setxathlete14

Enjoy your ride. This will probably be one of your last few attempts to compete for district wins. 😉

Southeasttexas express usually does play by play audio. Im not aware of any streaming from Lumberton. Hopefully they can chime in

Though technically wrong in this situation...I do believe lcm is better with him on the sidelines. Thats a pretty decent loss with him out imo.

Very very little chance regardless lol

UIL mentioned that.

Never claimed to be anything but better than bridge city most years. Most have always recognized how weak this district is. And that's why bc wanted to try and take advantage of some more wins.

Your statements became irrelevant the moment you said BC was "playing up a weight class" in this district. Past that not many paying much attention to what you post lol

Nor OF

Yeah they cared so much about getting the watch back they called a UIL meeting.

This is 98% a dad saying his qb son is coming up and wants him to be in a passing offense lol

Care to revisit this convo? Maybe I missed it when they even remotely suggested thats what BC was looking for in their statements or concerns.

💯

Slot t isn't the problem thats a very functional and proven offense for smaller kids. Deweyville, OF and vidors most productive offensive success have been that system..... I take it the defense wasn't any better with all that athleticism?

Right,wrong or indifferent after hearing this entire situation and BC sups comments if BC had won this game we "more likely than not" wouldn't have had UIL involvement nor this entire fiasco.

My disdain is BCs intentions were clear to me.... They wanted an lcm forfeiture. They weren't concerned with getting the watch returned or refunded or anything of that nature.

Ahhh more slot t complaints. Are you suggesting the hyper athletic Buna switch to a spread attack?

Someone help me here. I watched the entire thing. NOT 1 single time did BC bring up just wanting their watch back and/or ethical decision making or lack there of, recouping funds. Why they needed the watch back.... BCs ONLY discussion and complaint and commments were on lcm competitive advantage. And bringing up stats and their loss since we're talking about tones. Bc only wanted lcm forfeiture here. They didn't expound on anything else complaint wise.

Bc sup tried to claim competitivie disadvantage because they had to turn the bands off. But also said their terminology of plays was very basic and simple. Huge disadvantage 🤣🤣🤣 for ehat were stated as "master planners" in coaches

Yeah I was hoping they went down that bumpy road. Care to expound on the combined record of your previous opponents before lcm? Since highlighted that was your only loss

Thats not the tone I perceived or they would have made that action

Blatantly false information. But I guess that what these threads are for.

There is no asterisk. Evidence was throughly reviewed and beat to death.

So that makes a tie for 1st. Not 2nd?

Freshman: jv: Lcm 13. Lcm 30 Lumberton 6. Lumberton 28 9-1 ovr dist. champs. 8-2 ovr dist. champs

Thats a big straw. Im not implying anything. There's 0 doubt current district is one of the weakest in the state. And the exact reason why BC/HJ and liberty opted up. This is old news. And kind of irrelevant to thread here. Sorry if I took it off track