That's not coming from them. Specifically stated THE reason for losses were the 3/4 starters were out. Which is a valid point. I'm just giving them a hard time.
I disagree....The magnifying Glass on that situation was absurd. Way more absurd than it should have been. All the way across the board people were legit concerned lcm was gaining wos starters for the first time in history.
Pretty simple x and o there. Good players missing is good players missing. That's impactful regardless of your opinion on WHY they're missing or if they've played a snap . LCM still won games with multiple starters out. We didn't use that excuse even though it may have been a valid one had we lost.
Funnier situation is the one who went back, spent his entire year last year playing on jv waiting om eligibility, then goes back and was a day 1 starter for them... sends a great message there lol
Let say, Lumbertons qb moves to Silsbee or wherever else....... never plays a down for them. Expected to suit up and play the next week. You're telling me that wouldn't be an impactful player? Blasphemy...
Key players missing is key players missing I didn't know the reason they're out changes whether they're impactful or not... BUT we're in good shape either way. Just NOT as good as we would be lol
Well this one worked for Lumberton at the beginning of the year. We can use it too????. Our starting rb isn't back this week. They said next week I think he's eligible 🤣🤣
I'm curious to see how they do without the All star group and willy ray smith finalist qb... once the 07 group was gone is was back to shambles iirc... I'm wondering if it will be a similar trend.
Next year will be a more telling sign of coaching for them..... in my opinion.
Lcms most talented group was peevys first year..