CardinalBacker

No. They benefitted most people, but not me. Example... prior to trumps plan, let’s say the standard destruction for a single person was $6000, but a person going long form could deduct $12000 from their tax liability. With the Trump plan the standard deduction was raised to $12,000, the person who previously itemized saw no actual benefit under the new plan. Guys who didn’t previously itemize made out. For instance, an employee deducting 20,000 business miles prior to the plan (20,000x.60 cents=$12,000 deduction at your top tax rate) at 25% top rate that single lost deduction would increase your tax liability by three grand.

Honestly, the tax cuts didn't help me. I've itemized for years and the increase in standard deductions makes my tax burden (itemized) practically identical to someone who just takes the standard deduction. ALSO, i've been deducting mileage driven on behalf of my employer and that particular deduction was wiped out with the Trump Tax cuts... unless you work for a politician, of course. "Employees who use their car for work can no longer take an employee business expense deduction as part of their miscellaneous itemized deductions reported on Schedule A. Employees can’t deduct this cost even if their employer doesn’t reimburse the employee for using their own car. This is for tax years after December 2017. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor. However, certain taxpayers may still deduct unreimbursed employee travel expenses, this includes Armed Forces reservists, qualified performing artists, and fee-basis state or local government officials."

EDITED BY ADMIN

Did you see where Trump revoked the rule about not having former staffers work as lobbyists on his last day in office? #preserveourwetlands

Truth hurts, my man.... I'll go as far as to say that Trump's first debate performance possibly cost him his second term. It was terrible, no doubt cost him countless undecided or moderate votes, and happened early in the mail-in voting period. When you add in the second debate that he forfeited, you're left with a decent third debate, but it was too little, too late, in my opinion, to lock down any undecideds. The end.

The first one was a bad joke... this one has legs.

Or, the fact that one dude didn't know how to act and therefore this guy got elected. Place blame where it belongs. It didn't have to be like this.

Ummm.... the crying after this election cycle is worse than anything I've seen in my lifetime.... without a question. The President refused to concede, skipped the inauguration, his supporters attacked the capitol, and the trial for starting the insurrection starts 2/8..... Repubs have far exceeded any snotty nosed dweeb behavior that we've ever seen before. Nice try, though.

My point is, with a pandemic raging Trump quit even acknowledging its existence once the vote totals started rolling in. No directives, no reports, no admonitions. He was purely focused on overturning the lawful election and nothing else. It’s why the vaccine rollout has been such a mess.... there was no plan.

Well, he’s doing what he promised. So that’s a plus, I guess. Unlike those knuckleheads that promised to “repeal and replace” Obamacare, and to make America great again. We’re in way worse shape than we were in ‘16.

If he does a single thing about the pandemic, it’ll be more than Trump did in the last 2.5 months of his presidency.

I think when Walker was indicted Dr Thomas knew that the writing was on the wall. He raked up his chips and got outta Dodge. You can say a lot of bad things about Dr Thomas, but he wasn’t a dummy.

That’s totally false. [Hidden Content] Calvin Walker was indicted in May of 2011. This is an article about then-super Dr Thomas from March of 2011. [Hidden Content] The garbage continued after Dr Thomas’s departure, but make no mistake... it was going on while he ran the show as well.

There’s just as much proof of voter fraud as there is that Trump called the troops losers.

No explanation needed.

It’s so funny.... all of y’all have spent the last two and half months arguing that disrespect isn’t a big deal (if it’s coming from Trump) and now you’re crying that our troops have been disrespected by the Dems. they’re all a bunch of losers according to trump anyways.

Hold on... y’all keep saying Trump’s disrespect should be overlooked because of the economy, but suddenly you’re all up in arms because of “disrespect” shown because troops are sleeping in a garage instead of tents? Y’all are delusional.

I was like.... all of those guardsman that did three tours in Iraq and Afghanistan are like "really?"

He dang sure hasn't done anything about it since Early November.

Right? I think the nuttiest part is that the two "yes" votes were from a lady who got booted when the state came on board and the son of a guy who had the same fate.

Oh, no doubt. My biggest gripe with Trump is that I feel like his behavior led to him not being re-elected. And that's a loss that we're all going to have to live with. No luck on that first female Pres thing.... I just don't see Biden finishing his first term. But you're right on the "women power" thing. Just yesterday ESPN was celebrating that Kelly Loeffler (that just lost the Senate Race in Georgia) was being forced to sell her WNBA Team. I guess all of that "we need women and minority owners" talk wasn't geared towards conservative white women, lol. [Hidden Content]

I was way off on this one... Stupid Philip Klein. I was glad to see that the issue is at rest for now. There's talk of putting the issue on the ballot for the next election (which I think is a joke), but I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

I'm telling you.... While you might be all "America First" and not really care how he behaved, the rest of the country doesn't feel that way. There's a lot of these guys on here that would still vote for Trump after he raped their daughters. And call you a snowflake if you wouldn't do the same.

I offer you the 12th Amendment to the Constitution in its entirety. The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;-The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;-The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President-The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. No provision for a return to the legislature. Here's the Electoral Count Act of 1887 that clarified further the counting of Electoral Votes. [Hidden Content] At no point does it say anything along the lines of what you're suggesting. It was pure garbage from the word "go," and a lot of Trump's most loyal followers "Hang Mike Pence" just lapped it all up like the idiots that they are. You claim " Tell me where it says in the constitution he can’t kick it back to the state Legislatures." It doesn't say he can, Genius. You say "It is not common for states to send 2 different sets of electors to congress." Exactly!!!! Because one set is legitimate and the other is not! And your argument is that "well, since there is something wrong here, by all means.... send it back for a do-over" as if fraudulently sending a second set of electors to be counted is reason enough to toss out the result of an election. The only proven attempted fraud in 2020 was when Trump tried to get Georgia to overturn the election returns on 1/2.

But that's your problem. There was never any proof offered up anywhere to support the allegations of "widespread fraud." Nowhere. Not a single place. Here's Donald's plan. "We'll allege fraud by way of affidavits, then point at the affidavits themselves as evidence of fraud." That's not how it works. And no court was EVER going to agree with Trump's plan to "throw out all mail-in ballots." Ever. Anywhere. THERE WAS NO PROOF. With no proof, no objections would ever be sustained at any level. State Court, Federal Court, at the Legislative Branch, Supreme Court.... NOWHERE. It doesn't matter what Rudy and Sidney Powell kept promising (but never delivered). "I heard Justice Roberts yelling that he didn't want riots!!!!" Did you tape it? Heck no. NO PROOF. What's so hard to understand about that?