TxHoops

Some are mentally something

I still believe Kirk Ferentz at Iowa is one of the most underrated coaches in the country. And Pat Fitzgerald at Northwestern is fantastic too. I also think Cutcliffe at Duke is one of the best coaches in the ACC.

Hard to "run this state" when you get the same amount of votes as Kentucky...

I predict I will be sober with the 11 am start. I predict that sobriety will be short- lived if we lose.

No pass, no play...

Silsbee will be more than happy if they are the best 4A team in the state again...

La Lum, Mont Verd, IMG, etc would be way too much for Cy Falls, much less Silsbee. But if Hicks were to be able to set something up, it would be with Cy Falls.

Big 10 if we're doing those 3 on 3. But ACC is right close

This would not be an institutional issue because he doesn't even know who is giving him the small amounts of cash. In fact, he clearly states in the interview that the boosters connected with the program would never give him money...

I would invite anyone who is offended by $100 handshakes to swing by an LSU practice parking lot and see how many cars are from the same dealership. I can even give you the name in advance. And the name of the guy who runs said dealership, who of course has no direct ties to the university. Other than he's in a suite every home game.

Why bring Trump into this?

I don't know if either Queen Gertrude or I meet such qualifications. I guess for me it's a matter of nuance. I think when the posting becomes so repetitious it borders on obsessive, it at least appears to have struck a chord, cut too deep, etc. I suppose only the individual and his God knows too much. As for your second question, I am unaware of a "protest police" but would be happy to apply for membership.

You mean like this? "I am quite certain YOU did. I'm not sure he did when he exclaimed that I attempted to "brand the Republican Party" on the basis of one idiot. I clearly said something to the contrary earlier and was equally clearly making a point about who those idiots support, not the Party supporting the idiots. A simple reading of the posts leading up to the video would reveal this. And obviously both parties have plenty of idiots to go around..."

Have always loved that song and that is a beautiful rendition. And I'm with you pal. And I believe the following except of a speech we've all heard contains "words to live by."

This is almost getting to a point of "me thinks thou doth protest too much." The subjects of enlightenment and racism, when broached, seem to become an obsession with you...

A bet requires two parties. Otherwise it is not a bet but a proposition. Further free enlightenment.

No one would take that bet so I guess it was.

They do and he should

Goodrich 144 Chester 6 Ouch

And [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content] my bet was safe. As most of them are...

Very good. And arguably one of the best guards, certainly offensively. Meanwhile, your Jags' Williams has moved back to Cleveland...

I really thought you were messing with me. I will give you the benefit of the doubt since I had an autocorrect of "most" to "almost" and an "and" was "an" in the explanation I gave that you said wasn't needed. Here it is again: "BUT to spell it out for you, someone asked if I thought more racists were republican. I said certainly most republicans weren't (in direct contradiction of one of your premises of MY point). Then I said that I would bet that most of the idiots who marched on Charlottesville WERE Trump supporters. After which I posted a video of Duke (their keynote speaker to be at the event) saying THEY believed they were carrying out Trump's campaign promises or something to that effect. So your diatribe of how I was branding an entire party, along with some examples to the contrary that were a little less recent than last week (to say the least) was off point, off issue and otherwise irrelevant to the discussion. Maybe that will save you some time..."

Don't make me come find you LRF!

I am quite certain YOU did. I'm not sure he did when he exclaimed that I attempted to "brand the Republican Party" on the basis of one idiot. I clearly said something to the contrary earlier and was equally clearly making a point about who those idiots support, not the Party supporting the idiots. A simple reading of the posts leading up to the video would reveal this. And obviously both parties have plenty of idiots to go around...