Englebert

Please expound on your thoughts. I've asked this over and over and over, but you never comply. Why do you feel the need to throw out baseless statements then run and hide when challenged to back up these statements? Are you not totally embarrassed by your silence? You've been served! (I don't keep up with modern lingo so I have no idea if that is a relevant statement in today's vernacular, but I'm calling you out none the less.) And I'm still looking for the source of those alternate history books you keep referring to. They seem to be so obscure that even Bing and Google have never heard of them...and that is saying something.

Normally I would be in total agreement...shocking that someone would backup his boss. I made sure to include the source of the information, CNN, who has unabashedly dogged Trump from the get-go. It's hard for me to imagine that CNN would post a contradictory statement without the strongly worded confirmation that the only denial is from friendly ground. If an accusation of wrongdoing by Obama was "revealed" and FoxNews stated, without comment, that an Obama administrator denied the report, it would be clearly defined who was doing the denying. I'm overwhelmingly confident that CNN would do the same. The fact that CNN did not add commentary or even highlight who the denier was leads me to believe CNN is convinced this is a non-story. And I'm in total agreement with you...I hope this is a non-story.

Ooops, might be a little premature: [Hidden Content] White House National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster said The Washington Post report that President Trump shared highly classified info with the Russian foreign minister and Russian ambassador to the US is false. Source: CNN

Please expound on what you find offensive? I'm very curious to as to why you think these peaceful protests should be subjected to oppression and denied their 1st amendment rights.

Trump is not a view or a value. What views/values do you think have changed with the Republicans that make you think some faction has taken over the party? I don't think Trump would have won the Republican ticket 10 or more years ago, so something has changed. Trump does not espouse many of the Republican values, so it seems the Republicans have become more tolerant. The Left seems to have moved to the far (almost unseen) left, and do not tolerate non-conformists. What do you think about each party? You titled this thread "a serious question" but haven't given your views. Is this really a serious question for you or did you start it to illicit viewpoints you could then deride. If you are serious about the question you would deliver your thoughts...enabling us to shred them.

How would you describe the Socialist and hateful views/values that have become the zenith of the Liberal platform? My word is "looney". I know that is probably not a strong enough word, and would love to hear what descriptive word(s) you would use. What contentions are you trying to make about the Republican party? What views/values do you think have changed with the Republicans that make you think some faction has taken over the party?

I agree that McCain is a RINO, but not near far enough left to win as a Democrat. The few real Democrats left would have probably voted for him, but the Democrat party has been taken over by looney Liberals. Even Hillary had to adjust her values to fit with the loons. Bill Clinton would have had to severely change his stances to win the Democrat vote today, and he's the old hero of the once proud party. Now the Democrats fully embrace the likes of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. To be successful in the Liberal party today you have to be totally and actively against any traditional American values, demonize any non-minority, and be willing to utilize any method, including illegal acts, of suppressing those espousing ideas that don't conform to the socialistic agenda. So no, I don't think McCain would have won.

Do you have a poll for that contention. Last poll I saw on this (although I quit paying attention to polls a while back) showed that 98% of Trump voters would vote for him again. Who are the smart Republicans that feel Trump is off the chain? Better question is...Why do you think Trump is off the chain? Please give some examples of Trump's behavior that lead you to this expert opinion. I will venture to guess to that your expert opinion is based solely on soaking up too much Liberal diseased media meltdowns. Your leaders throw their little childish temper-tantrums and you interpret this as real news, and follow their every word like a good little sheeple.

What knowledge are you trying to gain from an answer? Every single person on here knows you twist facts to fit your preconceived notions instead of the logical course of letting facts dictate opinions. So what fallacy are you trying fit into your pigeon-holed label? I bet you won't answer with an insightful response. In fact, I would bet money on it.

In that poll that you are quoting...is Hillary still 10 points ahead of Trump? Does this poll still have Hillary winning in a landslide? And you are all in favor of Obamacare even though poll numbers have all been below 50% favorability since the law was shoved down our throats. No wonder y'all lost over 1100 government seats since Obamacare was passed. And you have the audacity to say we are in a state of denial. That is hilarious...and very sad at the same time. And your other topic is just lunacy. Trump could fail miserably as president but still be better than Obama...although the poll you quoted would probably show him as the greatest ever, reflecting the naïve and conformist positions many of the Liberal sheeple are told to believe.

Naivete doesn't come close to explaining this asinine statement. I would venture to guess some other theories but I'm afraid they would all be against forum rules.

If pedestrian, childish, immature two word sentences is all you can muster from my quote, then you need to seriously ponder the station of you life. I know 3rd graders that could have come up with a more intelligent response. How are you not embarrassed is the question that deserves urgent attention.

I guess this is what happens when like minded fellows try to comprehend uncomfortable statements. You refuse to back up your statements with examples of your contentions, and just try to use the old "we all agree so it must be true" childish logic. What a simplistic world that must be.

Yes I do. In fact, I'm fairly certain that there are thousands upon thousands of false accusations of racism for every true one. Liberals like to point to the South as examples of racists, as the North was a little earlier in outlawing the practice of Slavery. Show me some documented proof that more racists currently reside in the South than in the North. I contend that the majority live on the East and West coasts disguised as Liberals. What percentage of Whites do you think are racist? (When answering, please keep in mind that Civil Rights legislation, Affirmative Action laws and trillions of dollars have been spent on Minority causes.)

So you just restate my statement (in a primitive fashion). Why didn't you use the old "I know you are but what am I" quip.

Only in your little world. Just because you say it over and over doesn't make it true. It must be hard having to constantly twist reality to fit your narrative. It seems to me like it would take less energy to just soak up the facts and base perceptions on where the facts lead. To constantly twist and manipulate the facts to conform to your preconceived narrative must be taxing on the soul, leading to tiredness and irritation, then to hate.

I find it odd that many classify this show as a Conservative show. There are four people on the show that express political views, 2 Conservatives and 2 Liberals. Only in a Liberal world can equality mean oppression by angry old White men. Liberals don't want equality, they want to dominate everyone that doesn't share their warped sense of values. Sounds a little like that terrorist group across the pond (and trying to get a foothold here).

I figured you wouldn't respond to my post. And who are you to decide what is the truth. I bet you think Obama was a good president. You think it is the truth, but reality says otherwise.

I probably would not be happy with many of the ones listed, but they would all be better than Obama. And what's your obsession about people with money? Are you really so naive that you fall for that crappy old misnomer the Liberals like to control their flock with...all rich people are evil. I knew they floated out that tiresome line a lot, but didn't think anyone was actually stupid enough to believed it. I guess you proved me wrong.

What? No examples to support your proclamation. Who would have guessed.

Which claim are you referring to? Which doesn't really matter, most credible historians would agree with every single word of that post. Just because it differs from your preconceived notions doesn't make it false. I'm sure you can find some people in your own little world who agree with you. Y'all have websites devoted to distorting the truth to fit the Liberal narrative...but many can see through that nonsense.

Apparently you have a reading comprehension deficiency because I don't mind saying negative stuff about Trump, and have plenty of times on this board. I get it, you only read what you want to read. And when it doesn't fit your narrative, you perform your mental gymnastics to twist things to conform to your own little preconceived notions. It's crystal clear to most on here.

Any one of those would definitely be better than Obama. You could throw a ball into a crowd and whoever caught it would make a better president than him. I don't think anyone can honestly disagree with that statement...although I'm sure you will without offering one shred of proof (per normal).

You've wrote some very negative and untruthful things about Trump on this website. Trump can come after you with impunity because people on his level do not get prosecuted...as we have all seen with Obama and Hillary. And why did you quote me but have nothing to say about Obama trying to influence the Israeli elections? Oops, my bad...I almost forgot...you would never say anything negative about Obama. Maybe he's the one who should have been fired. No, definitely he's the one who should have been fired. And before you go into your little half-witted comment, I will beat you to the punch...President Donald Trump will always and forever be known as President of the United States. (And he won't have the caveat as "worst" in his title).

Be careful, he just might come after you. Since Obama set the standard that it is now okay to spy on your enemies, Trump might just start checking the NSA surveillance logs to see who is in need of an attitude adjustment from Big Brother.