Englebert

Wow, that is just down right laughable. For the last 8 years we've had a Napoleon wannabe...spying on journalists and their families, especially ones he didn't like, spying on presidential campaigns, spying on every American in general, directing the I.R.S. to target certain people/groups, attempting to control every American's healthcare, ignoring foreign countries hacking into American public and private sectors, including every military branch, disparaging our policemen, providing a slush fund for Democrat causes by weaponizing the EPA, filling our courts with unbelievably biased and partisan judges, ignoring Federal laws, especially ones regarding illegal immigration, circumventing Congress' authority through executive actions, closing Federal parks in a hissie fit because he was denied running the country into even deeper debt, invoking executive privileged over documents that could show wrongdoing in the death of an American enforcement officer...there is so much more material, but I'm strained to the point of breaking just thinking about that wannabe dictator. And you have the nerve to call Trump a dictator after watching Obama's antics. That's just pathetic.

Would you care to discuss in detail any of the links you posted? Or did you just try to employ the "jab and run" tactic? It's obvious the only "debating" you will engage in is unfounded personal attacks. I'm starting to get the impression, based on your unabashed obsession with Trump, that you have is poster tacked on your ceiling right between Hannity and Rush.

This one is hilarious. Short on facts, long on entertainment.

The first 3 "lies" they listed were lies by the author. I couldn't continue reading. Where do you find this stuff? Better yet, do you actually think these are worthy of a link in your post? What does this say about you?

Really? Politifact? That's not even trying.

Another epic fail, but keep trying.

At least you tried. Failed miserably, but at least you tried.

Third graders everywhere have been missing your classic posts. They were saddened by the fact that you stopped posting your childish and hateful rants for a while, but you redeemed yourself with this one. The third graders appreciate the fact that they can now laugh again. Long live the king.

Why do you call him a dictator? Please explain yourself. We can only hope, but history has shown you will again run and hide, only to spout your unsubstantiated and hateful rhetoric at a later date. And the laughter continues. I'm not a fan of Trump, but I'll give him one thing...he sure has the uncanny ability to allow Liberals to show their true colors as the party of hate.

And again you are so wrong. Hate comes from the fact that you attack Trump as immoral, unscrupulous, and evil without any facts. There is a huge difference between us. You can try the old "tried and true" Liberal tactic of personal attacks, but I can respond in kind. The overused Liberal tactic of trying to attach a generalized label on someone with no basis is just childish. But you keep trying, the more you open your mouth the better understanding we have of your hateful underpinnings. So let's discuss the "illegal" term that you left off and flippantly disregarded . If I go into your house uninvited, according to your definition that is perfectly acceptable. According to the law that is illegal. There is a huge difference between guest and intruder. Would you call the police or would you let me just make myself at home and raid your refrigerator? And how would you feel if you called the police, and their response was "If he hasn't committed any other crime, then we are not interested in pursuing this matter." Now if you called the police, does that mean I can call you a bigot, or a racist, or a deplorable, or evil? Attacking someone as evil for attempting to enforce the laws already on the books, then trying to pin an unjustifiable negative pejorative on that person, is a sure sign of hate. Would you care to respond?

Wow, so much hate with little to no evidence to support that hate. Why did you conveniently forget to include the word "illegal" when you stated "his insistence that immigrants be locked out and deported"? Is it because it just blows your whole narrative sky high? I would ask you to comment on various other parts of this rant, but let's just stick to this one first.

Florida punches the last College World Series ticket...3-0 win in Game 3 over Wake Forest.

I read the first two paragraphs, but couldn't finish due to my uncontrollable laughter. Do you really read this stuff? Did you read anything but the headline? And if you did read it, would you like to discuss any or all parts of this propagandized article? Even Politifact would have to rate this a "pants on fire" article and they're on the same side.

Wake Forest with a walk-off homer in the 11th, win 8-6 to tie series at 1 game apiece. The If game to follow.

We all know the Russians only meddle in elections in which Republicans win. And as far as counting the success rate, I think Putin is kicking Obama's butt. Obama meddled in the Israeli elections and lost. He also meddled in the Brexit vote and lost. I really don't know of any election he meddled in that went his way. I know he meddled in the French elections, but I didn't pay enough attention to which way that one went.

Are you assuming a British persona now? Obama might have won, but the country lost. (Although I don't think McCain or Romney would have made a good president, either would have been much better than what we got.)

I'm curious as to how you think your interpretation skills are so in tune with Trump. Past history has shown this to be completely false, but you still won't deviate from your fantasyland. And the most hilarious part is you are obsessed about this, but give Bill Clinton a complete pass for doing much worse. I guess in your family morals are defined by political affiliation.

I'm curious, are you implying that somehow we ran people off? If that assumption is true, how do you think that feat was accomplished? I really hope you are not trying to throw out the victimhood card for those that decided to quit participating in this forum.

Why do you feel you are qualified to make that assessment?

So what you are saying is that the New York Times blatantly lied, then when caught said "oops, my bad...we will retract our lie". They "clarified" nothing.

I'm thinking that even the Liberals have now come to the conclusion that Obama was the worst President in U.S. history...well, most of them are at least admitting he was terrible.

Why? Please explain the policy differences between the two that leads you to this proclamation. I would love to hear your rationale for longing for a (barely) Conservative over someone more on the Liberal side. I anxiously await your thoughtful insight. (Call the Guiness Book Of World Records, I just set a record for the most sarcastic post of all time.)

If 9 out of 10 posters on this site are so biased and racists, why don't you call us/them out when you witness these transgressions? I have never seen you offer a legitimate counterpoint to anything posted in this forum. All you deliver is attempts to obfuscate and off-topic subject changes. Considering you won't debate but complain profusely, does this mean you are incapable of debate, or just the spitting image of the person you described in stevenash's post?

Yes, he will think of something corresponding with the time his Liberal leaders unleash the next set of talking points.

What makes you feel capable of determining my qualifications? What are your qualifications that give you this uncanny ability? And I would love to hear your rationale as to why you feel I couldn't be honest enough to be included in this list. Please, explain what leads you to believe this, and why. I'm particularly interested to hear your rationale for not including yourself. Are you readily admitting that you cannot be honest with yourself enough to be trusted to be honest with the rest of us?