Englebert

If Obama would have done the very same thing you would be accusing the Prime Minister of being racist for having the audacity to keep the black man down by standing in his way.

Yep, still imitating Liberals. Liberals hate it when you use their same tactics against them.

Having ties to a White supremacy group leads me to believe he was a Democrat. The fact that he has a history of mental illness and is intolerant of people that don't think like him leads me to believe he is a Liberal.

Only a Liberal can make up a lie about Trump, then accuse him of being a hypocrite when that lie is proven to be a lie. I don't know who wrote this quote, but it is clearly evident they are the one that has no clue about America and it's long-term or short-term interests.

Read up a little bit on all of the women who were forced by Old Bill. You get outraged at what Trump bragged about doing, but you conveniently ignore the many things Bill is actually accused of doing. But that's just typical of you snowflakes. We have seen enough fake outrage to last a lifetime from your ilk.

Right 6.21, Libertarian 5.16 I hate taking these type of quizzes because the questions are so subjective and open-ended it is impossible to garner any type of accurate, or even slightly accurate score. But I love taking these type of quizzes because they are fun, even though I laugh and cringe simultaneously at the nature and wording on the questions.

It was a figurative word in lower case letters. Don't get your panties in a wad for creative license. If you are upset by a word that didn't necessarily refer to you, then you have no business calling anyone a partisan on any subject.

Just like Bill Clinton? When Gingrich faced off with Clinton, he made Clinton bow to him (figuratively). Clinton was full throttle into his wild spending when Gingrich made him curtail and acquiesce to moderate (and even a Righty) agenda. For many, Old Bill gets the credit for being a great president that knew how to work the Congress, while Gingrich gets painted by the Left as a partisan hack. Who was it that shut down the government...twice...during Bill's reign? It wasn't Gingrich. If idolization is due Clinton, Gingrich should be regarded as Zeus. I realize your post had no connotations or elusions to this, I just can't pass up the chance to remind the Liberals that their god Bill Clinton was played like a fiddle by Gingrich, and we are all better off for it.

Maybe we can "collude" with the Russians (or a high school computer geek) to hack into the DNC emails to get the real number. Hopefully no one will wind up dead in the process.

You must be the little brother.

Boy are your analytical skills out of whack. The Conservatives are not the party of hate. That would be you and your Liberal party, formerly know as the Democrat party.

I still don't see your analogy lines. Politicians are very much real, just use fake talking points to keep themselves in position. If you are trying to equate fake talking points with being a fake person, then okay. Seems like too far of a stretch to me. I wish politicians were more like the Superfriends, but they tend to act more like the people the Superfriends fight.

And that is similar to Superfriends how?

I'm surprised you don't like Paul Ryan. He wants to expand government, just like you do. He wants the government to run our lives from cradle to grave, just like you do. He wants to confiscate money from the working class people and redistribute it to those without, just like you do. Y'all might be brothers.

Care to explain?

You might think it is funny, but we are the ones laughing...and we are not laughing with you. We know you constantly quote the Liberal talking points. Republicans think for themselves, while Liberals are the little sheeple that walk in lock-step with their almighty leaders. This fact is well documented even in your alternate history books. Even you can't deny it, even though you make feeble attempts at it. I feel sorry for the true Democrats that are left, having to watch their once proud party being ruined by Liberals. Your retort just piles on more evidence of the destruction of the Democrat party. Deny, deny, deny, blame, blame, blame, pass judgement, pass judgment pass judgment, label, label, label. All of your posts can pretty much be summed up into one of these categories.

An analogy is an analogy. It would only be dehumanizing for someone trying to read too much into an analogy. As far as Point A, we don't know who injected the grapes, therefore have no way to determine the good from the bad. And for Point C, the foolish endeavor was eating the grapes, i.e. taking your chances and hoping you guess right as opposed to the prudent act of ensuring safety but not being able to enjoy the fruit.

It's just too addictive. I was supposed to get back to work 20 minutes ago.

Then my analogy was spot on.

I played a friend in golf a while back. We decided to play match play. I won 12 of the 18 holes. He beat me in overall score. When he whined about having the lower overall score, I didn't say a word. I just waved my winnings in front of his face. He never said another would about it...unlike some that constantly whine even though they knew the rules.

I have no problem getting along with people that I don't see eye-to-eye. But when someone makes an accusation, then it is their duty to back up their contentions. And I bet it would bother you a whole lot if people started accusing you of pedophilia, especially since you are in the Education field. That could be very damaging to your career. And that is my whole point. You accused a person of stereotyping a group of people, then want to run and hide without explanation. That is just not right, and is potentially harmful. If you want to spout an opinion, be prepared to back it up. If you have reasons for labeling someone, then give those reasons. I might not agree with you, and that's fine. But to throw out an accusation without explanation is just flat out wrong. On a side note, I really appreciate you giving the scores and updates on the soccer and baseball forums. I wish we had more like you to take the time to do this. For this, I give you a big thank you. And please keep posting them.

You advocate for every government expenditure proposed, and are constantly saying "what has the government done for me". You can deny all you want, but it is easy to deduce your mindset.

How would you feel if they acted like Obama...never admitting failure and always blaming others for his failures? If I had to pick between the two, I would take the crude non-PC talk over blaming others any day.

And you still want to increase the size and scale of the Federal government. That is incomprehensible to most.

But here you are debating. I'm curious as to what part of my analogy you think is incorrect. If you want to offer an opinion on a subject, especially when you are accusing others of negatively stereotyping a group of people, it's your duty to back up your claims. I guess I could claim you are a pedophile then simply say I won't debate. Now that wouldn't be very nice would it.