-
Posts
16,436 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
45
Everything posted by TxHoops
-
One letter for you: W. [Hidden Content] Obviously the debt has continued to escalate under Obama. I place plenty of blame on him for failing to correct a lot of the damage done by the previous administration as he promised. But let's be clear. The downward spiral was already in full effect when he was sworn in.
-
Me thinks some of you are unaware a hypocrisy is a two way street. Which makes most of these "retorts" pretty funny. That's the whole point fellas. Glass houses...glass houses.
-
Bam
-
-
Funny, the overwhelming majority of the pejorative terms on this board pertaining to one's intelligence come from righties and are directed toward the left... i think you comment may reveal your own belief or knowledge that the majority of the scholarly are to the left...and congrats, you would be correct.
-
I would think that was a weight joke except you included Nash!
-
Valid point. I always respected the man for his intelligence. Now I respect him for his...well, you know...as well.
-
Goodwin was actually a first rounder and thus had a guaranteed contract. Cal has given a lot worse advice (often intentionally) to more players than Archie.
-
So you agree Hillary is a big favorite to win the election?
-
You are not in your 90s Nash. But no, not fair. But neither would a golf match between us, I can assure you!
-
He told me he met you earlier. Really good guy. I don't really follow the bookies closely. I had to look up the presidential odds but had read she was heavily favored a month ago. I was actually surprised to see it has risen despite recent events. As for the NBA odds, I seem to spend my summers around gyms and was told that last week by someone I would not doubt. As for the golf bet, no thank you. I am too proud to accept the amount of strokes required to make that bet fair!
-
I thought your link indicated Trump was actually a favorite now? Unless the implication is that "swing states" aren't actually swing states by the definition because Hillary doesn't need them to win. And no, you would have to lay a lot more than -325 on GS making the playoffs. They are less than even money to WIN the NBA championship next year... (-130 l think was the last number I saw)
-
interesting. I also missed he announced Palin would be in his cabinet. I can only hope he is talking about an actual cabinet in the White House. Or maybe Minister of Presidential Wardrobe and Hair Products. I could roll with that.
-
And actually, you can win $2600 on a $1000 bet online now. Have to lay $3250 to win $1000 on Hillary.
-
No, you already established Vegas is often wrong (and I won't deny that). Based upon your link posted, I would be willing to bet straight up but not require you to give me odds (even though trump leads in all the swing states).
-
My money is fresh for the taking then!
-
He's a lock
-
But don't feel bad...22 goes into my age more than once as well...
-
22 x ?
-
Hasn't seemed to be a hindrance to Google, Apple, etc...amazingly the more money they make, the more they stay put in a state with higher tax rates.
-
Correct. He's a democrat because he's one of the most intelligent men in the world
-
I understand he's more of a burnt orange and white kind of kid. Don't be surprised to see 2 Silsbee kids playing for Shaka out of that class.
-
Honestly it would depend on much more than tax rates. And he would not pay a high tax rate under my theory but would pay a higher one the more successful he was. But how would being a republican make you more successful than me? Of course that alone does not determine someone's success. At least not monetarily. How the government operates does have a bearing as we both would acknowledge
-
He hasn't had a lot of looks yet because those mostly come from summer games. But most know of him already. All that will come. I also hear he will be cleared soon. Before it's said and done, he will have a ton of offers. And the way he has apparently grown, good grief.
-
No, I am saying it sure is ironic if you all are as correct as you think you are. But are you actually saying you believe there is no government influence on the stock market? Surely that was a typo or misstatement. I KNOW you aren't that naive.