Reagan

Why Trump Wasn’t Charged With Insurrection? Jack Smith's indictment suggests that his bosses at the White House and the DOJ have a different goal. From the article: "For 31 months, the Democrats and their allies in the corporate media have characterized the Capitol Hill chaos that erupted on Jan. 6, 2021 as an “insurrection.” The House of Representatives reinforced this version of events by impeaching then-President Trump for “incitement of insurrection.” This must have been particularly frustrating for those who have long insisted that the 14th Amendment prohibits Trump from serving a second presidential term. The primary purpose of the 14th Amendment was, of course, to grant citizenship to emancipated slaves. However, it also includes language in Section 3 that bars anyone who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the [United States]” from holding office in the federal government. This passage was included to prevent former officials of the Confederacy from returning to Congress and creating more mischief. The problem with using this clause against Donald Trump is explained by constitutional law professor Josh Blackman in Reason: In some legal circles, advocates contend that it is so obvious that Trump committed insurrection. Yet, the special counsel, after studying the issue for months, opted not to bring that charge. Why? Perhaps Smith determined that he could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in insurrection. Or maybe Smith determined there were considerable legal questions about how to obtain such a conviction – most critically, was there an actual insurrection? (Yes, for the Supreme Court to knock Trump off the ballot, you need five votes to say that there was an insurrection as a matter of law – good luck with that!) It evidently never occurred to the victims of Trump Derangement Syndrome @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker that “insurrection” is a legal term with an actual definition in the U.S. Code. In order to convict former President Trump of this crime, the Special Prosecutor must prove that he fits the following description in 18 U.S.C. § 2383: “Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.” Anyone convicted of insurrection can expect a long prison term and a hefty fine. It would be difficult to convict Trump under this statute, considering that not one participant in the Jan. 6 riot has been charged with insurrection." [Hidden Content]

Silk Road Paved with Cash: Court records confirm millions flowed to Biden family from China. Prosecutor's evidence trail in Hunter Biden case directly contradicts claims made by President for years. [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

Turley Raises Questions About Case Against Trump: Jack Smith ‘Would Need To Bulldoze’ First Amendment To Convict! [Hidden Content] @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker

Dershowitz: Trump Indictment Beginning to ‘Look Like Banana Republic Land’! [Hidden Content] @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker

One can't teach by using only one word! Always glad to help your enlightenment!

Prosecutorial Misconduct – Jack Smith DID NOT Even Download Exculpatory Evidence that Clears Trump Until TWO DAYS AFTER Indictment Dropped! [Hidden Content]

^^^^This^^^^

My friend, there's nothing there. This new clown they got has violated Trump's 1 and 6th Amendment protections. BTW, in the past, he tried to attack anther Republican politician and the Supreme Court "unanimously" threw it out. If this gets to the SC it'll have the same result. The Mueller report? My friend, everything concerning the Russian collusion was a hoax perpetrated by Hillarious Clintionista with "fake" Russian dossier. I hope all this is not new to you. Federal indictments? It's been said you can indict a ham sandwich. Meaning you can always indict even when there's "nothing" there. BTW, in this J6 indictment, the special prosecutor clown left out very important pieces concerning Trump. Like when Trump said to protest "peacefully!" He left that out. This is cause for the clown himself to get indicted. I bet you didn't know you left that part out of the indictment! They've got a nothing burger. Like the lady said in the video, if you would have watched it, she said Trump wants J6 ligated in order to subpoena for 2020 election documents. Like I said before, I don't think the special council wants to go there. But, they've been real stupid so far.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't there two other "JS's" also on the staff.

Uh, no there is not. Speech that someone disagrees with is not obstruction of justice. Or do you have a problem with the 1st Amendment?

So, did you listen to the clip or not? OK, I'll bite, where did you get your info that she's not member of a DOD Task Force?

Curious: The Nederland HC, where all has he coached?

I have thought about this for a long time. Just think about it!

Another good Ad!

@Big girl @UT alum This is your bunch!

How the DoD & Trump Has All the Goods on the 2020 Election! Interesting learning about this Treaty she talked: [Hidden Content] @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker

Trump Lawyer Bobb: Jack Smith's New Indictment Empowers Trump Legal Team to Get J6 Answers. If this goes to trial, like I've said before, this will open Trump's team for discovery. Everything concerning J6 is on the table. Dose the anti-Trump side really want this?! Since this is all for show, just like the J6 committee meetings were, I doubt they want this to happen! [Hidden Content]

Politics are played everywhere. Doesn’t mean she’s not biased!

Just admit it, you didn't watch the video!

Chutkan donated $1,500 to Barack Obama's campaign between 2008 and 2009! Yeah, she's not biased. LOL! Yobama also appointed her husband as a Judge. Yobama appointed people to do his bidding, NOT to follow the law. Check the 2 on the Supreme Court. Plus this recent one has Yobama's finger prints all over it!

So -- that wasn't an actual video of one of Trump's lawyers?

Watch–Trump Attorney: ‘Not a Coincidence’ Charges Filed Against Trump Evidence of Corruption Emerges: ‘Election Interference’! [Hidden Content]

LOL! I thought this was going to be another Toby joke!