From the article: "Ford’s lawyers tell Grassley that they will provide her therapy notes, polygraph data to the FBI once she is interviewed (that hasn’t happened as of now). Worth remembering that for all the talk of the FBI’s supplemental background check, the Constitution confers authority to advise and consent on the Senate and only the Senate. Refusal to provide info to the committee is striking. She had over two weeks to provide them to the Senate which, in this case, has more investigative jurisdiction than the FBI does. She could have presented them during open testimony as corroborating evidence. She didn’t. Grassley response: “It’s disappointing that Dr. Ford’s attorneys were willing to share evidence with The Washington Post many weeks ago but to this day refuse to share the same evidence, which Dr. Ford relied on in her testimony, with the Senate.” This is a game. It’s time to end it." In other words, SHE PUT CONDITIONS on providing evidence that Ford herself claimed would help prove her own case. What possible reason could there be for that, UNLESS the therapy notes contradicted her story or were in fact helpful to prove Kavanaugh’s innocence?
[Hidden Content]