jv_coach

No, problem.  Do tell why you find it interesting and telling to qualify which particular Bible I was quoting from?  Why I choose to trust the Bible. [Hidden Content]

Then let us get to the bottom of it. Also Hillary had her own e-mail server. 

This is for  SEblue

The Bible is the only way to open the eyes of a non-believer.    Isaiah 55:10-11Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) 10 For just as rain and snow fall from heaven and do not return there without saturating the earth and making it germinate and sprout, and providing seed to sow and food to eat, 11 so My word that comes from My mouth will not return to Me empty, but it will accomplish what I please and will prosper in what I send it to do.”

The abolitionist ,in England, did the same thing to help end the slave trade within the English empire. Was that wrong of them? 

As far as racism ,everybody can be a racist and a victim of racism, I have seen a lot more non-religious folks being racist then religious folk. And what do you mean by "anti"? The word "anti" is a broad term that can be misleading something councilors do to make sure that their patients keep coming back for more help at a reasonable price of course. And I am glad you are a councilor otherwise I would have thought this post was "anti" rural, Christian and judgmental of people you claim to council.  

I thought this was going to be about Hillary Clinton treachery with her e-mails.

[Hidden Content]   1970s Global Cooling Alarmism     "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." â€“ George Santayana   During the 1970s the media promoted global cooling alarmism with dire threats of a new ice age. Extreme weather events were hyped as signs of the coming apocalypse and man-made pollution was blamed as the cause. Environmental extremists called for everything from outlawing the internal combustion engine to communist style population controls. "Pollution Prospect A Chilling One"  

Stopping the murder of the unborn is not a political trick, abortion is immoral and on par with the evil of slavery. 

"John 3: 3 Jesus answered and said to him, â€œMost assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”

What Do Christians Believe? God's unity - There is only one God God's triune nature - One God in three Persons Christ's virgin birth Human depravity - No one can win God's favor by their own efforts Christ's sinlessness Christ's deity Christ's humanity Necessity of God's grace Necessity of faith Christ's atoning death Christ's bodily resurrection Christ's bodily ascension Christ's intercession Christ's second coming If anybody wants to learn more... [Hidden Content]

BTW- God is going to punish all sin and all man who die in their sin...but God... For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Romans 6:23

[Hidden Content]   1970s Global Cooling Alarmism     "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." â€“ George Santayana   During the 1970s the media promoted global cooling alarmism with dire threats of a new ice age. Extreme weather events were hyped as signs of the coming apocalypse and man-made pollution was blamed as the cause. Environmental extremists called for everything from outlawing the internal combustion engine to communist style population controls. "Pollution Prospect A Chilling One"

[Hidden Content]

What about those in administration whose children can do no wrong? That is when it is really bad!

  So Europe was correct i the 1930's to let Germany annex the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia in order to keep the peace? You know Germany and Russia was on the Germans side back then too.     So allowing a country who believes that their messiahs will only come if they cause mass chaos have nuclear weapons is safe for the region?   So would it have been wise for the civilized world to go after Germany when they entered the Rhineland or was it better we waited and did nothing?

  When Technology Becomes Religion And Science Becomes God by Michael Snyder March 1, 2015 Are we in love with how smart we are?  In America today, there are technology companies that have a much larger “cult following” than any religious organization.  And there are millions upon millions of Americans that freely confess that they “believe in science”.  So what does this say about us?  Does it say that we have discarded ancient “superstitions” and instead have embraced logic and reason?  Sadly, in most cases the truth is that we have simply traded one form of religion for another.  Scientists and technology gurus have become our new high priests, and most of us blindly follow whatever they tell us.  But in the end, just like with so many religious organizations, it is all about the money.  Those with the money determine what the science is going to say, who the high priests are going to be, and what messages are conveyed to the public.  For example, once upon a time the big tobacco companies had armies of doctors and scientists that swore up and down that smoking cigarettes was not harmful.  In fact, many doctors and dentists in America once personally endorsed specific brands of cigarettes.  Of course millions of Americans were getting sick and dying, but this was dismissed as “anecdotal evidence”.  And over in Germany, “science” was once used to prove that the Germans were the master race.  We look back in horror now, but at the time the best “science” in the world was used as justification to promote some horrible untruths.  And of course the same thing is happening today.  We are told over and over that “the science is settled” regarding genetically-modified food, climate change and vaccine safety, and yet those of us that think for ourselves know that isn’t the case at all.  But if you do not believe in the “official story”, you don’t get to be part of the “scientific establishment”.  By definition, the only people that get to be “scientific experts” are the ones that embrace the “doctrine” of those that control the big corporations, that fund the research studies at the major universities and that own the big media outlets.  Everyone else is not permitted to be part of the discussion. As I have written about previously, I spent eight years studying at public universities in the United States.  And over time, I got to see where most “scientific truths” come from these days. Most of the time, the theories that people believe are so “scientific” were simply pulled out of thin air.  In other words, they were just the product of someone’s overactive imagination.  In recent decades, there have been countless examples of “existing science” being overturned and rewritten when more information and evidence become available.  This is because the “existing science” did not have any foundation to begin with. And yet we continue to make the same mistake today.  Instead of calling them “theories”, which is what they should do, scientists all over the world are so eager to make bold pronouncements about the wonderful new “discoveries” that they have made.  These bold pronouncements are then repeated over and over and over again until they become “facts”.  But of course they are not facts at all. For instance, at one time it was a “scientific fact” that it was perfectly safe to smoke cigarettes.  The following comes from a recent article by Tony Cartalucci… It wasn’t long ago when big-tobacco had armies of “scientists” citing the latest “studies” confirming the health benefits and safety of smoking. Of course these were paid liars, not scientists, even if many of them had PhDs. And it was lies they were telling, even if mixed with shades of science. In case you are too young to remember those days, Cartalucci included the following compilation of old tobacco ads in his article… Even worse is how the Nazi used science. To them, the “facts” of Darwinism proved that they were the master race… Hiding behind science is nothing new. Darwinists hid behind it to prop up their racism, which in fact inspired the Nazis to hide behind it to scientifically prove they were the “master race.” The Nazis, in fact, loved science, and used it with horrible precision. At any point in history, has “science” ever had all the answers? Of course not. And without a doubt, someday people will look back and mock all of us for how stupid we were. But we never stop to consider that.  Instead, we are all just so proud of ourselves and our accomplishments. In fact, as I mentioned above, there are a lot of people out there that virtually worship technology these days.  Just consider the following excerpt from a Los Angeles Times article entitled “How Steve Jobs and Apple turned technology into a religion“… Decades after Apple’s founding, we’ve grown used to referring to lovers of the company’s products as a “cult.” The devotion of customers to Apple products has long been the envy of competitors for its fanatical fervor. It turns out that the religious intensity with which people follow the company is not entirely by accident. In a new book, â€œAppletopia,” author Brett Robinson examines the way that Steve Jobs drew on religious metaphors and iconography to elevate his products specifically, and technology more generally, into a kind of religion. “The creative rhetoric around Apple’s technology has favored religious metaphors,” Robinson said in an interview. “Some of it is conscious on Apple’s part. Some of it is unconscious.” But certainly this is less strange than what a lot of religious people do, right? After all, there are millions upon millions of people out there that do some really strange things in the name of religion.  For example, on the other side of the globe 400 men cut off their own testicles in an attempt to get closer to God. Many would say that our worship of science and technology is evidence that we have evolved beyond our ancestors.  In fact, there are some “scientific minds” that are now proclaiming that science will one day eliminate belief in God altogether.  For example, the following comes from an article entitled “Will Science Someday Rule Out the Possibility of God?“… Over the past few centuries, science can be said to have gradually chipped away at the traditional grounds for believing in God. Much of what once seemed mysterious — the existence of humanity, the life-bearing perfection of Earth, the workings of the universe — can now be explained by biology, astronomy, physics and other domains of science. Although cosmic mysteries remain, Sean Carroll, a theoretical cosmologist at the California Institute of Technology, says there’s good reason to think science will ultimately arrive at a complete understanding of the universe that leaves no grounds for God whatsoever. Carroll argues that God’s sphere of influence has shrunk drastically in modern times, as physics and cosmology have expanded in their ability to explain the origin and evolution of the universe. â€œAs we learn more about the universe, there’s less and less need to look outside it for help,” he told Life’s Little Mysteries. Personally, I find this laughable. Darwinists have been trying to move God out of the picture for decades, but they are fighting a losing battle.  Over time, more and more evidence has come out that has shot the theory of evolution full of holes.  For much more on this, please see my previous article entitled “44 Reasons Why Evolution Is Just A Fairy Tale For Adults“. And as far as whether or not God exists, this is something that I have been investigating for many, many years.  My legal training has taught me to think critically and to allow the evidence to speak for itself.  Over time, I came to learn that there is a vast mountain of evidence that leads to one inescapable conclusion.  In the end, the overwhelming conclusion that I reached was that God is very, very real.  You can find a few of my thoughts in an article entitled “Did You Know?” So what do you think? Does our society worship technology? Has “science” become a god in America? Please feel free to add to the discussion by posting a comment below…  

  But your denominational views post date the COTUS?  

The boy was eating skittles and the klan lynched him for it!  You are such a racist!!!           lol good post :)

Jesus said I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man comes to the Father but through Me. John 14:6   I would disagree with the pastor in the this way. God has let it be known how He judges and by what standard He judges. He has also let it be known that we do not meet those requirements. Knowing that we can not meet His standards on our best day God made a "WAY" not many paths but one path. God did not have to make any paths because God does not need any of us. So praise God that He made one way and made it accessible to all who would believe (John 3:16).  God also let us know that He can be trusted because He can not lie, thus God is "TRUTH". With all that being the question about little jonny or homosexuals is not above a pastors pay grade to say the least.   And since God has judged something wrong then it is not being judgmental to say something is wrong.   As far as the verse you are using here it is in its full context. It is hypocritical judgment that Jesus is talking about by the way.  Do Not Judge 37 â€œJudge not, and you shall not be judged. Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. 38 Give, and it will be given to you: good measure, pressed down, shaken together, and running over will be put into your bosom. For with the same measure that you use, it will be measured back to you.” 39 And He spoke a parable to them: â€œCan the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into the ditch? 40 A disciple is not above his teacher, but everyone who is perfectly trained will be like his teacher. 41 And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not perceive the plank in your own eye? 42 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me remove the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the plank that is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck that is in your brother’s eye.

 An atheist killed somebody!!!  

Global Warming is real? Could be.       Is Global Warming man made and can we only be saved by giving more power to the government? No. 

It seems to me that most of the anti-vaccine folks I met are more libertarian .... Of course when it comes to the HPV vaccine, I am against that one being forced upon the population. Rick Perry is an idiot

[Hidden Content]