TxHoops

Apparently he received some “confirmation” that Herman was speaking to Brett McMurphy. What set him off initially is that apparently Herman’s wife (and thus Tom) gave Mrs. Smith money to help her with her divorce expenses.

I will say that Texas is an “at will” employment state so anyone “could” be fired for this. The only thing that’s an impermissible firing is one that violates a protected class. Adulterers are not one of those. I merely state that when I have seen an affair become an issue, it’s been between coworkers. I don’t recall any getting fired though. I too have seen pastors fired for getting caught with their proverbial pants down. Obviously it becomes more relevant to the job in those instances.

I forgot I need the “men of the cloth” exception for some who have discernment issues. I might also add here that if the affair is with a farm animal, it might also then be a fireable offense, as well as a criminal offense in this state. If I can think of anything else to make my stroke less broad, I will let you guys know.

Assuming it’s not with a coworker, I don’t know that I’ve ever seen one, save with a member of the clergy. And I’ve seen plenty among coworkers where only a reprimand was issued. And i assume you are inquiring about the second part of the highlighted portion. It’s obviously not illegal if both parties meet the age of consent. Although it is illegal in other countries. And heck, it might still be on the books of some backwoods state, like an sec state or West Virginia.

It’s either that or he’s mentally retarded. I am giving him the benefit of the doubt by assuming the former. As for proof, it’s funny you mention that since it’s a concept you struggle with. For instance, a guy beats his wife, pictures are released, texts of him admitting it are released, but you get confused and say there is no proof he’s a wife beater because you fall in a rabbit hole because of one particular night when he violated a no contact order BUT didn’t beat her THAT night. In the end, you have a complete scumbag who is bitter and trying to equate adultery (if true) with domestic violence. 99 percent of those on twitter see it for what it is. 1 percent are aroused and show themselves to be, although not equally pathetic, pathetic nonetheless. And by pathetic, I include dumb in this particular definition of the word. And here’s something else that might shock you: Although I do not condone extramarital affairs, they aren’t illegal nor are they fireaable offenses. I think you might be as shocked by the number of coaches who have had similar transgressions, as well as their identities.

The one lasting thing to come out of a poor, pathetic excuse of man’s alcohol/drug-induced tirage (other than giving a few gomers semis). That little phrase is going to sell 100k shirts and be a hashtag for years and years to come. So thanks for that Zach! We’d have never known if you weren’t so self-aware you don’t mind posting when you are owned (or more likely don’t know you were). And thanks to TH. That was fonzie-level stuff.

You unintentionally almost solved this apparently complicated riddle in the first paragraph. NOW go back and reread the first post of mine that you quoted. THEN reread your first paragraph here. I THINK you can solve it from there.

(Flagged for most accurate post of the day.)

Rational aggy response: [Hidden Content] Irrational, still obsessed, mentally-challenged aggy response: see In This Thread (but they’ve moved on folks )

Yes. Yes you did. And with each passing post, I am seeing more and more Blinn. And I see you weren’t “playing” dumb. Soooo, let me spell it out for you. There are small children involved. Mom has consistently claimed Dad is unstable. Dad has Twitter. As for Tom suing Zach, that’s a super dumb idea (even if it’s all made up) for a multitude of reasons, all of which would obviously take an eternity to explain to some.

Sweet Jesus. You really can’t be as slow as you play on the internet. I know aggy has gone open enrollment now but there were “some” standards when you went there. I would spell it out for you...

I have been told by more than one Ag that it isn’t adultery if it’s with a chicken sir...

That memorandum they signed in exchange for an order that won’t let him go near her (without being immediately arrested) dealt with violating a previous no contact order (which doesn’t have the teeth of a protective order). What they signed was no violence occurred that particular night of the violation. I don’t think there’s much doubt the dude’s a wife beater. But he does do a decent job of proclaiming innocence and getting “some” to buy into it. If he’s confirmed anything tonight, it’s that he’s an unstable, delusional nut job. That being said, I have no idea whether his ex is crazy or not. Sometimes birds of a feather and all.

Good news: due to having a protective order issued against him, it is illegal for Zach Smith to possess a firearm for at least 3 years. Bad news: I don’t think Zach Smith concerns himself with laws.

2 things that I can assure you are happening: 1) his ex-wife’s lawyer is getting carpal tunnel’s from all the screen shots he’s been taking; and 2) his own lawyer has been sent to voice mail numerous times.

I wonder if he will fail to make the Jerry Springer interview circuit due to overdose/nick-cage-leaving-las-vegas-drink-himself-to-death before he logs off twitter tonight. Someone should call in a welfare check STAT.

This lunatic made Amabelle famous. See, some good can come out of anything; even a drug-induced tirade: [Hidden Content]

Why is no one remotely concerned about giving this nut job the attention he’s obviously craving? (Not to mention there’s zero chance he isn’t covered in white powder today.). And why is no one calling this dbag out about bragging about seeing another man receive a handy?

I agree with you. Barrett is something else. But Zion is going to be as marketable as anyone we’ve seen I think.

Beat me to it. Liev Schreiber’s monologue was great too. Some of you need to stop impersonating snowflakes [Hidden Content]

I didn’t see the fall ball game but from those that did that were there yesterday, I think it’s basically the same group. Which would make sense because I don’t think Concordia has many (certainly not as many as Silsbee) football players. I know Hellums little brother plays but he’s a freshman and not sure if he’s going to be on the varsity basketball team or not.

I was referring to myself as well. I start as many conversations about the Tigers as anyone. I have greatly enjoyed watching them over the past several years and have especially enjoyed watching the journey of these seniors. When I said everyone, I was definitely including myself. In fact, I could probably find a recent thread where I was chastised for starting a conversation about silsbee within it. It was my bad. The more I think about it, I may be as guilty of this as any poster on this site not named Badsanta or Kountzer. They’re worse about it than me

I agree. I would have liked to have seen the Tigers get to play them during the season. Would have been a great way to get experience for what they may see down the road. Concordia is like a better, more talented version of an Argyle.

I do love these early matchups though. Take Silsbee (everybody’s favorite topic) vs South Garland. I can’t wait to see it and hope Silsbee takes it to them. But the tigers should go in with a nothing to lose, give them our best punch to the mouth attitude. If SG runs them out of the gym, no one will be surprised (outside of Hardin County). But if Silsbee can even play with them toe to toe, some folks will be sitting up pretty straight in their chairs.

C’mon AAW. Not sure if you’re trolling here but you’re at the front of the pack with the “scrimmages are not games” argument. And I agree with you in that sentiment. They’re good for seeing what certain players can do, but not the best indicator for what would happen in a regular season game. Good indicator was when Silsbee got beaten by a Westbury Christian team in fall ball, which was a game some of the Tigers BADLY wanted to win. They didn’t. But I still would have bet on Silsbee to win against the same team had they played during the season. Why does silsbee think it’s a slight when people think someone might give them a game? They are the best team in 4A. You don’t have to better than Duke.