I am not sure why this topic has gone to the sugar daddy page. I have coached for and against all these kids at one time or another. I firmly feel that all are and will be division on players. At the same time i feel that feguson, murphy and riley are the better of the pack. Bunner is also top of the line, when you get that good the slim margin of victory has to go to experience and competition played against. I feel bunner and the mcdonald kid from silsbee are great, but lack of high end competition and experience make them exactly what they are; great shortstops, great pitchers, and "potential" d-1 players. To say that bunner is the best would be ann opinion and one that deserves to be heard. In my opinion it is not a debate but someone sure likes their vidor pirates. By the way keeping or losing a job has nothing to do with assessing talent, they all have it and it will be interesting to see what happens with the bunner and mcdonald kid. we already know ferguson and murphy are d-1. I am sure kyle green would love this page.