Big girl

true, because the republican party has a bunch of obstructionists. They are impossible to work with. That is why they are called the party of no

I did, hell it is the truth.

Tx hoops is the smartest petson on this forum. You CANNOT win a debate against him so why try.

sigh, the economy again, next Benghazi, entitlements. You recycle complaints. It the same ole things with you.

Steve, why didnt you volunteer to help Bush? In 2003 he said "mission accomplished". It took us 9 more years to get out of there. (Iraq), 11yrs later they find (supposedly)find wmd if that's the case our Cia sucks. Oh, I forgot, they were hidden in Syria.

Why do they invest in birth control companies if they are adamametally opposed to paying for them. Some women cannot afford them.

If sadaam had them, he wouldve used them. Why would he risk being executed? Steve, are you saying that mustard gas is not a wmd?

People are saying that they hid them in Syria (stupid) that is why they couldnt be found. I am not buying it.

Why didnt iraq use the weapons of mass destruction when the US invaded; insteAd of, hiding them in Syria? Do you think we could get away with invading Russia or would they hide their wmd in Cambodia and let us take over their country. That would be stupid.

Sue me boener. "I am a constitutional lawyer and I know you cant win". I love this man

Yet hobby lobby , according to what I read , invests in birth control companies. Hypocricy at its best

Do dome research on who was polled.

Lol

kmsl

kmsl

kmsl

what is your definition of copyright infringement and plagiarism?

roflmbo

you definitely implied it. You guys are some hateful christians

The story is from the link above, even fox news says wmd were not found. Isnt that something?

R-Texas) insist that Saddam Hussein “had weapons of mass destruction,” and may have moved the stockpiles “over into Syria.” I immediately double-checked the date, and sure enough, the comments came yesterday. To clarify, those making remarks like these in August 2003 were foolish. For anyone, least of all an elected member of Congress, to repeat such things out loud in August 2013 suggests Louie Gohmert may, in fact, be made of wood. Alas, he’s not alone. Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) said on Thursday that he is against military intervention in Syria, even though his “gut feeling” is that the Syrian government now possesses chemical weapons that came from fallen Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Terry, who has served in the House since 1999, supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. In an interview on Thursday with Omaha radio host Tom Becka, Terry said Syria was a completely different situation. “The theory then and the evidence was that Iraq was an enemy of the United States and had direct plans in either support of al Qaeda and/or with other weapons that we found out weren’t there – which I still think they were moved to Syria,” said Terry. “And it wouldn’t surprise me if some of the chemical weapons that have been used by Syria actually came from Iraq.” The Nebraska Republican added, “[W]e all we know that Iraq had … chemical and biological weapons and then they weren’t there.” You’ve got to be kidding me. It’s painful to realize that there are still members of Congress who are confused about the basics, even now, a decade later. But in case Reps. Terry and Gohmert see this, let’s spell it out: Iraq’s WMD stockpiles didn’t exist. There’s no reason to believe the weapons were moved to Syria since, once again, they didn’t exist. Explore: ell even fox news is saying there were not any wmd. The story from the link above.

Those who still get the Iraq WMD story wrong | MSNBC www.msnbc.com/.../those-who-still-get-t...

Do they have nuclear weapons?

You sound insane, are you really comparing obama to hitler?

And you guys constantly complain about it. Entitlements, remember.