tired of being inconvenienced for the well-being of others. Congrats on that.

I came up with it the same way you came up with 99.97. Just kidding, you made that number up, while I used one of the most trusted medical sources in the world ( AND your preferred most accurate source). All you're doing is deflecting. You made up lies, posted them as fact, made up sources for those lies, and now that you've been completely and inarguably proven wrong (with clear evidence from the source you lied about using) you're trying to deflect attention away from the fact that you're a liar who makes up numbers to support his arguments. And the hilarious part is that now that you've been completely debunked, you think you're in a position to demand explanations. To answer your question (again), I came up with this percentage using YOUR QUOTED SOURCE. You might as well ask Johns Hopkins how they came up with those numbers. They are their numbers, not mine. That's certainly a much better explanation that yours about where you came up with 99.97.