So since “rules” get set by speeches, should I pull out some of President Trump’s finer speeches (since speeches based on Pubic logic create rules and “precedents.”). I mean, if a single Senator can create a rule and precedent, I guess an actual President can create a super-rule or even a lifestyle, way of thinking, or general principle that should be applied to him, his party, and most certainly anyone who has supported him. Would that upset any of you??? Don’t answer. The answer must be on this board a thousand times
LOL! It's always fun to throw back in the face of what liberals say as they run around high-fiving each other while saying it. But, more importantly, there's nothing in obama's past choices for judges that would give any reason that the one in question was a strict Constitutionalist. Knowing obama's contempt for the Constitution, he didn't select judges with that criteria in mind. Kagan, Sotomayor are jokes. They make decisions in lock-step with what obama wanted and now doing the bidding for whatever the socialist, Anti-Amercan agenda calls for. The two clowns, Watson and Chuang, that voted to block Trump's immigration policy had no concern of what the law actually says. Everyone knows the President has this authority. But, again, that's not why they were chosen. I believe I put an article on this forum about obama being involved in filing these lawsuits against Trump. Then they go judge shopping. They go to ones he appoints because he knows what the outcome will be. Again -- he should, that's why he put them there. So, again, the salient point is, the judge in question would not been good for America.