Englebert

No, you are running. History has proven that is your style. And I don't have to go back 50+ years to find evidence.

Name one of the Republicans complaining that would have preferred Hillary as president...or Obama. I bet you can't. Republicans are not sheeple that march in lock-step with the party leaders. Thanks for pointing out the fact that Republicans can think for themselves.

Is anyone defending him? Should we organize a rally and make up a little chant like "pigs in a blanket, fry'em like bacon"?

And you want to increase the size and scale of the crook's playground. Bigger government just leads to more crooks stealing more money, and yet you mysteriously want to accommodate the thefts by voting for this cradle to grave entitlement of the elitists. So why do you complain when this is exactly what you voted for?

As opposed to the climate of the Black guy who shot a little baby in the face just for being White. Is that the climate you are trying to bring back? How pathetic can you get. Your hate is on full display, to bad you can't hear the laughter directed at you.

Thank God Republicans blocked as much as they did, although they didn't block nearly enough. Luckily the American people saw the irrational agenda Obama was trying to implement a voted out over 1100 Democrat seats during Obama's reign.

Wow, from where did you pull out the lie that I think only blacks protested against Bush or Trump? Why do you consistently try to change my words (and others) to fit your biased and unrealistic reality? It must get exhausting spending that much effort clinging to an irrational mindset. And if you haven't seen tons of nasty protest signs on the news in the last 6 months, then you must be tuning to exclusively Liberal media networks who would love nothing better than to keep you in the dark and all of their little sheeple towing the line. And how dare you demand I post proof when I've asked you repeatedly for proof of your contentions and you run and hide, only to restate the same bogus crap at a later date. But I will help you out. A simple Bing (or Google) search will give you plenty of pictures and videos. Try this one: [Hidden Content] Or this one: [Hidden Content] I'm sure with a little thought and effort you can come up with your own searches. In fact, if you get competent in these searches, you could spend years researching these nasty signs about all of the presidents in history. But I highly doubt you will even try. I have a feeling you know that all of the presidents have endured harsh and unwarranted criticism from the fringes, and this revelation would force you to admit that the criticism of Obama was not about race. I bet you will choose to stay naïve rather than admit you were wrong.

If someone would put together a list like that for Bush and Trump it would take six weeks just to scroll through them all. And many of those signs listed were fine. Many were out-of-bounds. I don't know what criteria the author was using for inclusion, but seemed pretty random, although (s)he incorrectly stated that the criteria was examples of racism, sexism, and homophobia. Many, if most, do not fit that criteria...which leads one to believe this is just an unabashed hit piece that uses misinformed and misleading criteria based on hate. And many of these were pretty good. So good I copied a bunch for saving. I bet you would guess completely wrong on which ones I saved.

Is that like the Liberals saying they are the party of all-inclusiveness, but only if you belong to one of our accepted groups.

Wow. Let me get over the shock of you finally producing one iota of evidence. But that is all it is...one iota. And NOBODY on here defended it. You have been asked many times to produce evidence of the signs with the N-word at Republican rallies but have fail miserably. I can produce plenty of pictures of Nixon, Reagan, Bush, Bush, and Trump being hanged in effigy, volumes more than you can produce of Obama. Your side said they wanted to make Melania Trump a sex slave. I could produce volumes more of things said about Trump's family than you can produce of things said about Obama's family...and we are just 4 months in versus 8 years. You only see what you want to see, and regardless of what you see...you will conform and contort the facts to adhere to your pre-conceived bias stereotypes. We all see it. And we also see when you throw out baseless stereotypes towards people on this board, Southeast Texas folks, southern folks, and White folks in general. It's fun to expose your hate then watch you squirm, although most of the time you just ignore posts that call you out and just move on to the next thread to spout your hate.

What things said about Obama and his family do you feel people on this board wouldn't defend? Please give some examples. Or is this just a case of you stereotyping again? For someone that makes a lot of posts of this forum, you sure do say a whole lot of nothing.

I'm surprised more people haven't expressed outrage on this revelation, especially those 30 years old and under. Y'all have been lied to basically all of your lives...blatant lies...so much so that one would think you would be outraged at the folks that perpetuated the false narrative of gender pay bias. I guess it's easier to ignore the truth rather than admit you were suckered. If you want to prevent this same shameful revelation from happening to you again, you might want to read up on the Man-Made Global Warming Theory (currently and laughably known as "Climate Change"). When perusing the stories written on the subject, keep focused on two things...where is the link between Man's activity and climate change, and is this change detrimental to Earth's health. If you can't find the answers (and you won't), but still worship at the Climate Change alter, you are definitely going to have a regrettable deja vu moment.

Two of my most anticipated times of the year...the release of DCTF and Todd's HS football previews. I concur with rykerx on the many thanks you deserve for all the hard work you put into this.

Wow, that's all you could muster from my post, and not even close to what I said. Big Girl said Trump doesn't have any self-control. I responded that someone with no self-control could not amass the fortune that he has. How in the world could you read that and then make the statement you made. If must take a lot effort and mental gymnastics to read the word self-control and somehow twist and conform that to mean intelligence.

You lie everyday about Trump lying everyday! Must be hard having to endure the pain of knowing your leaders blatantly lied to your face. They know you will not think for yourself or take the initiative to learn the facts. All you can do to justify your stance is to cry about how the other side is doing the same thing, even when you can't produce anything to back up your contentions. That is just embarrassing, especially for the fact that everyone on here can see how your leaders pull the puppet strings, and your only reaction is to lie about perceived like actions. Admit it, you've been lied to for 30 years and you fell for it hook, line and sinker...even though the refuting evidence was at your fingertips.

Do you really want to know? Do you feel qualified to carry on a conversation about that topic? If so, my question would be, why do you feel qualified?

Yes, you need to say a lot more. (Sorry Nash, that sentence was so spot on it needed to be asked twice.) Please elaborate on how his tweets show that he doesn't have any self control. Someone with no self control would not be able to amass the fortune he has. There are no dead bodies piled up in his closet (unlike Hillary). He has had access to guns, knives, bats, and many other weapons all of his life, but has not lost self-control and killed or even injured someone. He uses the power of the pen (tweet), and it drives Liberals nuts because they can't control the narrative when he bypasses them. The fact that you can only muster this one item as a lame excuse to disparage the man proves you have nothing...just a bitter old soul lashing out like a spoiled child. This would be quite embarrassing for a normal person. And Obama also gave Russians classified information. Read the article PhatMack posted on the subject, then come back on here and apologize.

The Left is doing a great job of creating fake outrage out of nothing, and they know their little sheeple will follow along. How about you prove you can think for yourself and list some of the things that lead you to the conclusion that Trump is "taking down himself". I would love to hear what facts you think are important versus which you think are unimportant.

Since the timing seems to be a key component for you, when do you think he should have fired Comey? The Liberals have been screaming about ties to Russia less than an hour after Trump won the election. Do you actually think your side would not have their heads exploding no matter the timing? Such fake outrage! And Obama fired a ton of DOJ attorneys when he took office. Do you think some of them were leading investigations? Why no outrage then?

So no comment. Why did Obama commute the sentence of a convicted traitor of the United States of America? Manning released nearly three-quarters of a million classified, or unclassified but sensitive, military and diplomatic documents. Do you think Obama commuted his sentence because he knew it would outrage people, therefore allowing the sheeple on the Left to scream about oppression of transgenders? If Manning was a normal straight guy, do you think he would still be in prison? How does it feel to get played like a fiddle? And now that Manning is considered female, do you think he should receive less pay than when he was considered a man?

So, no response from any of the Liberals on here. I get that. It's hard when you find out your leaders have been flat out lying to you for decades. The debunking studies were prevalent and easily accessible nearly 30 years ago, and basically put a stop to all of the gender pay gap nonsense. But in the last 10+ years the debunked theory saw a resurgency, and was a major item on the Liberal platform. Why did the mainstream media let the lie return to prominence? But my real question is why are you not outraged at every Liberal leader who championed this lie? And would you vote for them again even after they have purposely lied to you?

The New York Times finally admits the gender pay gap is a complete and total lie: [Hidden Content] This is not new information by a long shot. I read plenty of studies in the 1990s that completely debunked this myth. How Liberals could fall for the lie for so long is indescribable. And how stupid would Liberals feel if y'all would have been successful in implementing laws to solve a problem that never existed. If Hillary would have won, do you think this paper would tell the truth about something in total disagreement with her claims. Trump has the ability to stop draughts in California and now make a Liberal rag tell the truth. Trump wins again. If Obama gets credit for killing Bin Laden, then you have to give full credit to Trump for the long overdue admission by the New York Times. Hopefully Trump can now get the New York Times to come clean on the Man Made Global Warming lie.

Big Girl might have to join the rest of us and learn how to walk on egg shells.

Where did you say you got your psychology degree? I'm amazed how you can perform a detailed psychological diagnosis based on information from the Huffington Post. And I'm 100% with Stevenash, please give examples of some of the activities Trump has engaged in that lead you to draw your well-thought out analysis. (Ignore that laughter you keep hearing all around you.)

Why did you quote me then give this response? Is it supposed to somehow be relevant to my post?