Reagan

Big girl, apparently you didn't listen to him actually saying this with the youtube video I provided. It's hard to convince me when I hear someone say "orange", then come back and tell me they actually meant "purple!" BTW -- snopes has been wrong before!

I made that statement because that is who you mentioned. He's not the only one. But, the status that he has earned, there are few tenants in that club. History of State Championship coaches. Top 6: 9 **Scott Surratt9 Gordon Wood8 **Tim Buchanan8 G.A. Moore, Jr.7 Todd Dodge5 **Gary Joseph

I think that's a fair assessment.

He was an assistant at Texas High. Was not a HC prior to Carthage. So, Carthage didn't really know what they were getting. Until...

Looks like Carthage has a good coach that can develop his players into what he needs to win Titles.

Again, my top pick would be Delege. I was going to mention Clayton as being good, but that name has already been brought up. Some of these names, though, are going to have to be measured by a different yard stick. Clayton, for instance, ran the Veer, if I'm not mistaken. At Nederland it was a more of a run oriented offense. But still, he was a good captain of the ship. I think Fernandez and Dustin Hood did a good job. Now, again if I'm not mistaken, Spell, Barrow and Robbins all had decent throwing yards. But again, there's a caveat. The last three didn't have decent win records to go along with all those yards. So, I'd surmise that being in a constant losing situation they had to throw a lot because they were behind. Again, just my opinion.

There's two situations here: 1) I believe a President must declassify documents while in office. I think this is obvious. 2) I think the "how" it can be done is universally thought to be ambiguous. It is my understanding that Reagan declassified documents, or a document, while giving a speech. So... @CardinalBacker

1) What makes this a hard stance? 2) With the right coach Nederland can compete with anyone!

He didn't actually say this, did he? Huh -- yes he did!! @UT alum @Big girl @DonTheCon2024 @Bobcat1 @CardinalBacker

I sent Happy Birthday wishes to President Trump in ya'lls honor! @UT alum @CardinalBacker @DonTheCon2024

No, not true. If facts lead to criminal activities, then so be it. But, 4 years of attacks against Trump like Russia collusion with fake Russian dossiers has all been proven false. BTW, I have heard that Hillarious Clinton told obama and biden she was going to push the Russian hoax. So, again, nothings been true so far concerning Trump. So why should we start believing now that's he's done something wrong?!

Trump rises in polls following indictment charges! the other side just doesn't get it. The American people get that this is a con game. Plus the more they attack Trump the more he gets free campaign publicity!

As I'm still trying to figure this out. I'll give a little insight into what I've learned so far: In this whole situation something didn't make sense. Clinton, Bush and Obama was able to take documents, Clinton also took audio recordings, once they left the Oval Office. Why they are able to do this has to do a lawsuit filed against Clinton, known as the "sock case", concerning this and he won the case. And the judge stated he won because of the Presidential Records Act. It also may have to do if it's classified and unclassified. Still looking into that one. Presidents, and only Presidents can declassify what they want. I think the judge said as much because the President IS the Executive Branch. Biden took documents which was highly illegal. VP's can't declassify anything. Anyway, I believe this is the reason why the Presidential Records Act is never mentioned. Because they can't. So, what did they do, they brought up the Espionage Act of 1917. Oh, BTW, no President or VP as ever been indicted using this act. As Breitbart has stated: 'that the Espionage Act of 1917, which Trump is accused of violating, was not intended to apply to presidents. If it had been, then every president who took documents with him before the passage of the PRA in 1978 could have been prosecuted for “espionage.” Trump also noted that the indictment failed to deal with the PRA itself, and he claimed that the Mar-a-Lago raid violated his Fourth Amendment rights to be free from “unreasonable searches and seizures” — seizures that included his personal passport. So, any actual violation of the Presidential Records Act is a civil situation. The Espionage At is a federal law. So, Biden, after saying he knows nothing about what's going on, had to sign the paper moving this from civil to federal. Again -- Biden lies! There's much more to be learned here. More info coming later!

[Hidden Content]

What policies did you object to while he was President?

Trump Atty Alina Habba: 'Prosecuting A Political Opponent Is What Cuba & Venezuela Does, Not the US'! [Hidden Content]

I just heard that the damning 1023 form against Joebama that the FBI finally showed Congress, the FBI “redacted” the information concerning the recorded conversations implicating Joebama in the bribery scheme.

Isn’t FOIA only for government entities? I don’t think it is valid for private individuals. We have the 4th Amendment that protects us from this. PS, everything that Trump has has been declassified. Trump and his lawyers are not that stupid. AGAIN, nothings been true so far concerning the other side’s attacks against Trump. SO — why would any reasonable person think this would be any different?!

Trump’s Legal Team Prepares to File Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith’s Case Citing Prosecutorial Misconduct! From the article: "Trump’s lawyers will ask Judge Aileen Cannon to unseal Obama-appointed Judge Beryl Howell’s order obliterating Trump’s attorney-client privilege with his lawyer Eric Corcoran. Via RealClearInvestigations reporter Paul Sperry: Insiders say Trump’s new legal team preparing to file motion to dismiss case citing prosecutorial misconduct & will ask Judge Cannon to unseal Obama-appointed Judge Howell’s order breaching attorney-client privilege b/t Corcoran and Trump and declare notes inadmissable. Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, was first assigned to oversee Jack Smith’s classified documents case and January 6 case against Trump. Judge Beryl Howell ruled against Trump at every turn! In fact, Judge Howell previously ordered Trump’s lawyer Evan Corcoran to testify before a grand jury in special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago. Judge Howell flipped Trump’s own lawyer Eric Corcoran into a witness when she obliterated Trump’s attorney client privilege in a ruling. Howell ruled DOJ prosecutors ‘met the threshold for the crime-fraud exception’ for Trump’s attorney. Jack Smith used Eric Corcoran’s notes against Trump. According to the indictment reviewed by The Gateway Pundit, Jack Smith used notes memorialized by Trump’s lawyer against the former president. Trump’s privileged conversations with his lawyer about the boxes of documents stored at Mar-a-Lago was used to charge Trump with conspiracy to obstruct (count 32), withholding a document or record (count 33), corruptly concealing a document or record (count 34) and false statements (count 37). [Hidden Content]

I’m still here taking it all in. You’ll get a response. There’s more to this than meets the eye.

President Trump was well within his rights to do what he did Under the "Presidential Records Act." He said it's funny in the indictment the Feds never mention this act! Imagine that! Clinton, Bush and Yobama did the same thing. NOTHING they've done to Trump has been true. So, I guess, why start now?! Oh, BTW, the classified papers that JoeBama has, he got them while he was VP which is highly illegal!

People's sense of history sometimes starts when they are born. One has brought up the QB of the '57 team. When the discussion about QB's started, that time frame, IMO, never entered the picture. But, going back to day one of Nederland to judge the best QB is fair. But a lot of studying would have to be done. Anyway, probably the best QB Nederland has had was William Delege. Good passer and good leader. Again, my opinion.