Jump to content

purpleeagle

Members
  • Posts

    2,844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by purpleeagle

  1. A rebuilding year for Carthage. Should be pretty good next year/
  2. Calprep computer projected score has it Nederland 38 Santa Fe 13
  3. Calprep computer projected score has it Silsbee 31 Bridge City 13
  4. E. Chambers usual weak schedule catches up with them. There wins were over Kountze (0-3), H. Jeff.(1-2)who's only win was over a 0-3 team, and H. Fannett (1-2) who's only win was over a 0-3 team. Woodville's schedule has not been much stronger. Woodville wins this one by two scores.
  5. The computer rating (calprep) has Woodville 34 E.Chambers 22.
  6. Sabine Pass has the numbers to compete in 2A-2. (138).Kids lose interest with a losing program. They cannot go 6 man. Numbers to high. Burkeville could and should go 6 man (74) kids in high school.
  7. Interesting, Calprep computer rated scores for some local games. Jasper 16 WO-S 17, Gilmer 21 Newton 48, PN-G 28 Nederland 31, Silsbee 7 WO-S 27, E.Chambers 22 Woodville 34, Crosby 35 WO-S 19
  8. Right, I believe they (Carthage) finished 3rd in their district and won state that year.
  9. My top 5 are Newton - WO-S - Woodville- Jasper - Silsbee
  10. Don't count the Mustangs out. The heart of a Mustang is very big.
  11. WO-S fans should move on from this game. WO-S is going through growing pains. Newton will lose a ton of people next year and will have to go through the same growing pains. WO-S will be all right as long as Cornell it there. Just in case WO-S want's to get rid of him, there is a long list of school that would love to have him, including Newton. WO-S will be all right. Regardless of what happens in pre district games, WO-S will walk through their district and you might just see them and Newton at AT&T stadium.
  12. WO-S did not hold the score down. The field held the score down for both teams. I walked across the field before the start of the game and it was like walking in the marsh. I walked across the field after the game and it was debits everywhere. Neither team could cut without slipping. Worst condition I have ever seen. Both teams were exhausted after the game. Each step you would take had your feet sinking into the turf about 2 inches. Hope WO-S gets that bond passed for new turf. The conditions were very bad for both teams.
  13. After playing both Silsbee and WO-S, I see no way Silsbee will beat WO-S.
  14. Nothing but respect for both teams. Two great teams with tradition. Best of luck for both teams throughout the playoffs.
  15. Remember, It was WO-S who did not want to play Newton.
  16. One of Silsbee's problems is the they have given up 104 points in two game while scoring only28. Silsbee is way over rated this year. They will give up another 40+ Friday night.
  17. Newton had three players hurt last week. Two are D1 players. One of those players was out last week also. Not making excuses, WO-S may have a few players out also, but I hope not. The Newton people have a lot of respect for WO-S and I believe WO-S has the same for Newton. Win or lose, Newton and W0-S will still be respected programs.
  18. This year and next year before things start getting better. Kirbyville's JV was just as bad as their varsity. Hopefully the kids will buy into his program and the people will have patience . No coach is going to change this program over night. Best of luck to you coach Jones.
  19. 58 to 0 at halftime. Newton only scored 13 points the second half. Newton did keep the score down.
  20. Last years score between Newton/Silsbee was Newton 41 Silsbee 17. also, Silsbee 0-1 vs. Newton 1-0 not Silsbee 0-1 vs. Newton 0-1.
  21. Could not be any worse then the Newton/EC game last year.
×
×
  • Create New...