TxHoops

When the 3 ball is falling they can be very good. I think that’s what Soulja is talking about when he says PAM will lose a game in district. On paper, they are double digit favorites over everyone. But catch Central or Ozen on a hot night and the Titans off a little, they can be beaten. Personally won’t be shocked either way.

OF 50 Tarkington 31 F Dischler 15p,4r Catt 8p,5r,5a,3b Lathrop 12p,4r Waggoner 10r

OF 40 Tarkington 22 End 3

OF 37 Tarkington 16 H

OF 16 Tarkington 4 End 1

Agreed. I may disagree with Eng on some issues, such as this one, but he doesn’t deserve that!

Stop bringing logic into this discussion!

Sport, I have already offered to put my money where my mouth is when it comes to proving which classroom we belong. Specifically, in a quantifiable exam measuring solely one’s logical and analytical reasoning (of which you seem to be pretty self-impressed). But I understand - you want no part of that. After all, one can’t bluster or name call one’s way through such a test. And you would have ZERO chance of winning such test anyway. You could conceivably tie - but I would put another obscene side bet against that as well. Carry on to the fifth grade now lol

It is not solely man’s cause, nor is that the claim. But exacerbation, that’s another issue entirely...

Wait - my bad. I forgot Engy has his own scientific troup - tin foil hats and all!

Reading comprehension - NOT your friend lol

This concern is as laughable as you general premise on the subject. In point of fact, despite your kind’s best efforts, the exact opposite has been the general effect.

That is an idiom for the most intelligent people.

Yes

Once again, you post a wordy dissertation that amounts to no more than “nuh uh.” The fact that you quote “facts” that there are no facts is what leads me to believe you have merely been spoon fed the hypothesis that you regurgitate over and over. I HIGHLY doubt you have read more than I have on this subject. But the bet to which you allude is useless, since it is unquantifiable (unlike a previous bet I proposed). But here is one study that has been endorsed by virtually every scientific organization in the world (if we are talking actual science - not the junk deny, deny, deny by those whose agenda it does not fit and who shovel it in the gullets of those hangers on who may die in ignorance. The answer to some of the questions you ask are located therein: [Hidden Content]

I have seen very, very little of that show other than a few clips. I have heard much more of Limbaugh than those ladies. But from I can gather, they target a similar audience, albeit from different sides of the aisle so to speak.

I recommended you click on each link. It is obvious to me you need to read each one to help you gain a better understanding of the topic (which you consistently display, to those who actually do have a grasp of it, a severe lack of any such understanding). I am being sincere when I say “all of them.” I am not here to teach a science class. But I am happy to provide the data for one to educate themselves, if they are so capable. And I think you didn’t read them because you didn’t. If you’re honest, you would admit that.

I would highly recommend it. It is obvious who his target audience is. Let’s just say it’s not the sharpest knives in the drawer. If he were honest, even Rush would admit this.

So you haven’t read any of it. Thanks for confirming the obvious. I would suggest clicking on all of them and reading. Let me know if you need me to help explain any of the data or concepts to you.

You can click on those little link thingys in the post you shared and read all kinds of scientific data and analyses. It is not my fault that you either (a) have not done so, or (b) did not understand what you were reading. After all, it is much easier to simply regurgitate what you hear on the Dr. Limbaugh show...

Yes, yes that’s a proper analogy. The litany of scientific organizations who have endorsed the IPCC report be darned! Dr. Engy has once again proclaimed “NUH UH!” Thus, it must not be so...

Shocking!

If my understanding of science is contrary to this board, well, that is a compliment of the highest order. Thank you good sir! Only in this place, so devoid of logic and, apparently, independent thinking and discernment, could scientists be called science deniers. But once again, that was an excellent recitation of “nuh uh.” The flat-earners would be proud!

It can be found and read (I would say again but that is doubtful). Not going to post a treatise every time someone posts “nuh uh.” To say the least. It is accurate as to to Hansen’s report to the congressional committee. Other than that, I’m not sure the author purported to state any facts. It was just the standard denier’s rhetoric.