As I’ve stated before, the only way to achieve regime change is to put boots on the ground. It will mean a longer war, more expense, and sadly, the loss of American military personnel. Nobody wants that, but what other avenues are available? It’s why we are at an impasse.
True. Good thing the U.S. has the best military ever seen and their help was never needed. It’s nice to know who you can count on. We should abandon those bases.
It wasn’t dependent on Spain and Italy, two members of NATO, but it should be assumed even if the host country doesn’t assist with military help. U.S. fighter jets are present at these bases. Are they only there should Italy or Spain need defending. One day, we can return the favor. Help, America. We are being invaded. You can use our airfields now.
Of course you still didn’t answer. Shocker. Uncomfortable is what you think, childishness is truly what it is. You have attacked several times without provocation trying to bait a response. It’s called trolling and can have it.
You obviously don’t read my posts. I asked how you would have hit Iran harder and faster. Too late now. You’ll go to another thread. You can have it Porter. You’re the only one who knows anything. Sick of your personal attacks.
It ain’t gonna get done without boots on the ground. That would involve more time, money, and lives lost…..all the things you cry about everyday. That’s reality!
Sure am glad people on here don’t run their pie hole. Maybe if some of our so-called allies would have let us use their airfields, we could have hit them much harder and put more jets in the air. Just how would you have hit them harder and faster?