TxHoops

They could easily win that district. I would favor Kountze as usual but wouldn't be a bit surprised if Buna did win it.

Frankston 30 Hemphill 20 F

GPNS 38 Kingwood 21 F

CP 38 Conroe 35 F

Crockett 60 CC 32 F

PC 28 Alto 7 F

Hitchcock 44 Hempstead 12 F

Diboll 34 Huntington 0 F

Iola 55 SP 14 F

Newton 43 Garrison 6 F

Shepherd 54 Madisonville 21 F

HH 33 Cleveland 14 F

Centerville 55 WS 29 F

Atascocita 26 summer creek 10 F

Absolutely. Was hoping to see my boy JJ but the NCAA screwed that up.

Heading to Austin tonight for game tomorrow. Hoping to catch the basketball practice in the AM.

1. PAM 2. Woodville 3. Union Hill 4. Lufkin 5. Atascocita 6. Crosby 7. BH 8. Vidor 9. Central 10. BC 11. Huffman 12. Diboll 13. Tarkington 14. WOS 15. Kirbyville 16. WC 17. Hitchcock 18. Crockett 19. Newton 20. Alto 21. Centerville 22. Iola 23. OCC 24. Nederland 25. Shepherd

I wish he wouldn't put Yates in that late game every year. I'm usually too dang tired and ready to go home by then.

I will split the difference between Santa and Soulja. Tigers by 14. But the 300+ rushing yards streak ends for Tyler. He only goes for 200+ in this one.

I think they were wise to let Osweiler go (value compared to how much it took to sign him) and their defense is still one of the best in the NFL. I wouldn't read too much into a loss to a hot Falcons team. Wait, wrong board. My apologies....

Having said all that, this is pretty interesting:

I agree all the way around. For one thing, and amazingly I must say, Dak doesn't appear to try and do too much. Sometimes that's the bite with Romo (and I love Romo). But as I think baddog pointed out, Dak is now 8 completions shy of breaking Brady's record of completions without Sam INT to begin a career. Momentum is a powerful thing and I don't think you mess with it as long as the team is playing well. But as we agree on, Garrett will play Romo when he's healthy. And I hope that's the correct move and I'm as wrong as can be.

Well, and of course thank them for their votes!

You're probably right. By the way, in the last 24 hours, Clinton's betting odds rose from -260 to -330. After the debate tonight, they are at -500. But I'm sure you're right.

While I think that's a relatively simplified approach, we would disagree on who that is anyway.