Big girl

you said that per texas law a district attorney that has a dui charge should be removed from.office. They were not.( the other DA'S ) Your explanation does not make sense.

What about the 2 other DA's, per Texas law they should've been asked to leave, but they weren't.

read the thread again. You will see the link.

1. Rick Perry helps to create the Cancer Research Agency 2. Perry and Abbott use this as a piggy bank for their donors. 3. Public Integrity Unit led by DA investigates the agency after Perry/Abbott donor gets sketchy 1 million USD. 4. During the investigation, Perry threatened to veto unit funding if the DA doesn't resign THis is what I read.

I read that he told the district attorney to resign or he would veto funding to the agency. That is a threat.

soooo you guys dont think it is odd that he went after the district attorney and the agency that was investigating he and Abbot"s agency.

So.....it is okay to threaten a public official. I read that two other DA's were issued DWI citations and Perry didn't do anything about it. I don't know how true the story is, but l will post the link.

co·er·cion kōˈərZHən,-SHən/Submit noun the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats.

He should have removed her from office. What is up with the threats? That wasn't even necessary.

Perry is an idiot.

What would you call it? I am asking just to gain some knowledge in regards to the situation.

It is reported that Perry threatened the DA, by telling her that he would veto the funding if she didn't resign. Is that ok?

president Obama has never been indicted to my knowledge. It doesn't matter what I think or feel. My opinion on the Perry issue is irrelevant, the jurors opinions are of the utmost importance.

it is. That's not the issue. He vetoed it, because the DA he was trying to force to resign wouldn't. Isn't that coercion?

do you think this is a phony scandal while feeling that the various complaints about Obama are true?

1. Rick Perry helps to create the Cancer Research Agency 2. Perry and Abbott use this as a piggy bank for their donors. 3. Public Integrity Unit led by DA investigates the agency after Perry/Abbott donor gets sketchy 1 million USD. 4. During the investigation, Perry threatened to veto unit funding if the DA doesn't resign.

Why were they investigating Perry? You have to follow the money.

I changed my mind. (:

how was he sabotaged?

roflmbo

Isn't that coercion?

You can't try to force someone to resign and then cut funding to the political integrity unit (after threatning to do so if one does not comply)because they don't. He is stupid for saying that out loud.

Tt

I did in an earlier post in this thread.

no, there is another one. I said I am not sure if it is authentic. He didn't shove the clerk in this particular video. I have seen both