Reagan

Concerning Greenland, Denmark is in violation of their NATO responsibility. They have to be able to defend their territory. They can't defend Greenland with 2 dog sleds!

TDS is a powerful thing. But, when one is a hypocrite one loses all credibility! @Big girl @DCT @UT alum @Boyz N Da Hood What say you about what the video says?

Connect the dots for us between blowing up the drug boats and the oil.

Or maybe the threat of getting blown up has deterred them!

I just heard that ~10% of the federal budget is fraud. Shameful!

I was wondering why I didn't see any blacks at these anti-ICE riots. They learned! @Big girl @UT alum @DCT @Boyz N Da Hood

Keep up the good work!!

Looks good doesn't it! @Big girl @UT alum @DCT

True dat!

Being charged with the KKK Act, now that is fricking hilarious!!

The supremacy of the Feds over State's rights has deep roots. Andrew Jackson prevailed! About 150 years ago (referring to the 1830s, as the Nullification Crisis occurred in 1832–1833 during Andrew Jackson's presidency), Andrew Jackson confronted what was effectively a rebellion—or at least a serious threat of armed resistance—by the state of South Carolina. The event is known as the Nullification Crisis. South Carolina, angry over high federal protective tariffs (especially the "Tariff of Abominations" of 1828 and the adjusted Tariff of 1832) that hurt the Southern economy, passed an Ordinance of Nullification in November 1832. This declared the tariffs unconstitutional and unenforceable within the state after February 1, 1833. The state convention also began military preparations, raising volunteer forces and purchasing arms, while threatening secession if the federal government tried to enforce the tariffs. Jackson viewed this as a direct challenge to federal authority and the Union itself, equating nullification with treason and rebellion. His key actions included: Issuing the famous Proclamation to the People of South Carolina on December 10, 1832, where he strongly denounced nullification as unconstitutional, warned that it led toward disunion, and urged South Carolinians to obey federal law. He described the actions as bringing the state "to the brink of insurrection and treason." Requesting and supporting the Force Bill (passed by Congress in March 1833), which authorized him to use military force—including federal troops and the navy—to collect the tariffs and enforce federal laws if necessary. Jackson prepared for potential conflict by positioning troops, a naval squadron near Charleston, and readying fortifications. Jackson was prepared to use force to crush any rebellion, famously threatening (privately) to hang nullification leaders like his former vice president John C. Calhoun. The crisis was resolved peacefully through compromise: Congress passed the Compromise Tariff of 1833 (brokered by Henry Clay), gradually lowering tariffs to satisfy Southern concerns. South Carolina then repealed its Nullification Ordinance (though it symbolically nullified the Force Bill). This standoff is seen as a major test of federal supremacy over states' rights, and Jackson's firm stance helped preserve the Union—for the time being—while foreshadowing the deeper conflicts that led to the Civil War decades later. In short, Jackson forcefully opposed South Carolina's nullification and threat of rebellion, issued a stern proclamation, prepared for military action, and ultimately backed down the state through a combination of threats and compromise. Minnesota better learn history before they get even more embarrassed than they are now! @Big girl @UT alum @DCT

From the article: "Republicans are now on the investigative prowl and sounding increasingly confident they can find and prove there was an intentional strategy by Democrats to hijack elections and manipulate apportionment in deep blue states like Minnesota. As the magnitude and complexity of Minnesota’s Somali immigrant welfare fraud scandal come into clearer focus, Republicans in Congress are more boldly talking about it being part of a larger scheme by Democrats to use illegal immigrants and purported refugees to hijack federal elections and manipulate apportionment that determines Americans’ congressional representation and federal funding. The Republicans' argument goes like this: Democrats reversed Donald Trump’s related first-term executive orders and ensured that noncitizens, including illegal immigrants, were counted into 2020 U.S. Census. Then-President Biden opened the southern border so that millions of illegals could flood the country in just a few years. Next, liberal nonprofits helped move those migrants from the southern border red states, where they were not particularly welcome, to "sanctuary cities" in Democratic-run cities in the election battleground states and helped them enroll in welfare at the taxpayers' expense. And finally, Democratic leaders, like failed vice-presidential candidate Minnesota Gov. Tom Walz, they say, failed to act — or even worse, looked the other way — when evidence emerged that non-citizens were defrauding those safety net programs by the tune of billions of dollars. And liberal judges blocked efforts to stop or punish the fraud." [Hidden Content]

Every American should love this! @Big girl @UT alum @DCT

So, being pro America makes one a pig? Fascinating!

The Dems have to protect their illegal voters! Think not? Why else would they be doing this?!

True!

LOL!

Greenlanders speak out against Danish rule after decades of forced sterilization, poor living conditions: ‘They stole our future’! Thoughts?! [Hidden Content]

I'm sure the Dems are squirming!

I'm not sure what you are talking about when you are insinuating Trump is gonna take Greenland. He just said he'll not use force. Personally I think he'll make a deal. You know, that's what he does!

ICE Officer Shoots Illegal Alien After Being Ambushed by Accomplices With a Shovel! [Hidden Content]

WOW!

Fascinating! What changed?!