Reagan

WOW!! Wait, let me say it again -- WOW!!!! [Hidden Content]

More confirmation of what we already know! Recusal? – Kash Patel Reveals Stunning Background of DC Judge Chutkan in Cases Against President Trump. From the article: "I was unaware of the detail where Judge Chutkan originally presided over the case when Fusion GPS tried to block Devin Nunes and Kash Patel from revealing the source of the payments for the Chriss Steele dossier. This is a big datapoint. Kash Patel: “Judge Chutkan, for those who don’t know, represented Burisma, Hunter Biden’s fraudulent consulting firm, she was a lawyer at the same law firm with Hunter Biden. But Seb, let’s put that aside. What other matters are there for her recusal? In 2017 when Devin Nunes and I were running the Russiagate investigation, we figured out who paid for the Steele dossier. Fusion GPS, the DNC, and the Hillary Clinton campaign paid Christopher Steele millions of dollars and they laundered it through the FBI and the FISA court to unlawfully surveil Donald Trump. That’s big-time stuff. On the eve of us winning that disclosure, before the world knew, Fusion GPS took us to federal court and that case landed in JUDGE CHUTKAN’S COURT ROOM. … After a month of heavy litigation where Judge Chutkan knew the ins and outs of Fusion GPS, our proceedings, all possible witnesses, etc., when she could not prevent us from prevailing, she recused -on her own- from that case. Why?” “We found out her law firm, Boies Schiller, represented Fusion GPS. The very client that was in front of her in federal court was one of her former clients. That is rule #1 for disqualification.” GORKA: “Boies Schiller Flexner is the same company where Chutkan and Hunter Biden worked!” PATEL: “You gotta ask yourself, Seb, how come it took Chutkan a month [to recuse herself]? … She wanted to block the bank records. (My insertion: Does this sound like "fair" justice?!") Imagine if we never found out who paid for the dossier. … She set the precedent. She cannot neutrally and arbitrarily preside over Donald Trump’s criminal trial when she recused herself from the very representation of the Democratic entrenchment: the DNC, the Hillary Clinton campaign, Fusion GPS, because she was so biased because of her prior representation from Boies Schiller. How could she possibly be allowed to stay on this case? And it wasn’t us, Seb. We got her off because of her own history. That precedent is what Donald Trump’s lawyers must apply this week.” Perhaps this recusal issue is why four other district court judges including Boasberg sat in the back of the courtroom for President Trump’s appearance last week. Perhaps the judges were proactively contemplating who would meet the DC recusal threshold." [Hidden Content] @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker Thoughts?!

From the article: "Republican Matt Gaetz has put forth a bold plan that could blunt the Democratic harassment of former President Donald Trump and expose some of the left’s worst abuses all at the same time. On Tuesday, the Florida congressman challenged his caucus to take action to stymie the constant indictments against Trump, which are little more than election meddling thinly disguised as “justice.” Gaetz wants to call special counsel Jack Smith to account for his actions and to offer Trump immunity by having him testify before Congress as a whistleblower. “This isn’t complicated. If House Republicans take action, Jack Smith could be the first prosecutor to bring a case while under criminal contempt himself. [Attorney General] Merrick Garland could be subject to impeachment if he refuses to enforce that criminal contempt,” he said. “Speaker [Kevin] McCarthy could set up a Select Committee tomorrow, bring President Trump in for testimony, and grant him immunity,” Gaetz concluded." I think this is going to get interesting!! [Hidden Content] New York Times Op-ed Warns of ‘Terrible Consequences’ of Prosecuting Trump! WOW! Looks like even the New York Slimes is getting it!! [Hidden Content]

I heard on a national talk show today that if Mitch McConnell has to resign that the Governor will appoint a Democratic to his seat. One might say, what's the issue? He's a Democrat therefore he appoints a Democratic. Not so fast, kemosabe! The State has a law that states that whatever party the individual that resigns belongs to has to be replaced with same party that resigned. There goes another Democrat giving the middle finger to the rule of law. @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker

Again -- thank you Joebama!

From the article: "President Trump: So now that I have full Subpoena Power because of the Freedom of Speech Sham Indictment by Crooked Joe Biden, Deranged Jack Smith, and the DOJ, it has just been reported that the Unselect January 6th Committee of Political Hacks and Thugs has illegally destroyed their Records and Documents. This is unthinkable, and the Fake Political Indictment against me must be immediately withdrawn. The system is Rigged & Corrupt, very much like the Presidential Election of 2020. We are a Nation in Decline!" [Hidden Content] @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker What say you?!

Are we getting the message that you think JoeBama is sane?!

[Hidden Content]

Prosecutor Working With Jack Smith Donated Thousands to Biden, Cory Booker, the Democratic National Committee! Fair prosecution? I think not! [Hidden Content]

Opinion: Where do you stand on this? Pro or con? [Hidden Content]

I think it was Reagan who said; Our friends on the left aren't apposed to different ideas, it just shocks the hell out of them that there are different ideas!

Normally the lame stream media would be all over this guy. But, they are "amazingly" quite!! [Hidden Content]

ttt

Thank you JoeBama! America's credit rating just got downgraded! Isn't socialism wonderful?! LOL!!!! @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker

Anyone heard of Victoria Nuland? Trump and RFK, Jr mentioned her regarding the deep state and the military industrial complex. Biden also mentioned her. After being videoed threatening Ukraine with a Billion dollars if they don't fire the prosecutor that was looking into the shenanigans at Barisma, he thanked an few people. On of those was Victoria Nuland. V. Nuland was also instrumental in the fake Russian dossier that was bought and paid for by Hillarious Clinton. Does this individual know where the bodies are buried, so to speak? Is this why she has the number 2 spot in the State Department? I wonder how much money she's made off of the Ukraine war?!

Those mean tweets didn't destroy this country like Joebama's actual policies are!

Why Trump Wasn’t Charged With Insurrection? Jack Smith's indictment suggests that his bosses at the White House and the DOJ have a different goal. From the article: "For 31 months, the Democrats and their allies in the corporate media have characterized the Capitol Hill chaos that erupted on Jan. 6, 2021 as an “insurrection.” The House of Representatives reinforced this version of events by impeaching then-President Trump for “incitement of insurrection.” This must have been particularly frustrating for those who have long insisted that the 14th Amendment prohibits Trump from serving a second presidential term. The primary purpose of the 14th Amendment was, of course, to grant citizenship to emancipated slaves. However, it also includes language in Section 3 that bars anyone who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the [United States]” from holding office in the federal government. This passage was included to prevent former officials of the Confederacy from returning to Congress and creating more mischief. The problem with using this clause against Donald Trump is explained by constitutional law professor Josh Blackman in Reason: In some legal circles, advocates contend that it is so obvious that Trump committed insurrection. Yet, the special counsel, after studying the issue for months, opted not to bring that charge. Why? Perhaps Smith determined that he could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in insurrection. Or maybe Smith determined there were considerable legal questions about how to obtain such a conviction – most critically, was there an actual insurrection? (Yes, for the Supreme Court to knock Trump off the ballot, you need five votes to say that there was an insurrection as a matter of law – good luck with that!) It evidently never occurred to the victims of Trump Derangement Syndrome @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker that “insurrection” is a legal term with an actual definition in the U.S. Code. In order to convict former President Trump of this crime, the Special Prosecutor must prove that he fits the following description in 18 U.S.C. § 2383: “Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.” Anyone convicted of insurrection can expect a long prison term and a hefty fine. It would be difficult to convict Trump under this statute, considering that not one participant in the Jan. 6 riot has been charged with insurrection." [Hidden Content]

Silk Road Paved with Cash: Court records confirm millions flowed to Biden family from China. Prosecutor's evidence trail in Hunter Biden case directly contradicts claims made by President for years. [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

Turley Raises Questions About Case Against Trump: Jack Smith ‘Would Need To Bulldoze’ First Amendment To Convict! [Hidden Content] @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker

Dershowitz: Trump Indictment Beginning to ‘Look Like Banana Republic Land’! [Hidden Content] @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker

One can't teach by using only one word! Always glad to help your enlightenment!

Prosecutorial Misconduct – Jack Smith DID NOT Even Download Exculpatory Evidence that Clears Trump Until TWO DAYS AFTER Indictment Dropped! [Hidden Content]

^^^^This^^^^

My friend, there's nothing there. This new clown they got has violated Trump's 1 and 6th Amendment protections. BTW, in the past, he tried to attack anther Republican politician and the Supreme Court "unanimously" threw it out. If this gets to the SC it'll have the same result. The Mueller report? My friend, everything concerning the Russian collusion was a hoax perpetrated by Hillarious Clintionista with "fake" Russian dossier. I hope all this is not new to you. Federal indictments? It's been said you can indict a ham sandwich. Meaning you can always indict even when there's "nothing" there. BTW, in this J6 indictment, the special prosecutor clown left out very important pieces concerning Trump. Like when Trump said to protest "peacefully!" He left that out. This is cause for the clown himself to get indicted. I bet you didn't know you left that part out of the indictment! They've got a nothing burger. Like the lady said in the video, if you would have watched it, she said Trump wants J6 ligated in order to subpoena for 2020 election documents. Like I said before, I don't think the special council wants to go there. But, they've been real stupid so far.