Jump to content

setxathlete14

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,926

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

setxathlete14 last won the day on August 23

setxathlete14 had the most liked content!

Reputation

631 Excellent

See reputation activity

Recent Profile Visitors

7,385 profile views
  1.    tyrionskywalker reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  2.    FearTheSpear reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  3. setxathlete14
    You don't have to be open enrollment to get better ones there. All you need is a mailbox.
  4.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  5. setxathlete14
    People are nieve. Can't win a Kentucky derby with a mule. The great repetitive teams have both not one or the other.
  6. setxathlete14
    So you're telling us every athlete on png roster has not been recruited?
  7.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  8.    WOSdrummer99 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  9.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  10.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  11.    Rob Corpus reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  12.    JB94 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  13.    Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  14.    NHSBulldogFan reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  15.    wo-s#1 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  16. setxathlete14
    Better Athletes mean nothing without decent coaching. Prime reference: WOS.
  17.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  18. setxathlete14
    No don't do that. Lol
  19.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: South Oak Cliff (56) vs Port Neches-Groves (14) - FINAL
  20. setxathlete14
    Yes they are. Called a hold on SOC on the PNG redzone pass play. Also the lineman was almost in the endzone looking for a block before the ball was thrown too lol
  21.    CardinalBacker reacted to a post in a topic: 2024 WOS Mustangs
  22. setxathlete14
    Smh
  23.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: Can I get some respect now!!!. Woodville goes to state!!
  24.    PlayActionPass reacted to a post in a topic: Livingston Open
  25. setxathlete14
    Offensive scheme does not dictate success it's the execution, attitude and effort within any systems.
  26.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: Livingston Open
  27. setxathlete14
    1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  28. setxathlete14
    Opting is always an option. Are they considering any BC assistants? Highly qualified after that season they put up.
  29. setxathlete14
    I won't even say anything or stir anything up other than great work kiddos.... Well deserved hard working young men..
  30. setxathlete14
    Big hit at qb spot might have to change philosophy...But i think so as well.
  31. setxathlete14
    Thanks for clarification.
  32.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: Longview Pine Tree (35) vs Bridge City (28) - FINAL
  33. setxathlete14
    That's why I put that statement in parenthesis.
  34. setxathlete14
    No i read that from the smoaky forum itself. Either way I'm not sure how much it really matters other than answering the simple question. Tearing my hide up 🤣🤣🤣
×
×
  • Create New...