oldschool2

I have no affiliation to PNG or any other school in the SeTx coverage area.

Fine.. just make every single transfer sit a year for varsity competition. Regardless of the reason. That should show who's actually changing schools for academic reasons.

Several schools did about how one would expect. Silsbee's run was surprising after finding out how many was lost from the year before. I was probably the most surprised by Hardin. I would've lost money on just about everything related to their season. One win away from T2. Playoffs in general. Performance vs. Westwood. All completely unexpected. Similar sentiment.. I was surprised that Anahuac didn't even make the playoffs. In a district that weak.. one would figure that Anahuac would've had the guns to at least get in.

Hard to bet against this level of deep game experience. I'm pulling for you WV... but I say Gunter by 3+ scores.

I really think that relocation is the equalizer. Physically moving.. changing your family's permanent address. Change of employment. How is the state going to tell a student/family that the only reason they did that was for athletic benefit. Even if it was.. if it's verbally said and signed that it wasn't, then that's it. A parent can simply say that they couldn't afford to live in their previous location. Which may be true. Using a secondary address... "living" with a relative... sure. Red flags.

Here's where the issue is going to be. Actually.. just one of the issues. What if the parents buy a house in that district because it was more affordable? Or better living conditions? You already mentioned work. What if they didn't get along with a teacher / school employee / other students ? I'm playing devil's advocate here and I'm telling you that if a family uproots and moves, UIL better be careful determining why or why not that happened. "I know your dad took a job in Northshore, and y'all sold your house, and hired a moving company, and bought a house in Northshore, but your son's previous school has a way better academic rating so you guys obviously did all that for athletic purposes." I'm just saying... slippery slope.

There are a lot of assumptions made here that just because a student transfers schools, they were recruited. Maybe it was a personal choice for the kid or their parents.. If I had a kid that was a stud (insert sport) why wouldn't I look into potentially relocating to a district where their talents could be better showcased? Or get access to more team success. If I had a kid that wasn't receiving the education I thought they should be getting, I could move them to wherever I want.. Using whatever means I have access to. If that meant commuting to work or buying a house somewhere else.. try to stop me. Nothing has to be justified here.. by anyone. Other than establishing that said student/athlete did not move for athletic purposes according the the PAPF. "Homegrown" kids was prevalent when schools, school facilities, and school programs offered were on a more even playing field. Those days are done. Money has 100% extremely progressed some schools and left others in the dust. The state can't stop kids from changing schools. The state can't stop parents from taking jobs in a different city than their current address. The state can't stop grown adults from establishing residency somewhere other than where they currently live. Any of the aforementioned can happen for whatever reason the affected parties decide.

I have a close friend that has been coaching for several years.. including a short time in SeTx.. who says, "Life ends south of Hwy 7" when referring to why this area is seemingly behind.

Ya know.. just because a school is open enrollment doesn't mean that they have to accept ANY out of district student that tries to enroll. In fact, most schools check things such as testing history, attendance, discipline, etc.. And even allow students to enroll on a "conditions based" agreement. Open enrollment doesn't mean just let whoever wants to come show up and stay. If Lumberton is truly a closed enrollment campus, they may truly be missing out on some good students. What's the point of making you school into an educational facility where everybody wants to go to school, if you're going to limit who goes to school to who happens to live in the district?

Many schools are open enrollment nowadays for financial reasons. More students = more money from the state.

Also, it's difficult to govern in bigger cities (like the Metroplex) due to apartment complexes. Kids can literally change their permanent address easily and often. It's difficult to determine if they've moved for athletic purposes instead of their family relocating for whatever reason. Unless it's actually said.. which is unlikely. And becoming a student that live within the school district makes it less of a red flag.

No state championship in 9 seasons? It's believed that one should get 7 seasons max... Sounds like it's time to bring in an "Elite Coach". (rolls eyes sarcastically) All jokes aside.. fantastic job.

4th and 10 at midfield with 6 minutes to go.. not sure I go for it there. But that’s me. Hero/Zero moment.

2nd consecutive year. This is also why it’s justified sending 4 teams.

Using eligible players? Just wondering...