TxHoops

Never easy AAW. TD Ags!

This “you did so I did it” excuse I expect from 3rd graders. Once you old enough to drive, that doesn’t fly with me anymore.

That was one of worst abuses by Congress I’ve ever seen. Garland was a good nominee and the Clown show in DC refused to even hold a vote.

Not too quick. Need to score here and let Auburn get a first down or two without scoring.

Need the old BDC for AAW. Those are the best.

Vance Bedford must be the tackling coach at A&M now.

Did that look uncatchable to anyone else?

That dude Ratley can fly by the way.

Need that first half defense back.

Not so fast my friend!

Crowd got into it after that piece of homecoming.

Win tonight and that will go a long way. Most, if not all of those teams will lose/lose again.

That’s as rare as a pretty aggy cheerleader. I found out why they go with the milkmen during the Harvey basketball game. That was a pretty fugly college dance team. Reminded me of the Revenge of the Nerds: UT’s girls were the Pi Delta Pi’s, aggy’s were the Omega Mu’s...

Lots of empty seats. Tudor Fieldhouse was louder last week.

13-12 was the final

OF 13 HJ 12 4:35 4th Kicking counts. HJ 0-2 on PATs. Rainey for OF with a PAT and 2 FGs.

OF 13 HJ 6 11:07 4th

I will be the first to admit (and you KNOW I love me some WJC) that Clinton left that proverbial turd in the White House punch bowl. And poor W got blamed (by SOME) for the stench. I need help - I’m starting to sound like Reb. (Edit - obviously I’m not the first to admit it - figure of speech. I’ve seen other people most on this board would deem lefty freely admit the same thing.)

That’s more like it! Tiger fans need a blowout week to calm the nerves. 92 is right - Jekyll and Hyde (or roller coaster).

This Silsbee team needs a killer instinct. Gotta keep your foot on their throat when you have them down!

Nash, did I strike a nerve with “Pubbies?” After all the cute names this board likes to call the Dems, I thought it appropriate. I debated “Pubes” but thought the former to be more tasteful. You know I defer to you on economic issues, but I will say a couple of things that I believe (and have also seen you write - I think - in the past). One, Clinton was, by most accounts, one of the most deep and forward-thinking, astute Presidents we’ve had in terms of economic policy. BUT (and here’s my reference to you) he played a large part in the housing policies that ended a colossal failure. And two, I have actually read a lot on this issue (and if I recall, have heard you state this as well), and most of the so-called experts will say that Presidents (and certainly Congress) get way too much credit for robust economies and way too much blame for the opposite. I apologize if I’ve misremembered anything but I’m convinced REBgp has infected me with his contagious senility.

The real genius of both men is they were able to reach across the aisle and work with the other party btw. Something at which their successors have failed miserably. The current has enough problems working with his own party.

No offense, but I will take republican appointee Greenspan’s assessment over the rhetoric of this board. And besides, I have given Reagan credit on here often, even though he had a Democratic Congress during his administration. Somehow, Pubbies have a hard time doing the same.

[Hidden Content] Greenspan said Clinton and former President Nixon were "by far the smartest presidents I've worked with." Greenspan writes, "I played no role in finding the answer, but I had to admire the one Clinton and his policymakers came up with." Greenspan reserves his highest praise for Bill Clinton, whom he described in his book as a sponge for economic data who maintained "a consistent, disciplined focus on long-term economic growth."

Assuming they don’t extend Sumblin again.