Big girl

Weapons were there, but not of mass destruction. Mustard gas is not a weapon of mass detruction. Ut is my understanding that we knew he had chemicals because he used them on his people.

My husband accidentally pricked himself with a butterfly needle after drawing blood from a patient with HIV. I pricked myself twice on two separate occasions. Thankfully, we didnt contract the virus.

I know this because I am a Registered Nurse.

I know, this is not a pandemic in the US. We knew healthcare workers were more at risk, sometimes nurses and doctors can be a little laxed with using universal precautions when they think a person does not have a deadly disease. The guy lied and said he was not exposed to someone with the virus

In an article entitled WMD: A Primer by Eric Margolis three types of unconventional arms are called WMD: nuclear, chemical and biological. Of those, the only true weapons of mass destruction are nuclear. The U.S., Russia, China, France, Britain, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea, alone possess them. Japan could make nuclear weapons within 90 days. Without specialized medium and long-range delivery systems (aircraft or missiles), nuclear weapons are useless, even suicidal.

I feel bad for kenny. He is only a freshman, the media hyped him up by giving him that stupid thrill name too early and now they are tearing him down. He has several years to improve.

dont waste your time. You cant reason with them.

Great!!! I was against sending troops. I was not against air strikes. ;)

I am not stupid enough to go to Iraq; therefore, I dont have to worry about that. :)

Our mission in Iraq the first time worked great. Yeah right. Why should we send more.

would you be willing to go to Iraq? If so , there is a special number you can call to volunteer. *Mod Edit - no profanity *

what freedoms will we gain or retain if troops are sent to Iraq? I want to know in detail, because I am so dumb. I totally get that I wouldn't have the freedoms I have if we did not have conventional wars. I totally get the World Wars etc.

Tt

Tt

that is b.s.and you know it. You would send your son or daughter to potentially be slaughtered so that you stop a beheading that might occur?

Cant special ops be sent to take out their leaders? They took out Bin Laden and there were not any American casualties.

tt

sooo.you dont have a legitimate reason so you resort to insults. Smh. You are saying that we should send troops to die so that they can stop a terror attack that MIGHT happen?

I agree

how many people do they have? Do they have enough to start a conventional war with the USA?

name the freedoms. My power of reasoning is not that good.How will our troops stop a terrorist attack if they go to Iraq?.

A@M 's enrollment(College Station) was 56,255 students in.2013.

I graduated from A@M and those fans are fanatical. I never bought into it so I was a two percenter. They have midnight yell practice and the students stand up the entire game which I thought was ridiculous.Their alumni base is strong as well. People drive from different cities so that they can attend games. A another factor is this: A&M has over 40000 students, Lamar does not.

I read that ISIS has about 3000 members, are you saying that they will try to invade a Super Power? (If those numbers are correct )

what freedoms would you and I obtain if troops are placed in Iraq?