CardinalBacker

[Hidden Content] "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it," the FDA tweeted. 😂🤣😂 I’m eating lunch in a restaurant (by myself, as usual… and I don’t know why) and dying laughing.

How did I forget Ivermectin? ”I’m not putting that unproven vaccine in my body! I’m gonna take horse de-wormer every other week instead!” Just three years ago y’all were giving credit to Tractor Supply for saving your lives and this week y’all boycotting ‘em. So ungrateful. i forgot how truly dumb the anti vax movement was.

Wrong again. The mandates were a result of 74 million people deciding on January 20th, 2021 that the vaccine was suddenly a bad idea. Like i said…. Overnight strong conservative men switched roles smelly liberal women who don’t shave their (arm) pits in regards to vaccines. Y’all commandeered “my body, my choice” from the liberals.

So you took it? “No.”

You probably flashed your badge every single time.

I think you misunderstood my post. That post had nothing to do with black people. My point is that trump fans were all about the vaccine, giving trump credit for operation warp speed, etc… until Biden got elected. Once the Dems got elected, the vaccine was a horrible idea to conservatives. The irony (hypocrisy, actually) is astounding. I had anti-vaxxer parents that I know personally who had NEVER had their kids vaccinated suddenly calling for mandates for the COVID vax. Then you had guys who had been in the military and gotten every vaccine known to man crying about being forced to take the COVID vax…. Like… really? Your party affiliation is showing.

Mandates are wrong. But even more wrong is refusing to take a certain vaccine for political reasons after an entire lifetime of taking other mandated vaccines “on principle.” I’m over here wishing that certain groups of people that stayed masked up for years felt just as strongly about using condoms for the last couple of decades.

You have no wealth to lose, obviously. Putting a little money together will cause you to start worrying about losing it all. Negligence has nothing to do with party affiliation. If a firm sends an employee out to a customer’s home, and that customer dies because of disease that our employee exposed them to, then a lawyer proves to a SETX jury that your firm didn’t do the bare minimum to protect the public/other employees…. Like getting vaccines? Then your firm is out of business. Guaranteed. I know a kid that hired in at Valero in ‘21. They told them that they don’t have to take the vaccine, but if they caught COVID during probation, it was over. You don’t have to take a vaccine… but nobody has to keep you employed, either. I don’t agree with the government mandating vaccines… I mean, polio and whooping cough weren’t that bad, really. And before you start “but the COVID vaccine wasn’t tested,” neither was the polio vaccine. And people lined up around the block to get their kids vaccinated because it wasn’t a political issue like COVID. You can literally tell how ignorant a person chooses to be by their vaccine stance. Suddenly every blue collar high dropout is an epidemiologist.

Wait til you see who your choices are. It’ll be Trump and somebody who beats trump by 10%+.

Trump got booed for mentioning that he took the booster. By then, the red-hatted fools all decided that the vaccine was bad. Not because of science, but because a new President got elected. [Hidden Content] But Rs turned on the vaccine because Trump was no longer in control, period. Based on zero science, just emotions and butt-hurt. To answer your question? Yes. Your employer should have the right to terminate you for refusing to vaccinate. Real life scenario. Early on the partners in our company decided that they all would take the vaccine. Part of our business is calling on clients, many of whom are elderly or infirm. Well, one of the partners lied. He didn’t get the vaccine, and as you can guess, he made service calls on several clients, many of which in different locations came down with it immediately after he visited. This was back when local health departments were doing tracing on the transmission of the disease. So, you have a situation where our people, through the usual course of business, infected clients, some of whom were hospitalized. His refusal and subsequent dishonesty put our clients and our other employees at great risk, not only medically, but any good attorney could easily prove that our firm hadn’t done EVERYTHING that they could have done to protect ourselves and our customers. Pure negligence. That guy should have been terminated. Absolutely. His “rights” s don’t include infecting other people because he didn’t like the changes in Washington. Because that’s all it was. He was 1000% pro vaccine until Biden got elected-then had a change of heart.

How’s that different than throwing your unwavering support behind someone who can’t win?

Whatever it takes to make sure she keeps her legs crossed, lol. Edit: NGL, I've got a feeling it would be a good time.

Lol... vaccines weren't the problem until the Dems got elected. "Operation Warp Speed" should have been reason enough to get Trump re-elected, right? The facts remain that the virus was defeated by God and good vaccines. If you argue with either of those two reasons, you're wrong, IMO. If you lined up for 187 vaccinations during basic training but thing our military shouldn't have to take the Covid vax, you don't have a problem with mandated vaccinations, you have a problem with you political reasonings interfering with your good sense. I remember when only liberal fruitcakes refused to have their kids vaccinated and y'all didn't want those hippy kids going to school with your kids. Even though most of you are morbidly obese, eat like over-the-road truck drivers, and do whatever the complete opposite of exercise is. Gotta think about your health before taking a vaccine, though. BTW.... whatever happened to all of those conservative researchers that "proved" the covid vaccine caused your blood cells to mutate, contained dead baby parts, and tiny microchips? I miss those guys.

Well, we could have beaten them with anybody but Trump.... but "we" weren't having that. So enjoy your Harris Presidency.

Oh.... and all of those charges y'all planned on hanging on "The Big Guy?" He was immune as VP, too.

Yeah... they kinda made a big ol' poop sandwich when they nominated a VP solely based on her race and gender. That's not just some conspiracy theory, that's what Biden said he was gonna do, and he did. Now the Ds are gonna have to sit down at the table and take a big ol' bite. But at least she'll have immunity as the President if she gets out of line, lol.

It's more than just 15 minutes... the inspectors always find something that MUST be repaired before it'll pass inspection. If you decline the work, they still charge you for a failed inspection... you can return after you make the "needed" repairs and they'll sticker it for free, but where's the fun in that? "You're gonna need some new wiper blades... that'll be 74.95. That brings your total to $98.76 today." Like I said... the farm truck could use a set of tires but "a few thousand more miles" actually means "a few more years" when you average 2500 miles per year, max. I just don't want to lay down $1500 for a set of tires just to get my inspection so I can get my registration renewed for the few times a year I need to go to town for diesel or whatever. By my math, it would be cheaper to just risk it until January.

I'm just saying.... if the left wants to scream about how another Trump Presidency will be the end of our Democracy (scare tactic, right?) then the Supreme Court comes out with some complete BS about a President having immunity for criminal wrongdoings (which is nowhere in our Constitution... you know, the one that the Right loves so much).... then you have the President coming out and claiming Presidential immunity for actions taken to remain in power after getting his big fat S turned red in the election... while simultaneously calling for congressional members who oppose Trump to be brought before a military tribunal under charges of treason? How very Saddam Hussein of him. Well, maybe that Democrat scare tactic isn't just "the sky is falling" after all. The Rs in the Senate failed America when they didn't convict Trump in that second impeachment trial. It let the Red Hatted Fools push to renominate him again (after he tried to halt the peaceful transfer of power last time) and now we're all going to be worse off for it. Because the next time a "d" gets into office, they're going to take full advantage of the new immunity the conservative justices just created for them. What SHOULD have happened is that this ACTIVIST supreme court should have stayed away from creating new laws (Like they did with Roe v Wade, and are now doing with this verdict on Presidential Immunity), then heard the appeal of a Trump conviction in this case on Constitutional grounds... you know, the kind of grounds that the SC was created to interpret. The President shouldn't be finding himself in Federal Court, in front of an activist Judge, fighting for his freedom on baseless charges. But you don't fix that by giving a President free rein to do whatever criminal acts he wants. By the Supreme Court (and Trump's) logic, if Joe Biden ordered the murder of Trump tomorrow, he would be immune from prosecution because it was an act that he (Biden) believed was in the best interest of the country. That's scary.

From the article you didn’t read: “When pressed by Collins whether using a "false slates of electors" would constitute enough for a trial, Scharf (Trump’s attorney) denied that the Trump team had used false slates and said using "alternate slates" was an "official act." If Trump’s attorney said it on Trump’s behalf in relation to another criminal case in which Trump will refuse to testify, then yes… that’s Trump’s position.

Trump is already claiming that trying to overturn the election was “official.” [Hidden Content] While simultaneously calling for Liz Cheney to be brought up on Treason charges. [Hidden Content] This is going to go badly.

I’m kinda grumpy… this law won’t go into effect until January, but my registration (and therefore inspection) are due now. But they’re going to say that I need new tires… I’m down, bad.

Just remember… for every action, there is an equal an opposite reaction. The rules won’t apply for democrat presidents, either.

From wiki: In Democratic National Conventions, superdelegates—described in formal party rules as the party leaders and elected official (PLEO) category—make up slightly under 15% of all convention delegates. Before 2018, Democratic superdelegates were free to support any candidate for the presidential nomination in all rounds of balloting. (This contrasts with pledged delegates, who were selected based on the party presidential primaries and caucuses in each U.S. state, in which voters choose among candidates for the party's presidential nomination.) In 2018, the Democratic National Committee reduced the influence of superdelegates by barring them from voting on the first ballot at the Democratic National Convention, allowing them to vote only in a contested convention. The problem as I understand it is that a candidate needs 1,976 delegates to lock down the nomination, and Biden already 3,894 delegates pledged to him. There won't be contest at the convention if the delegates vote the way that they're pledged to do... and supposedly they have no ability to change their vote to another candidate. [Hidden Content]

My understanding of the situation is that Biden already has more than enough pledged delegates to win the Dem nomination, and there’s no mechanism within the DNC rules to “sub in” a different candidate. The only option for Biden to be replaced would be for Biden himself to decline the nomination and trigger a new candidate to be elected during the D convention in August-this is what I expect to see happen. But there would doubtlessly be a bloodbath during that selection process. People who believe Harris should be the nominee, moderates vs radicals, and the fact would remain that the dem voters won’t have a say in the eventual nomination. It’s a mess. It also seems like Biden has no plans to step down after the debate disaster.

I think even she would have a decent shot if not for her age. I think she was a victim of her own success with the media in 2016. I think a lot of people believed that she had it in the bag so they no-showed on Election Day. But you don’t have to worry because once a major political party throws its weight behind a candidate but he/she loses… they don’t get another chance. except for Trump.