bullets13

Jason Kidd's 2008 numbers: 11.3 pts, 10.4 assists, 8.1 rebounds. Malik Allens' 2008 numbers: 5.4 pts, 0.6 assists, 2.7 rebounds. Devin Harris' 2008 numbers: 14.4 pts, 5.3 assists, 2.3 rebounds. Jerry Stackhouse's 2008 numbers: 9.8 pts, 2.5 assists, 2.4 rebounds. Hmm... this would almost be a fair trade (if you chose to ignore Harris' enormous upside, as he's only 24). now add in 3 more players, 3 million dollars, 2 first round draft picks. Did i mention that Kidd is shooting a career worst 36.6% from the field?

This would be an awful trade for the mavs... fortunately, devean george just used his no-trade clause, so right now the deals' on hold! Here's the complete trade breakdown (if it goes through): Dallas gets: Kidd, and Malik Allen. For dealing a nobody and an antique point guard, New Jersey would get: Jerry Stackhouse, Devin Harris, Devean George, DeSegana Diop, Maurice Ager, 3 million bucks, and Dallas' first round pick this year, and their first round pick in 2010. Where is the upside in this trade for Dallas? You already have two very solid point guards in Terry and Harris. Why trade away one of those point guards, two VERY important role players in Stackhouse and Diop, a good bench player in George, and drop money and two first round draft picks in order to pick up an aging superstar. They're throwing away several important pieces of Dallas' future for a player that probably doesn't have but maybe 2-3 productive years left, and who is already on his downward swing. I'm befuddled. Hopefully Devean George will stand strong and keep this trade from happening, but i guess if he doesn't, Dallas can always throw Howard or Novitski in as a deal sweetener.

Haha very funny for a guy thats probably overweight and giving such sarcastic citizim but we play hard if yall was on the field yall will have a different point of view but since yall dont all yall be doin is talkin s*** and its gettin to get annoyingso just lay worry about yourself before yall start talkin about people Even if i weighed 500 lbs, i don't see how that would be relevant. Conversation about the fact that ya'll get red cards every game is a legitimate subject on this board, although I'm sure you guys are just being punished for "playing hard" every game. I don't know when playing hard began to be equated with getting ejected. Ya'll need to start worrying about playing the game instead of fighting, talking crap on the field, and making dirty tackles. I played against central 6 or 7 times while i was in high school and i can remember how hard they played, but i never remember anyone getting ejected.

Man, that really surprises me. They usually have a solid team... what's going on at the Brook?

Guys, i didn't make this poll to cause animosity! I honestly feel that both --- and --- are good options, depending on which side of the fence you're on. I actually received a PM from someone who suggested ----, and while i don't agree, his argument held some logic.

This one's an obvious choice. Central will win, 2-1... in red cards. as for goals, lumberton's going to take this one easily, 4-1.

What an unbelievable game. Kentucky's just lucky that Vandy decided to take it easy on them at the defensive end, or thisg ame could've been even uglier.

$$$$$$$$$$ They're running a sweatshop in dallas... you'll be paid 14 cents an hour plus water.

fair enough... kingwood park won't be there long, though, will they?

anyone know WB's record?

If anyone deserves it, Acie does... he played a tremendous part in bringing them into the elite of college basketball.

so basically because bill walton accomplished less than shaq in his career, he's not allowed to point out a blatant truth? it makes sense...

What a huge result for Orangefield! The question remaining is whether they can do it twice in a row.

the future looks bright for EC!

much closer than i expected... was ozen resting players, or did dayton come to play?

ouch... another tough loss for the brook.

Way to go, girls!!

congrats, pirates... this is another big win against the top half of the district.

hey, i finally got one right!

central isn't exactly tearing up the district, but they might be in the running for setting a district record for ejections.

nice start by the pirates!

Thanks for the update.

Behind Kansas I'll agree with you that kansas is overrated. They've certainly got top-5 talent, but they've played a weak schedule, and now that they're getting some tougher opponents in conference, they've had two losses in a pretty short timespan. I still think they are capable of a deep run into the tourney, but that doesn't mean they aren't a bit overrated.

That's laughable, even from someone who is an Aggie fan. Texas is 20-4. One of those losses came to a team currently ranked in the top 10, and two of the remaining three losses came to teams who were in the top ten at one point, and are still at least in the top 20. their only loss to a "bad" team was to 13-11 mizzou, and what team doesn't lose to a bad team once in awhile (i.e. A&M's loss to Tech)? Of their 20 wins, 3 have come against teams currently in the top 6 of the nation, #3 Kansas, #6 UCLA, and a solid thumping of current #4 Tennessee. They also beat St. Mary's by 19 points, who is currently ranked 21st in the coaches poll. So a 20-4 record,3 top-ten wins, another top-25 win, and only one loss to an unranked team, and you say they're overrated. Let's disect A&M's record and ranking. Keep in mind, I have enough sense to know that the aggies are a very good team, and are in fact not overrated, but I'm going to crunch these numbers for you anyway. A&M's record is identical to the longhorns, however, they have: one win against a team currently in the top-25 (and that team is apparently overrated). of their 4 losses, only one is against a team that is currently in the top-25, k-state, and only one team in the top 25 has more losses than k-state. you take two teams who have identical records, but one has beaten better teams, and their losses have also come to better teams. how do you justify the statement that the team who has played the more difficult schedule, and won against better clubs is the overrated team out of the two. Now, I'm not saying that the aggies are overrated. I think they have top 10 talent, and without a little hiccup at the start of conference, there's no doubt that they'd still be in the top 10. i also like their odds of ending the season in the top 10. Just don't let your dislike for the horns blind you to the fact that they're a damn good team, and take more into account than their mascot before deciding you think they're overrated.