bullets13

Let's get this one back on topic. I'm trying to be patient because I think it's good for the site to have some back and forth, but when it devolves into this sort of thing it defeats the purpose. As I said a while back I'll start issuing warnings if I need to. There's nothing that's overly offensive here, but you guys certainly aren't following site rules with this conversation.

On a thread on another site many of the same folks who are Reagan-level anti-vax were talking about having gotten the monoclonal infusion or being in favor of it. When I pointed out that the infusion has many of the characteristics that they used as arguments against the vaccine (new technology with unknown long term side effects, artificially made in a lab, not FDA approved) they got a little irrational.

Of course it is. I wasn’t telling them they couldn’t. Merely pointing it out. Nobody likes to be shown their own hypocrisy.

Brought this up on another site and a lot of people got upset. But the science itself is extremely close to that used in the vaccine that the same people refuse to take.

Finally stringing a few good weeks together after an awful start

Calvert 48, Chester 28

Lovelady 24 Mount Enterprise 0

Garrison 31 SA 30

Elkhart 29 Trinity 28

Diboll 41 Crockett 0

Coldspring 34 Westwood 13

Anahuac 32 Buna 12

Madisonville 52 Center 40

Kingwood Park 46 Santa Fe 3

TC 35 Dayton 7

Magnolia West 49 Porter 7

Final, according to DC

Carrollton POP 66 Westbury Christian 21

Oakwood 63, Apple Springs 0

Shelbyville 30 Joaquin 36

New Waverly 30 CC 13

Lufkin 27, Cleveland 16

Tenaha 49 Cushing 6

Final score?

North Shore 17 King 0