baddog

Since we are talking immigration, Obama deported 480,000 in 2012 alone. How many deportations were blocked by federal judges? Did they all receive due process? Of course not. All this federal judges BS is reserved for Trump. How democratic is that? Protecting gang criminals!!!! What is wrong with you people????

Stop acting like you’re the only one who knows anything. What I said rings true. They could never envision Biden’s invasion of 20 million migrants. They didn’t have drug smugglers, paid human traffickers, and violent criminals coming across the borders (which were much smaller then). Times were totally different then. Even though they had open borders and encouraged immigration, they were concerned about the non-contributing immigrants being worthy of becoming Americans. The immigrants back then weren’t blood suckers looking for a handout and toting flags of the country from which they seek asylum. You’re the one who needs to read and use common sense. Here’s an excerpt of Washington’s and Madison’s opinions: RELATED: The Trouble with the ‘Nation of Immigrants’ Argument No, not because “diversity” is our greatest value. No, not because Big Business needed cheap labor. And no, Madison asserted, “Not merely to swell the catalogue of people. No, sir, it is to increase the wealth and strength of the community; and those who acquire the rights of citizenship, without adding to the strength or wealth of the community are not the people we are in want of.” Madison argued plainly that America should welcome the immigrant who could assimilate, but exclude the immigrant who could not readily “incorporate himself into our society.” George Washington, in a letter to John Adams, similarly emphasized that immigrants should be absorbed into American life so that, “by an intermixture with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, laws: in a word soon become one people.” #share#Alexander Hamilton, relevant as ever today, wrote in 1802: “The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education, and family.”

Norway’s turn. Is that why it’s @ 400? Who knows for sure? Good thing is the resilience of America. We take our lumps and get right back at it no matter what.

It’s the way liberals operate. It doesn’t matter if millions of people rip off the government (taxpayers) as long as they can attempt to hang ONE on Trump, then there is justification……in their minds only.

Stocks rebounding after beginning the day in the red. Good luck to everyone.

Whitley only had 2 Ks, but I let it slide. Wee all make mistakes.

I watched the game and know the final. 3-2 is a typo I didn’t catch. Springer was a mistake. Thanks for the heads up.

Stros sweep the Jays with a 3-2 victory. Hader’s stats are good, but he always makes it interesting by walking the leadoff batter followed by a double.

Totally agree. I should clarify my like on Boyz post about the ppp loans. That would be for those who abused it….taking expensive vacations, buying Bugattis, etc….heck, they should go to jail.

Some people are so wrong……. Freedom of Speech: Limited Protections: The First Amendment protects a wide range of expression, including speech that is unpopular, offensive, or even hateful. However, it doesn't protect all forms of speech. For instance, incitement to violence, defamation, and obscenity are not protected. Exceptions to the Rule: The government can restrict speech in certain situations, such as to prevent violence, protect privacy, or maintain order. These restrictions are not always unlimited and must be narrowly tailored to achieve a legitimate government interest. Balancing Rights: The concept of free speech involves a delicate balance between protecting individual expression and the rights of others to be free from harm or harassment. Context Matters: The level of protection speech receives can also depend on the context in which it occurs. For example, speech on a college campus might be treated differently than speech on a public street corner. Social Norms: While the First Amendment provides legal protection for free speech, social norms and cultural context can also influence how speech is perceived and whether it is considered acceptable

I went to my bank the other day and told them I had paid a couple years on my truck note and I thought I had paid enough on it. When I told them I was defaulting on my loan, they got very upset. I wonder why? Trump will be garnishing wages and tax returns to get repayment.

Can’t find this on msm. I wonder why???? Fox won’t let me copy/paste. Homan vows to deport. [Hidden Content]

You have a tremendous amount of patience. The answer will probably be Holocaust survivors.

Stocks open high and still hovering around 1000. Did anyone buy low? Lmao

There were several sources I could have copy/pasted from. I picked the communist news network so that it wouldn’t be questioned. It’s the liberal’s life blood for info.