Jump to content

Rez

Members
  • Posts

    2,300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Rez

  1. 4 minutes ago, GCMNation5 said:

    There is a lot more to it. Ill leave it at that. But I will say yes they should just let him play. The kid is a good kid not matter the situation.

    I’m curious what more there is, unless it would be in bad taste to share here. 

  2. 38 minutes ago, GCMNation5 said:

    Yes. He was a sophomore last  year.

    Wait — this kid moved over a year ago? Let him play. I don’t know the full background to this story, but it seems to me that the transfer rules exist to prevent opportunistic moves that would arise in a recruiting-type situation. If a kid actually moves for that long, I can’t imagine what the real hang up is. There is no rule against really moving, even if the move is partially or even fully motivated by a kid wanting to play somewhere. If a kid moves because he wants to be in a certain school’s marching band, does anyone even care? Students are allowed their preferences. I think enforcement of these rules has gotten beyond the original intended scope. But there are certainly things I don’t know. Without more, this sounds ridiculous. 

  3. All I’ll say is 1) the season ain’t over, 2) Bulldogs still might beat PNG, and 3) if it really is that bad, it will only be for a year. Remember PNG in 2012 (2-8). The seniors were terrible, but the guys below knew what to do to make it work the next year. 

  4. 3 minutes ago, BHFAN said:

    Unless PNG and Ned are leading the district everyone wants to call it weaek. Last year we were only better because PNG had boy wonder:) BH I hope can get over the hump and beat PNG, but for this week we must stay focused on a pretty good Gander squad 

    You read my mind as I was typing haha 

×
×
  • Create New...