Big girl

The story is from the link above, even fox news says wmd were not found. Isnt that something?

R-Texas) insist that Saddam Hussein “had weapons of mass destruction,” and may have moved the stockpiles “over into Syria.” I immediately double-checked the date, and sure enough, the comments came yesterday. To clarify, those making remarks like these in August 2003 were foolish. For anyone, least of all an elected member of Congress, to repeat such things out loud in August 2013 suggests Louie Gohmert may, in fact, be made of wood. Alas, he’s not alone. Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) said on Thursday that he is against military intervention in Syria, even though his “gut feeling” is that the Syrian government now possesses chemical weapons that came from fallen Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Terry, who has served in the House since 1999, supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. In an interview on Thursday with Omaha radio host Tom Becka, Terry said Syria was a completely different situation. “The theory then and the evidence was that Iraq was an enemy of the United States and had direct plans in either support of al Qaeda and/or with other weapons that we found out weren’t there – which I still think they were moved to Syria,” said Terry. “And it wouldn’t surprise me if some of the chemical weapons that have been used by Syria actually came from Iraq.” The Nebraska Republican added, “[W]e all we know that Iraq had … chemical and biological weapons and then they weren’t there.” You’ve got to be kidding me. It’s painful to realize that there are still members of Congress who are confused about the basics, even now, a decade later. But in case Reps. Terry and Gohmert see this, let’s spell it out: Iraq’s WMD stockpiles didn’t exist. There’s no reason to believe the weapons were moved to Syria since, once again, they didn’t exist. Explore: ell even fox news is saying there were not any wmd. The story from the link above.

Those who still get the Iraq WMD story wrong | MSNBC www.msnbc.com/.../those-who-still-get-t...

Do they have nuclear weapons?

You sound insane, are you really comparing obama to hitler?

And you guys constantly complain about it. Entitlements, remember.

I agree wholeheartedly. A lot of countries have mustard gas.

Supply side economics will never work. It didnt work under Reagan either.

Some hosts anyway

Yeah whatever. Why Is even fox news denying the claims of wmd being found in iraq

Already has.

I know that the average family that shops on the exchange already have. My friend's family went from paying 1200/mo to 650 mo.

And even they admit (fox news), which is a miracle in itself.

It took them 12 yrs to find those weapons? You guys are die hard fox news fans and they admit wmd were not found. Explain that please.

The free phone program started with bush1, did you know that?

Steve nash, the GOP ( along with you) wants to make drastic cuts in those programs. The WIC program allows infants to be fed. Why would anyone want to make cuts to that programs. I understand why people from Cuba and Mexico want to come here.

I answered your question. Reread the post.

We went from being the primary lender to being the primary borrower while Reagan was president.

It is hard for him to get anything done, because he has to fight with the party of no.

How Did you feel when Reagan raised taxes 11 times?

How Did you feel when Reagan raised taxes 11 times?

I told you. Any country that doesnt not do what I mentioned

A place where there is not a total disregard for the poor, needy and children, a place that is not going to war for oil.

Where are they coming from. If they are coming from another industrialized country then I am baffled.

Some people consider weapons of madd destruction as weapons that that can destroy buildings/topple mountains.Look it up.