Englebert

Your buddy ignored and refused to answer my question just a few posts above, so I will pose it to you. Let's see if you respond or also run and hide. Do these tunnels have the capability of thwarting ground penetrating radar? Are they stealth tunnels?

Is that why Obama is all of a sudden buddy-buddy with Wall Street and taking their money?

Please explain "people like me". What characteristics do you think I harbor that keep you coming back. Is it the fact that I'll call you out without fear when you spew your hate-filled negative stereotypes at groups you don't agree with? Please elaborate, I need a chuckle this morning.

You are starting to sound like Bluedove. Did you get ahold of some of his secret history books?

I'm guessing this is why Harry Reid went nuclear, so Obama could get his lackey's in judicial positions to hammer his wing-nut Liberal positions down the throat of the American people.

Which law is the U.N. referring? The law about killing gays. The law about stoning female adulterers. The law about forbidding Christianity. The law about killing infidels. The law about slaughtering Jews. The law about woman not allowed to drive. The law about women not allowed to go to school. The law about woman having to cover their face and body in public. The law about pedophilia. The immigration laws practiced by most countries. I'm not familiar with the law that mandates citizens pay for others health insurance. How about we get the U.N. to pay for every American's health insurance. Ooops, that would mean American dollars would still be the source of funding.

I would be willing to bet any amount of money that if a Lefty loon was scheduled to give a speech, and a bunch of Christians, or White supremacists, or KKK members, or Bikers, or Rednecks, or Hillbillies, or Tea Partiers even mentioned their attendance with the possibility of violence, Berkeley would already have the National Guard in place to decisively quell any threat. Berkeley's excuse of not being able to assure security is a cowardly act and a blatant lie. The birthplace of free speech is now the bastion of fascism. What a senseless fall from grace the Democrat party has sunken to. Mob rules.

She sounds to me the way she has always sounded...incoherent.

Wow, you mean the press will give him a pass on everything, including blatantly lying to the American public. And anyone that disagrees with him will be labeled a racist. Like LumRaiderFan stated, Trump would love it. And no more bashing his family...wife and kids are off-limits. Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren and Nancy Pelosi would not be able to open their mouths. And Trump will be free to spy on anyone he chooses. He can also use the I.R.S. as his personal attack dog. He and his administration can break the law all they like without fear of prosecution. Does this mean Trump will also get the Nobel Peace prize for doing nothing?

Don't try to project your hate on Republicans. Most aren't as cynical as you. If you want examples of people that don't care about other people and are full of hate, just pick out any Liberal to analyze. You know nothing about Republicans. Spout your negative stereotypes elsewhere. It's getting old and tiresome. On second thought, your feeble rants are what keep this board entertaining. Please continue.

Who were these famous Republicans that threatened to move to Canada if Obama was elected?

I started listening to 60s music in the 90s...and never went back to current music. I'm somewhat curious as to what the kids are learning in school nowadays. Hopefully (but I highly doubt) they are learning many of the literary classics.

First thing to come to my mind when hearing Pied Piper is Crispian St. Peters. I wonder how many are having to go back to Google that.

Yep, that's a double whammy...not talent and liars. The list of shame.

Since some on here feel the need to espouse fake outrage on frivolous stuff, here's an updated status of the celebrities that promised to move to Canada if Trump was elected. Are you just as outraged about these lies? [Hidden Content]

Well that was much ado about nothing. Just some more fake outrage.

I'm curious as to why you are so outraged at Trump for saying "falsehoods" but did not say a peep about all of Obama's falsehoods. Nobody is saying it is okay, they are just pointing out your hypocrisy. It is a simple concept that you seem to fail to grasp. And I would rather have a president that engages in gutter talk than one that looks the American people in the eye and tells a knowingly blatant lie, just to get his disastrous monstrosity passed. You seem to be outraged by frivolous and inconsequential rhetoric but seem to be just fine when blatant lies are spoken that adversely affects the entirety of the country.

Liberals are fighting hard to make sure pre-existing conditions are covered because they know that Liberalism will soon be classified as a mental disorder. They don't want to pay higher premiums for having a pre-existing condition. Liberals don't care about people, they are only looking out for themselves. (Whew, it's hard work to twist reality into a preconceived notion. I don't know how Liberals do it consistently...and without shame.)

You make a statement that "I will admit to it and you won't". I asked to you explain what I won't admit to, and you reply with this. You are beyond childish. Third graders are laughing at you. But you do keep up the entertainment on this board.

So what do your Republican white friends think about you when you tell them the government is corrupt but we need more of it? I bet they laugh in your face instead of behind your back.

What will you admit that I won't. That has to be one of the stupidest statements I've ever seen. You will never admit and or find fault with anything Obama does. I have no problem calling out anyone, including Trump. And what does your link have to do with the topic? Are you trying to deflect or is it you are just not bright enough to realize your link has nothing to do with the topic? Bring Big Girl back, you are starting to get worse than her.

What does this have to do with my post? Why did you quote me then put this link? My response was about over regulation. Your link is saying that more regulation is needed. And your link shows your ignorance on this subject. The politicians are doing this (in their minds) to help the people. And I've already written the rationale for why politicians are doing this. The ISP's are claiming they need more revenue. The rationale is that they can sell the user's data to advertisers, thus pass the new revenue stream onto them, or alternatively they can raise their prices on consumers. The politicians have agreed on passing the revenue onto the advertisers because the consumers have shown over and over and over that they are willing to endure more advertisements and loss of privacy for cheaper prices.

And look how we ended up. Government telling us what we can eat and not eat, government spying on us, recording every phone call and email message, tracking every website we visit, government taking half of our incomes to redistribute, government running up a 20 trillion dollar debt, government telling our schools what they can teach and what they can't teach, government stifling and even strangling small business with unnecessary regulations, government picking and choosing what business receive government benefits and tax breaks, government blatantly lying to public to push an unproven theory which will cost trillions of dollars, etc. I have no doubt if the South would have won our government would be less elitist and resemble more closely the will of the people.

So when Brady skipped the White House visit during Obama's reign was it because he didn't want to shake hands with a crook?

What make's you think this? What privileged knowledge of my life to you think you know about? You're analytical and assessment skills are severely lacking, so you just attempt basic and mundane stereotypes. That is just childish and boorish, and incredibly embarrassing.