Reagan

From the article: " “If they believe this man is predatory, they are guilty of allowing him to exist for 40 years,” Henry said. “I think someone should prosecute and go after them. You can’t be a victim 40 years later, in my opinion.” " [Hidden Content]

The Washington Compost wrote this story. They have endorsed Moore's opponent. This event supposedly happen 38 years ago. Why are we just now hearing about it?

Sure is funny how this just came up. This is Nov. 9th and the election is Dec 12. Awful fishy! But, there's two aspects to this story. I'll comment later as I check further.

[Hidden Content]

Dem Rep doesn't see a problem with their stance! [Hidden Content]

35 - 17 Nederland!

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

1956 A 5MB hard drive being loaded onto a Pan Am plane.

Eat zoo animals! [Hidden Content]

The Texas hero who stopped this thug was an NRA instructor. [Hidden Content]

A "government" screw up allowed this to happen. There are those that say government is the answer to all problems! [Hidden Content]

They have the talent. It may be time for a coaching change. You are right, they should have competed for the State Title last year. And possibly this year with the running back they have. That's one of the problems with the Spread offense. When you have a potential All-State running back and you don't give him the ball 80% of the time with a lead blocker, well...

[Hidden Content]

Texas Rangers: Armed citizen "engaged" killer, ending rampage!

Very sad! Prayers go to the families!

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

So since “rules” get set by speeches, should I pull out some of President Trump’s finer speeches (since speeches based on Pubic logic create rules and “precedents.”). I mean, if a single Senator can create a rule and precedent, I guess an actual President can create a super-rule or even a lifestyle, way of thinking, or general principle that should be applied to him, his party, and most certainly anyone who has supported him. Would that upset any of you??? Don’t answer. The answer must be on this board a thousand times LOL! It's always fun to throw back in the face of what liberals say as they run around high-fiving each other while saying it. But, more importantly, there's nothing in obama's past choices for judges that would give any reason that the one in question was a strict Constitutionalist. Knowing obama's contempt for the Constitution, he didn't select judges with that criteria in mind. Kagan, Sotomayor are jokes. They make decisions in lock-step with what obama wanted and now doing the bidding for whatever the socialist, Anti-Amercan agenda calls for. The two clowns, Watson and Chuang, that voted to block Trump's immigration policy had no concern of what the law actually says. Everyone knows the President has this authority. But, again, that's not why they were chosen. I believe I put an article on this forum about obama being involved in filing these lawsuits against Trump. Then they go judge shopping. They go to ones he appoints because he knows what the outcome will be. Again -- he should, that's why he put them there. So, again, the salient point is, the judge in question would not been good for America.

One shouldn't get upset when one set the rules (The Biden Rule) and then when we play by them one get upset.

Man -- this hits the nail right on the head!

Just to clarify: you said Republicans set the standard. Again -- it was actually Biden. You of your guys!