Englebert

Only a short-sighted imbecile full of hate and self-delusions of moral superiority would make a statement like that. And I bet you believe ISIS is the JV who just needs a hug and a job. -Donald J. Trump

Who is the idiot? You can't give examples of idiotic behavior, but somehow feel you're intellectually superior. Please give some policy examples that you feel deem Trump an idiot. We can then debate on your analytical skills and come to a consensus on the true idiot.

At least he is not distorting facts and all sense of reality to form that opinion. Can't say that for everyone. And I bet BS Wildcats would even defend his opinion. Again, can't say that for everyone. And why did you preface your statement with "Get over yourself!"? Is that your distorted heightened intellectual superiority and self-awareness debilitation seeping out again.

Please enlighten us with a detailed description of why you think Trump is the impetus for the hateful environment. You analytical skills and view of reality are a sight to behold. Please grace us with your morally superior intelligence. Everyone with two functioning brain cells can see the hate coming from the Liberals, but somehow you manage to distort that to actually blame the Republicans. Please teach us how you can do that. I would love to live a life in which I can just blame all of my problems on someone else and distort facts to maintain a heightened sense of morally and superiority. I'm guessing the key is to harbor as much hate as possible, then use the distorted facts as a defense mechanism to mask that hate.

That is a complete lie. When Gabby Giffords was shot the Liberal MSM blamed the Republicans, especially Sarah Palin. You have a very short and peculiar memory. How you can distort facts just to keep your preconceived notions intact is baffling. It would be one thing if you just distorted facts, but you distort the facts into blaming people you don't like. Nobody was acting like Giffords did something wrong and got what she deserved. That is just the hate oozing from you pours, distorting your brain. Makes us wonder what part of your body you pull "facts" from.

How long do you think it will be before you start reading about terrorism in the local newspapers? And I curious at to how you can read a newspaper with your head buried in the sand. Now that is some feat.

Is that you Big Girl? I never expected a more mature answer. History is just repeating itself. But somehow you will return with a condescending and morally superior attitude after posting all of these childish and immature posts. Tell us again how racist and incompassionate we are, and how we hate the poor and want to see them die in the street. These analytical deductions are coming from someone who can only muster a "smmfh" response. And somehow we are the idiots.

I like the fact that it will soon be a thing of the past. Why do you preface your posts by laughing at people then proceed to write sentences that are laughable? Be honest.

I'm fairly certain it's poor you if you put any stock in polls. How did that poll fair during the elections? Is Hillary still currently leading Trump by 10pts in your poll?

The former regime lied more, but you gave them a pass. It is because of the political affiliation or the skin color, or both?

I don't know? Is a 10pt lead going into election day good?

You started this by saying we didn't know what the article was saying, prefaced with a LOL. I asked you to clarify what we missed, and you failed miserably. I can only assume you are employing the Liberal tactic of deflection instead of contrition. That's the lesser used tactic of Liberals when self-grandiose positions come crashing down. Normally it is personal attacks.

I read the first paragraph, and part of the second, but will go no further. The holier than thou attitude expressed on his own flawed premise leads me to believe no further reading is necessary. If there is a salient point in this post that you would like to discuss, I will go back and read it (although it might be hard to concentrate over the laughter). But I'm sure you will forego any discussion and run from this article.

That article is worse than westend1's link. Do Liberals have a contest to see who can write the most imbecilic posts? Just like in the post westend1 linked to, the author is showing his lack of intelligence by trying to point out someone else's lack of intelligence. And y'all have the audacity to spread the stupidity. And as always, I will back up my contentions in a discussion about this article with you, but as history has shown you will run and hide as fast as you can.

Like the poll you posted. Is Hillary still up 10pts in your poll?

So what is your question? Why is an article posted about climate change on Mars under the title "Mars is going through climate change"...is that really your question?

Yes, the connection is both planets have naturally occurring climate change. You are the one that needs to stop trying to ridicule people that are pointing out that simple concept. Your are interjecting things not said...things that reside in your head and projected onto the rest of us. That's what deserves the LOL.

It's impossible or incredibly difficult to pin it on Obama since Obama sealed the Fast And Furious documents using executive privilege...similar to firing the prosecuting attorney. Where was the outrage then?

The evidence the author uses to conclude that Trump is stupid shows his incredible bias, and frankly his own stupidity. One viewing of "The Big Bang Theory" illustrates that incredibly smart people, geniuses, are subject to hilarious faux pas and naivety on many subjects. To focus on these as evidence of Trump's incompetency as president leads me to conclude I never want to read another article from that incompetent author.

Where did someone do that? I certainly did not. The contention was that Mars' climate is changing, but Man is not present. The moral being that climate changes naturally, and is not necessitated on Man's involvement, contrary to what the religion of Climate Change nut-cases are demanding us believe...without any proof.

What are you basing your opinion on? Could it be "D" or "R"?

How's that tin foil hat fit on your head. Do you have it straight or askew? And when you calm down from your searing hatred of White people, please provide some evidence of your wild theory. I would love nothing better than to discuss why you have come to this conclusion, and would love for you to back up your statements. When you make the statement "that is what they want to believe", I have no problem calling you a bigot and scourge on society that lets racism fester in an otherwise civil society. If you want to speculate on why racism won't die, you just provided the prime example.

Thank you for acknowledging that Republicans look at policies versus skin color. What's sad is I highly doubt you even realize your admittance.

For some reason I expect a little more out of people who throw out unsubstantiated and blatantly false accusations, runs and hides when called out...only to return spouting the same old shameful rhetoric full of hate. I do like the cat quips and the kindergarten one-liner insults...makes me think of the good old days when the biggest worry in the world was what was for dinner.

He always does. I think we should call Guiness Book of World Records because he must be well over 100 years old. All of his racial topics are from that long ago. His mind must have started failing him in the sixties because he doesn't seem to recall the United States passing Civil Rights laws, creating Affirmation Action laws, spending trillions of dollars on social welfare programs aimed specifically to minorities, establishing Minority Outreach programs in practically every sector of society (public and private), etc.