Jump to content

Reagan

Members
  • Posts

    12,732
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Reagan

  1. The Supreme Court didn't say anything about it be seditious! They said it didn't have standing. There's no doubt Pennsylvania broke Constitutional laws.
  2. Art Briles! 😉😀
  3. Don't you know the election time frame means nothing if fraud is involved?!
  4. One salient question: Are you saying the chinese are not buying land in Texas?!
  5. BigGirl, UTalum, Dove -- what say you?! [Hidden Content]
  6. We may need to keep an eye on this! [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]
  7. Good point!
  8. Was Hightower that good or Memorial's district that bad?
  9. Explain! Better athletes and/or out coached?
  10. Realville, my friend, don't fret. The Justices didn't decide on ANY of the 4 state's illegal activities. Nothing concerning the fraud or the obvious Constitutional violations. What they said was: Texas does not have the standing/authority to be concerned about what another state do with their elections. That's it! There is no doubt in my mind that law suits that are out there concerning the fraud that we are concerned about will end up before the Supreme Court. And I'm sure the Justices realize this. And I feel strongly that when presented with all the fraud evidence that they will rule in Trump's favor. As for as the Constitutional violations of the 4 states, once all this has been settled, the GOP within these states are going to have to file the law suits that could eventually be brought before the Supreme Court. Keep the faith. The devils will not prevail!
  11. Why no comment from you or BigGirl about this video?!
  12. I trust these conservative justices. We know there was massive fraud. They were not going to debate this aspect of it anyway. Apparently they are saying this is not the way that this needs to be resolved. I think everybody knew it was a long shot. Again -- the fraud is still there!
  13. [Hidden Content]
  14. LOL!! [Hidden Content]
  15. I'm not sure what your point is in relation to the point I was making. Anyway -- you don't see the irony in Pennsylvania joining in on a lawsuit against itself when it concerns Constitutional election violations?!
  16. It must be pretty bad In Pennsylvania when Pennsylvania joins Texas in suing itself! Lawd have mercy! LOL!!
  17. I wonder why they think they have to be in a hurry. This usually brings bad results. Like I said before, wait until the playoffs are over. Then you look at existing head coaches. Next you look at top assistants. But, again, the second is a crap shoot. Just like when Ethridge left PNG, his top notch assistant didn't fare too well.
  18. Let me educate on the difference: The difference is is that what Texas is doing, they do not need to prove any fraud. This case goes directly to the Supreme Court. This is strictly a Constitutional violation question. The only ones at the state level that can make election rules and laws are the LEGISLATURES!! In these states, the Governor, the Secretary of State and the state Supreme Courts were making/changing rules that 100% violates the U.S Constitution. So, with that being said, true, the Supreme Court does not have to take this. BUT -- if they do, then there's no doubt that laws were broken by these 4-5 states and Trump will win. I know you won't hear this info on CNN. Do your homework and prove me wrong!
  19. [Hidden Content]
  20. 1) Hire from outside 2) Wait until the playoffs are over.
  21. More WOW!! [Hidden Content]
  22. [Hidden Content]
×
×
  • Create New...