Realville

Boy that didn’t take long to take that truthful video down from credible doctors! Wake up people! We are being played on so many levels!

So are you trying to say Carol Swain who is black is selling out her own race? What’s your definition of powerful? I know none of these people.

Oh please, do tell.

Enlighten me about what is the other half of the truth besides you being bitter. Oh an please tell me if there is anything that she wrote that is incorrect.

She’s a Female Black Professor Of Political Science and Law at Vanderbilt University. Maybe you ought to send her a tweet an tell her she doesn’t know what’s she’s talking about or maybe she’s just trying to suppress Black Americans.

THE INCONVENIENT TRUTH ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY When you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political party comes to mind? The Republicans? Or, the Democrats? Most people would probably say the Democrats. But this answer is incorrect. Since its founding in 1829, the Democratic Party has fought against every major civil rights initiative, and has a long history of discrimination. The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynchings, and fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s. In contrast, the Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party. Its mission was to stop the spread of slavery into the new western territories with the aim of abolishing it entirely. This effort, however, was dealt a major blow by the Supreme Court. In the 1857 case Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court ruled that slaves aren’t citizens; they’re property. The seven justices who voted in favor of slavery? All Democrats. The two justices who dissented? Both Republicans. The slavery question was, of course, ultimately resolved by a bloody civil war. The commander- in-chief during that war was the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln – the man who freed the slaves. Six days after the Confederate army surrendered, John Wilkes Booth, a Democrat, assassinated President Lincoln. Lincoln’s vice president, a Democrat named Andrew Johnson, assumed the presidency. But Johnson adamantly opposed Lincoln’s plan to integrate the newly freed slaves into the South’s economic and social order. Johnson and the Democratic Party were unified in their opposition to the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery; the 14th Amendment, which gave blacks citizenship; and the 15th Amendment, which gave blacks the vote. All three passed only because of universal Republican support. During the era of Reconstruction, federal troops stationed in the south helped secure rights for the newly freed slaves. Hundreds of black men were elected to southern state legislatures as Republicans, and 22 black Republicans served in the US Congress by 1900. The Democrats did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935. But after Reconstruction ended, when the federal troops went home, Democrats roared back into power in the South. They quickly reestablished white supremacy across the region with measures like black codes – laws that restricted the ability of blacks to own property and run businesses. And they imposed poll taxes and literacy tests, used to subvert the black citizen’s right to vote. And how was all of this enforced? By terror -- much of it instigated by the Ku Klux Klan, founded by a Democrat, Nathan Bedford Forrest. As historian Eric Foner - himself a Democrat - notes: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.” President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, shared many views with the Klan. He re-segregated many federal agencies, and even screened the first movie ever played at the White House - the racist film “The Birth of a Nation,” originally entitled “The Clansman.” A few decades later, the only serious congressional opposition to the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 came from Democrats. Eighty percent of Republicans in Congress supported the bill. Less than 70 percent of Democrats did. Democratic senators filibustered the bill for 75 days, until Republicans mustered the few extra votes needed to break the logjam. And when all of their efforts to enslave blacks, keep them enslaved, and then keep them from voting had failed, the Democrats came up with a new strategy: If black people are going to vote, they might as well vote for Democrats. As President Lyndon Johnson was purported to have said about the Civil Rights Act, “I’ll have them n*****s voting Democrat for two hundred years.” So now, the Democratic Party prospers on the votes of the very people it has spent much of its history oppressing. Democrats falsely claim that the Republican Party is the villain, when in reality it’s the failed policies of the Democratic Party that have kept blacks down. Massive government welfare has decimated the black family. Opposition to school choice has kept them trapped in failing schools. Politically correct policing has left black neighborhoods defenseless against violent crime. So, when you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political party should come to mind? I’m Carol Swain, professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University, for Prager University. And the Truth shall set you Free!🇺🇸

It’s a little long but I promise your gonna want to listen especially to the message from Dr Emanuel who is from Houston. She is at about the 5:25 mark. Talk about PASSION for your patients! This woman has it! These are Physicians from across America who came to Washington DC so they could get their message out to the American People. There is a cure for this virus an Big Pharma is suppressing it.

I doubt very serious that there doing anything illegal. I don’t know what the upside would be to do something like that.

BAM!! Shhh....Don’t tell nobody!😂

Gumbo is always better the 2nd Day! The marination process is complete by the 2nd day! Man my wife’s gumbo is legit! My 2 boys always beg my wife to make gumbo since they learned how to talk. Love me some homemade fried shrimp patties on the side with potato salad.

Why wouldn’t they be?

It didn’t take long for a parent to speak up an fix that problem. Lol! Problem solved.

Honestly I don’t know. The 7th and 8th graders were just told to report to the High School with cleats, water, and a mask for conditioning drills.

The only fact you stated was that slavery existed, NOBODY IS DISPUTING THAT! You act like that there hasn’t been a bit of progress in race relations in the last 100 years. Keep on spouting your whoa is me BULLS—T! I am getting all misty eyed. SMH

That’s your rebuttal for me making a TRUE STATEMENT about your mentality. People that think like me invented the robot while you watched and complained about how it was being invented.

Sitting here watching my 7th grade son at his first Football Conditioning Camp for the Junior High an they have them running wind sprints with their mask on! WTH!

It must SUCK to live life imitating a Victim.

Well it’s Day 126 of 15 Days to Flatten the Curve.

Well it’s Day 126 of 15 Days to Flatten the Curve.

If mask work, why did we need lockdowns? If lockdowns work, why did we need mask?

[Hidden Content] You can’t make this up if you tried! 😂😂😂 Sorry but I just noticed the link didn’t abbreviate the name of their coalition.

One of the very few things I watch on tv is sports. It use to be my escape from the daily chaos. Liberals/Democrats have suck the life out of this country like a Parasite with all this PC crap! As for as the young man taking a stand I salute you. Good to see the young man thinking for himself an knowing what the RACIST MARXIST BLM ORGANIZATION STANDS FOR! Let all the little self serving spineless turds kneel. His parents should be PROUD for him standing!

I am happy for the kids to get new facilities and Turf. I know the Vidor kids are enjoying their new Turf. During the summer we’ve been to the high school stadium to get some exercise on the track an there is always kids playing football frisbee, soccer, and football. Of course I didn’t like seeing my taxes go up but in the long run I think it’s going to be more cost effective to maintain for the school district.

The trope of "just shut up and wear a mask" is not science, ordered liberty, or constitutional governance. It's what they do in North Korea. We need real debate on the effectiveness of masks, the type of masks, the situations in which they are worn, the duration of time, the benchmarks that need to be met to measure effectiveness, and the process for promulgating these rules. We are no longer 24 hours into an emergency. We are four months into this virus, and it's time to function like the representative republic that we are. There are numerous political and scientific questions any thinking person should be asking at this point: Why did the CDC, World Health Organization, and such luminaries as Fauci and Surgeon General Jerome Adams so emphatically dismiss the effectiveness of masks, then flip 180 degrees to the point where they shame people who don't wear them, without ever explaining what changed? While we learn more about the virus every day, the micro-biology of the particles hasn't changed, and the premise that non-professional masks worn by non-trained professionals run the risk of counterproductive cross-contamination did not change. The suggestion that this is needed to protect others raises the obvious question: If me not wearing a mask transmits the virus to others who are wearing a mask, then is that not an admission that masks do not work to stop a respiratory virus that is microscopic and gets through the mask? Garbage in, garbage out. It makes no sense to suggest it doesn't penetrate the transmitter's mask from inside-out, especially with the air pressure of a cough or sneeze, but can penetrate the mask of the receiver through suspended molecules that are stagnant without pressure pushing those molecules outside-in to the receiver. If anything, the opposite should be true – it should be more effective for protection of yourself. How can mask-wearing work when everyone just stores them in their pockets to collect bacteria, as our government officials predicted from day one? How could kids ever keep it clean and not collect more bacteria, and where is the evidence that children are even a vector for viral transmission? My home county is mandating that even two-year-olds wear masks. How can anyone suggest that children can keep them clean, and where is the evidence that young children are a vector for transmitting the virus, when numerous studies from other countries have shown the opposite? Mask-wearing in all of the major cities – from Los Angeles to Miami – has been in place and followed by pressure and community shaming for months. Compliance in most of these places has been off the charts, according to the NYT. Yet the virus is still spreading more than before the mandate. The virus is now spreading in Japan, Hong Kong, and the Philippines, which have near universal mask-wearing. At what point does the mask cult have to provide evidence of the effectiveness of these unconstitutional mandates, and at what point do benchmarks have to be met to maintain such a draconian and life-altering requirement? Do masks that are continuously reused, cross-contaminated, and not properly disposed of become a trap to further transmit the virus or become retainers for other pathogens – or at the very least for bacteria, which are larger than viruses – that can harm the mask-wearer and others alike? What are the known side effects to one's health after wearing these masks for hours on end in the heat, especially for children in school? Does long-term mask-wearing lower oxygen levels and compromise our immune systems? Do masks cause people to touch their faces more often, the exact opposite of what was originally the desired result? To this day, there has never been a clinical study with randomized controlled trials in non-health-care settings that vouch for the effectiveness of universal mask-wearing in public. All we have so far are anecdotes and laboratory filtration studies, not real human-to-human studies. When asked about conducting one, Dr. Fauci said there is no intention to do so. In fact, he went from resolutely dismissing the idea of wearing masks in March to now telling a group of Georgetown University students that he couldn't even conduct a study because he was so scared of having even a study group go without masks!