Cougar14.2

I mean, you watch the game and it’s hard not to say Crosby had the bigger, more athletic team? What was drastically different is the way the two teams were coached. College Station had a dynamic offense that got the ball to eight different receivers and six different ball carriers while Crosby’s approach is the exact same as it’s been the first ten games of the year. Giving it to Yarbrough as many times possible and hoping he would break one. I will say Crosby should’ve probably had at least one and probably two more scores due to drops by our X-receiver but 5-6 is 5-6. Crosby probably had ten sophomores start at some point this season so in normal times you would say the outlook is promising but I don’t think the fact that Crosby can’t win a game from the sideline will change no matter the talent/experience/etc., we put on the field during the Willis era. He’s 21-34 his last five years with zero winning seasons, it kind of is what it is at this point. There were some bright spots this year like the overall defensive play of the team but there’s no way you can take this system/culture into 6A and expect to compete.

13-8 final

Crosby scored 6 offensive points against the top two teams in the district this year. Some would call it process because we finished in 3rd place. I would say it’s the reason Willis couldn’t get a reputable OC to work for him. That’s a game Crosby would’ve won in a blowout just like the previous times we played Angleton but here we are. Maybe a miracle happens in College Station next week.

Crosby hasn’t beaten a team that finished the season over .500 during the Willis era. We’ll finish the year 5-6 for a total of 7-14 under his leadership. Crosby is the beneficiary of the weak district. Crosby had a chance to shake the current stigma and win an important district game against a squad with equal talent and lost by 46. We’ll finish in 3rd just like a lot of people thought before the season and it will look like improvement, but imagine if the UIL swapped us with Baytown Sterling? We would again be struggling to get to 2-8. Im happy for the kids and staff that get to go to the playoffs but I’m also realistic. We’re not out coaching anybody with equal talent.

Smh, luckily we play in a weak district so Crosby will still get the opportunity to go get blown out in College Station. Our inability to coordinate anything on offense two years in against anybody with remotely decent personnel is extremely disappointing to say the least.

Winner of this game will likely get the 4th playoff spot as both will have lost or will lose to North Shore, Atascocita and Summer Creek.

This will be the 7th time Atascocita and North Shore have played in the last four years. NS has blown 'Cita out a few times but in the games that were close relatively it was because of 'Cita's passing attack and the high level QB play that's been associated with them since Stump has taken over. Mack is a heck of a football player and the Eagle's staff must feel like he's a better RB than Tory Blaylock who's sitting on over 40 FBS offers since Mack got the bulk of the critical carries last year but I don't think he plays the QB position at as high a level as the 4/5 guys before him? I wouldn't have said it the previous three seasons but it feels like Atascocita is kind of overmatched in this one. Tory Blaylock may be the most highly recruited player out of the district behind Devin Sanchez but if we talking about pure RB ability I think I'm taking Kingwood RB Marquez Davis over both him and North Shore's D'andre Hardeman. I think switching to the sophomore QB has sparked Kingwood's offense but we'll see if they just played over their skis for a night in a rivalry game or if they're really a factor. Crazy stat that all four playoff teams from this district, which have been the same four, have all made it to at least the 3rd round the last three years.

The more I look at the matchup the better I feel about Crosby's chances if both teams play their best game. Against three common district opponents Crosby has a slightly larger average margin of victory at 31ppg vs La Porte's 28.3. I don't think La Porte will be able to throw Crosby out of loading the box. LP's offense doesn't look the same without the threat of Kay on the outside. If this game is played in the box like most expect it to be I think Crosby has a more than marginal advantage with the Windfont boys and the North Shore transfer Keenan Bradley finally turning into what we thought he would be when he enrolled. Not to mention Josiah Jones on the back end playing safety at a Pickney/Perry/Kirkwood level. What worries me is our schizophrenic offense. My assumption is that O'Fleherty and Johnson are going to have success leaning on La Porte's d-line but there will be times that Robinson/Wheeler are going to have to make plays from the QB position and neither has show the ability to consistently do so yet. I think there may be some mitigation since LP doesn't really rush the passer outside of blitzing #1 off the edge but Crosby is still going to need to show some competency throwing the ball. All the games I remember Crosby playing in Deer Park have been playoff games but if memory serves me correctly we've never won in Abshier stadium. Would be nice to change that tonight.

It's been a while since there was reason to to start a thread involving a Crosby game outside of complaining about the coaching. With both teams 4-3 on the season but coming into the game 4-0 in district play this one might be worth discussing. Teams are 1-1 since they've been in the district together with each team winning their home contest(La Porte's home game was at BH). This game will likely determine who gets to avoid a first round matchup with state ranked #6 College Station and a probably early exit. The loser of this game will still have an opportunity to finish in 2nd place and even win a share of the district championship with La Porte playing an undefeated Angleton next week and Crosby playing Angleton the week after. The district could very well end up in a three way tie for first place with Angleton, Crosby and La Porte all finishing 6-1 in district play. Fun few weeks to finish the season in 11-5A-D1 As far as the game goes it feels like a great matchup for this year's version of Crosby. La Porte's offense is run heavy and the strength of Crosby's defense is their front seven. Crosby has run the ball extremely well since district play has started, albeit against lower level competition, and based on what La Porte has shown on film personnel wise it looks like we should have continued success in that department. I think the key to the game from Crosby is getting La Porte in 3rd and 5+ situations where we can pick up stops on the run plays they'll try and some defended passes that will force punts in a potential lower scoring field position game. Crosby will also need to clean up some of the penalties and ball-handling from prior weeks if we want to give ourselves the best chance to win.

Well, Crosby gets to 4-0 in district play in large part to being the benefactor of a weak district. Tough start to the season but have set ourselves up for a couple shots at hosting a home playoff game . . . or dare I even say a district championship.

I thought Crosby would finish 3rd or 4th before the season started and it looks like we’ll at least finish 3rd. It’s disappointing because this is the type team and schedule Riotdan or Prieto could’ve finished at 9-1 with an opportunity for at least a regional semi appearance. That being said, I think very few of us thought Crosby would be at this point in the season and still have the opportunity to host a home playoff game. The runner-up probably still gets a brutal bi-district matchup with Pf. Weiss but if it’s Crosby I still think we relish the opportunity coming off a 2-8 season last year.

It looks like that because we played better overall. He’s been moving some players around the last couple of weeks and actually trying to get some of his athletes the ball which is a lot more “offensive coordinating” than he’s been doing during his time in Crosby. We’ll take the progress where we can get it though. We’re 3-0 in district play because we have better football players than three teams we’ve played. Again, you take the progress from the beginning of the year where we were losing to a team like Dayton who has half the talent we do. The issue is being consistently blown out by teams with equal or slightly better talent. Crosby is benefitting record-wise from a weak district but it’s helping us learn to win again. Thursday was the most swagger I’ve seen a Crosby team play with since Willis has been our coach. Wins are wins but if you’re objectively looking at what Crosby is considering progress after a year and a half under Willis it’s a game where we play two good quarters and then get shut out until late in the fourth quarter against a team with not near the personnel of La Porte or Angleton. Crosby could be a lot better than we are but I will admit this is the best we’ve looked under Willis. I guess it’s just going to take the kids overplaying his system and play-calling to achieve the results the last two coaches did?

Can’t believe y’all only scored 25 points on Friendswood. Was expecting a blowout. We aren’t very good and still won by 14

Little disappointing to give up that last TD. Feels like when need at least 21 more to be comfortable now. Still like how the defense is playing though, hopefully we’ll adjust out of that zone we haven’t been able to play all year.

Not sure, but I know that’s two weeks in a row the defense has scored a TD.