-
Posts
2,009 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Reputation Activity
-
Rez got a reaction from jake94 in Vidor 29 Nederland 28/FINAL (OT)
Slightly off-topic, but not really: Can someone please teach Harold Mann how to pronounce "Quirante"? While we're at it, "Celaya", not "Celalya".
-
Rez reacted to Ned Nederlander in Vidor 29 Nederland 28/FINAL (OT)
I wish everyone realized how stupid they sound when they say (fill in the blank's) referees are here. All of the crews are from a wide area and the coaches can veto a crew they don't want. Do you really think that Jeff Matthews would allow a "Nederland" crew to call the game?
-
Rez got a reaction from class-99 Indians in Port Neches-Groves 34 Lumberton 14/FINAL
Not to dog on McZeal, because despite it all he is a very important part of the PNG team, but man, I wish he had a little more Jayce Nelson/Kaleb Sparks/Jeremiah Rose/Spencer Deron/Caisen Sullivan etc in him. Those guys would catch anything in their zip code and kill themselves to get it done. I wish McZeal showed a little more fire. Again, he is a fantastic player and athlete, but I wish he was more reliable as a receiver. I think I agree with Broschon that he might be more effective at TE. Open up the middle for us for sure.
-
Rez got a reaction from PNGFan in Port Neches-Groves 34 Lumberton 14/FINAL
Not to dog on McZeal, because despite it all he is a very important part of the PNG team, but man, I wish he had a little more Jayce Nelson/Kaleb Sparks/Jeremiah Rose/Spencer Deron/Caisen Sullivan etc in him. Those guys would catch anything in their zip code and kill themselves to get it done. I wish McZeal showed a little more fire. Again, he is a fantastic player and athlete, but I wish he was more reliable as a receiver. I think I agree with Broschon that he might be more effective at TE. Open up the middle for us for sure.
-
Rez got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in PNG @ LUMBERTON
Honestly, I'm starting to agree with the people who are seeing a trap game.
-
Rez got a reaction from studd88 in PNG @ LUMBERTON
Haha. Exactly. I don't come on this site to read Shakespearian prose. I want to talk football with people who love it.
-
-
-
-
Rez reacted to Bigdog in PNG @ LUMBERTON
Same argument Vidor makes almost every year, smh. All returning starters are not created equal. Returning starters from a "D" that gave up 42 pts vs PNG and 51 vs Nederland isn't the same as returning starters that held them down under 25 or less.
-
-
Rez reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity in PEEK-A-BOO.......
I rather fly under the radar, rankings dont matter come week12.
-
Rez reacted to prepballfan in PEEK-A-BOO.......
I dont normally agree with you publicly about the INdians but your probably right on about this one
-
-
Rez reacted to L-Train11 in PNG @ LUMBERTON
We have the pieces, now we just gotta put it together lol
-
Rez got a reaction from CAL2TEX in PNG @ LUMBERTON
Where is the evidence that Lumberton has a "decent" D? Lumberton has played one full game against a school with less than 600 kids (and isn't WO-S), a school that is a perennial bottom feeder in its own classification. PNG already has shown the ability to make stops against good backs when it matters, so I don't know what indications exist that PNG won't stop Lumberton's run game. There isn't a Calvin Tyler playing for Lumberton, and even if there was, we would be okay. Lumberton may be better than recent years -- Maybe even better than last year. But Lumberton is unproven, and history is not on its side (Lumberton is 1-16 against PNG all time, and that one victory was in a year where PNG went 3-6).
Think about that-- At Lumberton's best (2008), they managed to beat one of PNG's worst by a mere seven points.
Statistics don't win games, but they are at least an interesting indicator of potential future outcomes. In the series, PNG has outscored Lumberton 656-238. PNG averages 38.6 ppg against Lumberton. Lumberton averages 14. Last year, when Lumberton finally looked like it might be turning a corner, PNG scored easily and often.
Lumberton will have to stop PNG's QB, running back, receivers, and o-line, all of whom have demonstrable ability to produce. Lumberton also has to somehow overpower a PNG defensive line that has been fairly successful against much faster backs than what Lumberton has waiting in the stables. I'll admit, I haven't seen Lumberton play, but I did get a chance to see PNG against WO-S in August (scrimmage) -- PNG can hang with the run.
It may be a good game -- It might also be incredibly boring.
-
Rez reacted to L-Train11 in PNG @ LUMBERTON
Thanks for the history lesson.
The "decent d" reference was because we have 9 returning starters, so basically the same defense that put a stop to Vidor's infamous run game last year, and we did the same thing that yall did to Calvin Tyler last year, except he played with a dual threat qb that was actually utilized. Everyone on this site knows that the play calling from Silsbee was horrible that night, if they would have let Jones run/throw more it may have been a much closer game.
Now, you are 100% correct that we do not have Calvin Tyler running out of the back field. But when he puts 180 yards on yall with a line that has been labeled as "soft" by many people, then ill take our chances with a very physical offensive line... Or can I say that since we haven't played a game yet?
I've seen both teams scrimmage, and ive been both teams against a very weak opponent. Do I believe that we can win? Certainly. Will it happen? Nobody knows till Friday night.
-
Rez got a reaction from NDNation in PNG @ LUMBERTON
Where is the evidence that Lumberton has a "decent" D? Lumberton has played one full game against a school with less than 600 kids (and isn't WO-S), a school that is a perennial bottom feeder in its own classification. PNG already has shown the ability to make stops against good backs when it matters, so I don't know what indications exist that PNG won't stop Lumberton's run game. There isn't a Calvin Tyler playing for Lumberton, and even if there was, we would be okay. Lumberton may be better than recent years -- Maybe even better than last year. But Lumberton is unproven, and history is not on its side (Lumberton is 1-16 against PNG all time, and that one victory was in a year where PNG went 3-6).
Think about that-- At Lumberton's best (2008), they managed to beat one of PNG's worst by a mere seven points.
Statistics don't win games, but they are at least an interesting indicator of potential future outcomes. In the series, PNG has outscored Lumberton 656-238. PNG averages 38.6 ppg against Lumberton. Lumberton averages 14. Last year, when Lumberton finally looked like it might be turning a corner, PNG scored easily and often.
Lumberton will have to stop PNG's QB, running back, receivers, and o-line, all of whom have demonstrable ability to produce. Lumberton also has to somehow overpower a PNG defensive line that has been fairly successful against much faster backs than what Lumberton has waiting in the stables. I'll admit, I haven't seen Lumberton play, but I did get a chance to see PNG against WO-S in August (scrimmage) -- PNG can hang with the run.
It may be a good game -- It might also be incredibly boring.
-
Rez got a reaction from RoschonsBigBro in PNG @ LUMBERTON
Where is the evidence that Lumberton has a "decent" D? Lumberton has played one full game against a school with less than 600 kids (and isn't WO-S), a school that is a perennial bottom feeder in its own classification. PNG already has shown the ability to make stops against good backs when it matters, so I don't know what indications exist that PNG won't stop Lumberton's run game. There isn't a Calvin Tyler playing for Lumberton, and even if there was, we would be okay. Lumberton may be better than recent years -- Maybe even better than last year. But Lumberton is unproven, and history is not on its side (Lumberton is 1-16 against PNG all time, and that one victory was in a year where PNG went 3-6).
Think about that-- At Lumberton's best (2008), they managed to beat one of PNG's worst by a mere seven points.
Statistics don't win games, but they are at least an interesting indicator of potential future outcomes. In the series, PNG has outscored Lumberton 656-238. PNG averages 38.6 ppg against Lumberton. Lumberton averages 14. Last year, when Lumberton finally looked like it might be turning a corner, PNG scored easily and often.
Lumberton will have to stop PNG's QB, running back, receivers, and o-line, all of whom have demonstrable ability to produce. Lumberton also has to somehow overpower a PNG defensive line that has been fairly successful against much faster backs than what Lumberton has waiting in the stables. I'll admit, I haven't seen Lumberton play, but I did get a chance to see PNG against WO-S in August (scrimmage) -- PNG can hang with the run.
It may be a good game -- It might also be incredibly boring.
-
Rez got a reaction from class-99 Indians in PNG @ LUMBERTON
Where is the evidence that Lumberton has a "decent" D? Lumberton has played one full game against a school with less than 600 kids (and isn't WO-S), a school that is a perennial bottom feeder in its own classification. PNG already has shown the ability to make stops against good backs when it matters, so I don't know what indications exist that PNG won't stop Lumberton's run game. There isn't a Calvin Tyler playing for Lumberton, and even if there was, we would be okay. Lumberton may be better than recent years -- Maybe even better than last year. But Lumberton is unproven, and history is not on its side (Lumberton is 1-16 against PNG all time, and that one victory was in a year where PNG went 3-6).
Think about that-- At Lumberton's best (2008), they managed to beat one of PNG's worst by a mere seven points.
Statistics don't win games, but they are at least an interesting indicator of potential future outcomes. In the series, PNG has outscored Lumberton 656-238. PNG averages 38.6 ppg against Lumberton. Lumberton averages 14. Last year, when Lumberton finally looked like it might be turning a corner, PNG scored easily and often.
Lumberton will have to stop PNG's QB, running back, receivers, and o-line, all of whom have demonstrable ability to produce. Lumberton also has to somehow overpower a PNG defensive line that has been fairly successful against much faster backs than what Lumberton has waiting in the stables. I'll admit, I haven't seen Lumberton play, but I did get a chance to see PNG against WO-S in August (scrimmage) -- PNG can hang with the run.
It may be a good game -- It might also be incredibly boring.
-
Rez reacted to Past Pirate in Vidor @ Beaumont Central
I don't see this one as close as everyone else. I hope am wrong, but not buying into last weeks win by Vidor. Central easily takes this one by 35-7.
-
-
Rez got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in PNG v GCM video broadcast?
Haha thanks -- Believe me, I won't be "brown nosing" when PNG plays PA.
-
Rez reacted to WOSgrad in PNG v GCM video broadcast?
My only caution is that texaslive.com has gone pay per view. The subscription is not that expensive, but there is one.
-
Rez reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity in PNG v GCM video broadcast?
Png continuously scoring on GCM tonight might make your head hurt worse.