BS Wildcats

Good reply, it is not hard to see if a person wants anything illegal, they will use any means necessary. Thought his question was really self explanatory.

Like I said, if he wants it, he can get. Same as trying to burglar proof your home, if someone wants to rob you they will. No matter what type of gun laws the liberals want to pass, you will never keep them out if the hands of criminals. As for as a criminal getting a gun, just rob a honest person that has a right to own a gun and does.

That's what a few on here would believe

Gotta try and defend the "Chosen One" with whatever means possible

Never tried that

Fried Spam sandwich, bon appetit

Just make it a pain in the arse for the honest man

Don't forget potted meat, good stuff right there

Absolutely

Exactly why term limits are needed. No matter the party affiliation, after being in office for many years, they are all useless as tits on a boar hog.

Not singling you out, you are just the one that responded to that post. Nobody said anything about fox or msnbc, but you. That is why you were responded to.

Why bring up Fox? I believe he was talking media in general. Did not read where he singled out any media outlet.

Two of many

Just read about a girl in SC contracting a brain eating amoeba after swimming in a river. Have heard about a lot of these cases the last few years. I remember as a kid swimming in numerous lakes, ponds, and rivers. Don't know about doing that now.

At some point, someone with enough authority will realize that where there is smoke, there is fire when it comes to deaths surrounding the Clintons.

As far as your other question about an assault weapons ban, the problem with that is that Congress has no idea what they are. I have seen to many times that hold up an AR-15 and call it an assault rifle. I guess the idiots think that is what AR stands for. So if they have no clue, how can they try to govern it.

I can agree to that

Has to be a Democrat. That is absurd. I agree with what you said about background checks being used to deny as many ppl as possible the right to own a gun. It is a slippery slope.

Exactly

Maybe we should look at the type of crime a felon was convicted of. If it was an overt violent crime or one that involved a gun, then I feel they should lose their right to bear arms. I guess you could look at less violent felon crimes differently. As far as having their rights restored, it would still depend on type of crime committed.

Although I am definitely against the government trying to take away the right to bear arms, I do feel a background check for all gun purchases is a good thing. As far as what should be checked far, I'm not sure. A convicted felon, or an American citizen would be a start. No matter what is checked, if a criminal wants a gun, they will still be able to get their hands one. So, background checks, in my opinion will really do no good.

Wonder where the next attack on our soil will take place? Why do they think they have to let them come here in the first place? Hypothetically, if this were to happen here, how many Muslim countries would allow American refugees into their country? Not many.

Could very well happen

Why is it that differences of opinions have to have the racism card played? Just because my opinion is different than yours, does not mean I am a racist. There are some on here that want to call people racist because of differing views. A difference of philosophies does not mean racism. Few understand that.

Ridiculous