Englebert

You have a strange little mind. The selective outrage is fascinating, and comical. The lack of shame is just indescribable.

If you can't figure out "what your dealing with" by the posts, then you have a whole other issue that you need to deal with on a personal level. And if you need personal information to debate, well, you can't debate. The topic is obvious, and it's obvious you want to use the personal information for personal attacks. Looney Liberals have been employing this strategy for awhile now. It's pretty clear you are in need of the obligatory pat on the head with the mutterance "bless your little heart".

That's what stupid people say when encountering something beyond their comprehension. I bet you've employed the old standard "but he's book smart" defense mechanism on multiple occasions haven't you.

You need to look up the definition of deflecting. You are the one that "deflected" by asking Baddog where he worked. That has nothing to do with the debate, but your feeble mind is so confused right now all you can do is try to go on the offensive of personal attacks. It's an old worn out strategy that most people just laugh off and mutter "bless his little heart", but I will drop down into the gutter with you. Since I've been employing the Liberal strategy of debate, "that's just my game". Pick a topic and start a new thread.

Why you are asking personal questions instead of staying on topic. It is a very simple concept that only Liberals have such trouble understanding.

My bad, I didn't realize my post was beyond your comprehension. Try reading it a few more times, and if you are still having trouble I will try to dumb it down. But you have to make an effort.

That's the true sign of a Liberal that's lost it. You are trying to gather information for personal attacks when you realize you can't debate on facts. This is just so sad.

Response to what? Put down the vodka! (And yes, that is an exclamation point purposely added.)

Important enough that Harry Reid, you know, the former Senate Majority leader, went after the name using his bully pulpit with threatening consequences. It is hilarious that the Supreme Court, with four very Liberal judges, shot down the Patent Office's, with Harry Reid's full support, unbelievable facists attempt to dictact their insanely skewed and sanctimonious Liberal agenda on the American people. Even the Liberal judges had to shoot down the former Senate Majority leader and his ilk with a score of 8-0 unanimous decision. Speaking of Reid's ilk, it looks like there's room for one more.

This coming from someone who put stock in polls and now wants to deflect by saying different polls have different results. Just stop. The laughter can't be controlled much longer. You are rapidly sliding into the looney, safe space, Play-doh, coloring book mentality.

I don't know. Why did Obama try to ban FoxNews from his briefings? Why did Obama spy on AP reporters, and spy on FoxNews' James Rosen and his family? You didn't seem outraged about that, but you seem to be impersonating a looney Liberal by getting all huffy-puffy about something that is not even close to what you should have been livid about. In your own words...just stop already. You are starting to show your true colors, which is actually coming as a big surprise to me.

Does that poll still have Hillary leading by double-digit figures? (I know, I know, I've used that line before, but it so dang-gum appropriate.)

I would love for Greg Abbott, or anyone really, to tell the NFL to shove their bid where the sun don't shine, then go to a state where they can choose what bathroom to use in order to remove it.

Same thing happened to me.

With absolutely no shame in showing it.

But way, way more intelligent than you. So where does that leave you on the intelligence scale? And it was predictable you would have no comment on the topic. Do you feel like a man when you throw out insults about someone that is your superior in every way? Is it due to some form of inferiority complex?

Rick Perry is skeptical about how much impact Man has on Global Warming theory. Finally, an adult in the room. Here's an article, though it is not worth reading: [Hidden Content]

I would vote no on the Bill. The reason, and I would shout it from the rooftops, is that I don't feel Congressmen should be carving out special privileges for themselves. We have enough of that already. If they feel a gun will protect them, then that logic should extend to the common people also. What's good for the goose... I think everyone should be afforded their 2nd amendment rights, not just a privileged few, therefore the Bill should allow everyone to carry guns.

It would have to compete with the 24 hour comedy network that is MSNBC. The childish, immature behaviors and emotional meltdowns are hilarious.

We've already found the true liars, and it isn't Trump or his administration.

That article was written by a clueless liar. And you fell for it. Most people would be ashamed at themselves for being that gullible.

The media unloaded on Sarah Palin for having an illustration that contained crosshairs. The sentiment of the illustration was the "targeting" of many Democrat congressional districts, one of which was Gifford's district. Many, not a few, many Liberal pundits considered this causal actions of the shooting on the part of Palin, and some were actually calling for her arrest. It's was really ironic when FoxNews and some other sane outlets posted these same type of pictures with crosshairs that were created by Democrats. This didn't stop the full on assault of Palin and her inciteful rhetoric. The double standards are clear and obvious for anyone with at least two functioning brain cells.

What congressional or government job should Newt Gingrich retire from? Add that to the long list of your lies that far exceeds Trumps misstatements. You lie on a daily basis. I know it's not really a lie, but you previously posted a link that attributed a list of misstatements by Trump that were classified as lies. If you are going to use that standard, you must admit that you are a habitual liar.

Is a background check for the purpose of identification? People will say that it aides in investigations, but is that the purpose of background checks? Isn't the whole purpose to determine who is qualified to own a gun? If you say that it's to help in identification then we might as well have a full blown gun registration.

No he didn't. That is just what your Liberal leaders are feeding you, and it makes you look like a complete fool. MSNBC has done some kind of number on you. If you want to debate what Trump actually said, then let's go. But you will run and hide only to spout your hateful rhetoric at a later date. Name one person that believes most Muslims are terrorists. (Ooops, caught you in another lie.) Why would Trump focus on White nationalists? Just because the Liberal nut-cases tell you to hate White people, doesn't mean sane people should give any credence to such non-sense. Again, your Liberal leaders are making you look like a fool.